green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
7.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1992 ·
…all machines function according to the laws of physics which can be mathematically set forth if known.
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1990 ·
…the inherency of an advantage and its obviousness are entirely different questions. that which may be inherent is not necessarily known. obviousness cannot be predicated on what is unknown.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 17 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re '639 Patent Litigation
submissions usually will support the conclusion that the affidavit in which they were contained was the chosen instrument of an intentional scheme to deceive the pto
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Arrhythmia Research Technology, Inc. v. Corazonix Corporation
(2×)
all machines function according to the laws of physics which can be mathematically set forth if known.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Joy Technologies, Inc. v. Manbeck
the objective evidence of nonobviousness ... may in a given case be entitled to more weight or less, depending on its nature and its relationship to the merits of the invention.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Diane M. Dillon
(2×)
the inherency of an advantage and its obviousness are entirely different questions. that which may be inherent is not necessarily known. obviousness cannot be predicated on what is unknown.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Ashland Oil, Inc. v. Delta Resins & Refractories, Inc.
Gore & Associates, Inc. v. Garlock, Inc., 721 F.2d 1540 , 220 USPQ 303 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 172 , 83 L.Ed.2d 107 *291 (1984), and Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip Corp., 713 F.2d 1530 , 218 USPQ 871 (Fed.
discussed
Cited "see"
EI DuPont De Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Co.
See Gore v. Garlock, 721 F.2d 1540, 1554 (Fed.Cir.1983) (no anticipation where, inter alia, the record did not contain any evidence of tests in which the alleged anticipatory processes were conducted, nor were the products of the processes placed in evidence), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 851 , 105 S.Ct. 172 , 83 L.Ed.2d 107 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joanne Kotler, Individually and as Administratrix, Etc. v. The American Tobacco Company
See Goldstein v. Kelleher, 728 F.2d 32, 38 (1st Cir.) (“In the absence of any indication that the jury selected was unsatisfactory to plaintiff at the time chosen, we are unwilling to reverse the verdict of a jury that to all appearances was disinterested, competent and suitable.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 852 , 105 S.Ct. 172 , 83 L.Ed.2d 107 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Halliburton Co. v. Schlumberger Technology Corp.
See Rohm & Haas Co. v. Crystal Chemical Co., 722 F.2d 1556, 1571 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 851 , 105 S.Ct. 172 , 83 L.Ed.2d 107 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,361 Louis v. Jackvony, Jr. v. Riht Financial Corporation, Etc., John R. Cioci v. Riht Financial Corporation, Etc.
See Goldstein v. Kelleher, 728 F.2d 32, 39 (1st Cir.) (“In order to uphold grant of directed verdict we must find that, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, reasonable jurors could come but to one conclusion.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 852 , 105 S.Ct. 172 , 83 L.Ed.2d 107 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Clamp-All Corporation v. Cast Iron Soil Pipe Institute
See Goldstein v. Kelleher, 728 F.2d 32, 39 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 852 , 105 S.Ct. 172 , 83 L.Ed.2d 107 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Kangaroos U.S.A., Inc. v. Caldor, Inc.
See Rohm & Haas Co. v. Crystal Chemical Co., 722 F.2d 1556, 1573 , 220 USPQ 289, 302 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 172 , 83 L.Ed.2d 107 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hartford Fire Insurance v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.
Compare Jackvony, 873 F.2d at 413 (“In order to uphold grant of directed verdict we must find that, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, reasonable jurors could come but to one conclusion.”) (quoting Goldstein v. Kelleher, 728 F.2d 32, 39 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 852 , 105 S.Ct. 172 , 83 L.Ed.2d 107 (1984)) with Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 , 106 S.Ct. 2505, 2510 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986) (summary judgment is permissible only where “the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could not return a verdict for the nonmoving p…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
William R. Gooley v. Mobil Oil Corporation
United States v. Kobrosky, 711 F.2d 449, 457 (1st Cir.1983); see also Goldstein v. Kelleher, 728 F.2d 32, 37 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 852 , 105 S.Ct. 172 , 83 L.Ed.2d 107 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Muzamal Chaudhry, A/K/A Omar Muzamal
United States v. Kobrosky, 711 F.2d at 457 ; see also Goldstein v. Kelleher, 728 F.2d 32, 37 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 852 , 105 S.Ct. 172 , 83 L.Ed.2d 107 (1984); United States v. Gazda, 499 F.2d 161, 164 (3d Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc., S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.
See also Rohm & Haas Co. v. Crystal Chemical Co., 736 F.2d 688, 692 , 222 USPQ 97, 100 (Fed.Cir), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 172 , 83 L.Ed.2d 107 (1984) (reviewing the legislative history of section 285).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.
Compare, Connell v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542 , 220 USPQ 193 (Fed.Cir.1983) (upholding district court determination that the patent was not unenforceable for fraud) 6 with Rohm and Haas Co. v. Crystal Chemical Co., 722 F.2d 1556 , 220 USPQ 289 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 172 , 83 L.Ed.2d 107 (1984) (reversing determination that the patent was not invalid for fraud). 29 The Supreme Court has discussed inequitable conduct, as a defense to a claim of patent infringement, in terms of enforceability, see, e.g., Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotiv…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J.P. Stevens & Co. v. Lex Tex Ltd.
Compare, Connell v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 722 F.2d 1542 , 220 USPQ 193 (Fed.Cir.1983) (upholding district court determination that the patent was not unenforceable for fraud) 6 with Rohm and Haas Co. v. Crystal Chemical Co., 722 F.2d 1556 , 220 USPQ 289 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 172 , 83 L.Ed.2d 107 (1984) (reversing determination that the patent was not invalid for fraud).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Garlock Inc.
v.
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
v.
W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
No. 84-2.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.