green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.5 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1992 ·
…only when the court is convinced upon the record before the jury that reasonable persons could not have reached a verdict for the non-mover, should it grant the motion for jnov.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Malta v. Schulmerich Carillons, Inc.
only when the court is convinced upon the record before the jury that reasonable persons could not have reached a verdict for the non-mover, should it grant the motion for jnov.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Malta v. Schulmerich Carillons, Inc.
only when the court is convinced upon the record before the jury that reasonable persons could not have reached a verdict for the non-mover, should it grant the motion for jnov.
cited
Cited "see"
Vandor Corp. v. Wilson
See Perkinr-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 900 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hilton Davis Chemical Co. v. Warner-Jenkinson Company, Inc.
(2×)
See Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 893 , 221 USPQ 669, 673 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984); Railroad Dynamics Inc., 727 F.2d at 1512-13 , 220 USPQ at 936.
cited
Cited "see"
General Electro Music Corp., and General Music S.P.A. v. Samick Music Corporation
See Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 893 , 221 USPQ 669, 673 (Fed.Cir.) (citation omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Modine Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. The Allen Group, Inc., D/B/A the G & O Manufacturing Company
See Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 893 , 221 USPQ 669, 673 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Becton Dickinson and Company v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
See Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 894 , 221 USPQ 669, 673 (Fed.Cir.) (“We review judgments ... not passing statements.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ziggity Systems, Inc. v. Val Watering Systems
(2×)
See Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 894 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984); Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17 , 86 S.Ct. 684, 693-94 , 15 L.Ed.2d 545 (1966); see also Stratoflex, Inc. v. Aeroquip Corp., 713 F.2d 1530, 1538 (Fed.Cir.1983) (“evidence arising out of the so-called ‘secondary considerations’ must always when present be considered in route to a determination of obviousness”).
cited
Cited "see"
King Instrument Corp. v. Perego
See Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 896 , 221 U.S.P.Q. 669 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
John M. Peduto and El-Ro, Inc. v. City of North Wildwood
See Collier v. City of Springdale, 733 F.2d 1311, 1314 (8th Cir.) (An inverse condemnation action is a constitutionally adequate procedure for obtaining just compensation when the government seizes property without initiating formal condemnation procedures), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 186 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hemperly v. Crumpton
See Collier v. City of Springdale, 733 F.2d 1311 , 1314-15 & n. 5 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 186 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984); Government of Virgin Islands v. 19,623 Acres of Land, 536 F.2d 566, 570-71 (3rd Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Berger & Gorin, Inc. v. Gary Plastic Packaging Corp.
See Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 894 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Tennessee Valley Authority v. United States
See Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 901 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984).
examined
Cited "see"
Richard R. Vieau and Robert A. Vieau v. Japax, Inc., Japax Scientific Corporation, and Textron, Inc., Defendants/cross
(4×)
See Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 893 , 221 USPQ 669, 673 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984). “ ‘Substantial’ evidence is such relevant evidence from the record taken as a whole as might be accepted by a reasonable mind as adequate to support the finding under review.” Id.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fonar Corporation and Dr. Raymond Damadian, Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Johnson & Johnson and Technicare Corporation, Appellees/cross-Appellants
Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc., 806 F.2d 1565, 1571 , 1 USPQ2d 1081, 1085 (Fed.Cir.1986); Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506, 1512 , 220 USPQ 929, 936 (Fed.Cir.), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984); see Rios v. Empresas Lineas Maritimas Argentinas, 575 F.2d 986, 989-90 (1st Cir.1978) (affirming denial of JNOV where jury could “reasonably” have reached its verdict on the record). “ ‘Substantial’ evidence is such relevant evidence from the record taken as a whole as might be accepted by a reasonable mind as adequa…
discussed
Cited "see"
Verdegaal Brothers, Inc., William Verdegaal, George Verdegaal v. Union Oil Company of California, Brea Agricultural Services, Inc.
See Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 893 , 221 USPQ 669, 673 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984); Railroad Dynamics, 727 F.2d at 1512 , 220 USPQ at 936 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Yarway Corporation v. Eur-Control Usa, Inc., and Eur-Control Kalle, A.B.
(2×)
See Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 900 , 221 USPQ 669, 678 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 , 225 USPQ 792 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
B.W.B. Controls, Inc. v. U.S. Industries, Inc.
See PerkinElmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 680 F.2d 669 (9th Cir.1982), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Antonious v. Spalding & Evenflo Companies, Inc.
Unique Concepts, Inc. v. Brown, 939 F.2d 1558, 1562 (Fed.Cir.1991) (claims may not be construed one way in order to obtain their allowance and in a different way against accused infringers); see also Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 900 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lucas Aerospace, Ltd. v. Unison Industries, L.P.
See, e.g., Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 893 (Fed.Cir.) (“Where, as here, there is a verdict of validity, the question is not whether the patentee had introduced sufficiently substantial evidence to support the verdict, but whether the challenger’s evidence so met the burden imposed by 35 U.S.C. § 282 (‘[t]he burden of establishing invalidity of a patent or any claim shall rest on the party asserting such invalidity’) that reasonable jurors could not have concluded that the challenger failed to overcome that burden.”) (citation omitted) (brackets in origi…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Lawrence B. Lockwood
(2×)
American Hoist & Derrick v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., 725 F.2d 1350, 1361 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 821 , 105 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed.2d 41 (1984); see also Perkin-Elmer v. Computervision, 732 F.2d 888 , 895 n. 5 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984); Richardson v. Suzuki Motor Co., 868 F.2d 1226, 1234 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 853 , 110 S.Ct. 154 , 107 L.Ed.2d 112 (1989). 15 The Seventh Circuit in Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 723 F.2d 1324 (7th Cir.1983) (in banc) addressed the issue of nonobviousness, one of the three conditions of patenta-b…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Goodwall Construction Co. v. Beers Construction Co.
Dataline Corp. v. Micro Technologies, Inc., 813 F.2d 1196, 1200 (Fed.Cir.1987) (citing Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computer Vision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 893 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984)); see also Railroad Dynamics, Inc. v. A. Stucki Co., 727 F.2d 1506 , 1512 *1050 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 871 , 105 S.Ct. 220 , 83 L.Ed.2d 150 (1984). “ ‘Substantial evidence’ is such relevant evidence from the record taken as a whole as might be accepted by a reasonable mind as adequate to support the finding under review.” Fonar Corp. v. Johnson & Jo…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Biodex Corporation v. Loredan Biomedical, Inc.
Compare Sjolund v. Musland, 847 F.2d 1573, 1576 , 6 USPQ2d 2020, 2023 (Fed.Cir.1988) (applying 9th Circuit law on review of denial of post-verdict motion) with Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 893 , 221 USPQ 669, 673 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984) (applying Federal Circuit law on review of denial of post-verdict motion).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Deuterium Corp. v. United States
See, e.g., Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 896 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984); In re Bulloch, 604 F.2d 1362, 1365 (CCPA 1979).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.
See, e.g., Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 894 , 221 USPQ 669, 674 (Fed.Cir.), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Diversitech Corporation v. Century Steps, Inc., Defendant-Cross
See also Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 896 , 221 USPQ 669, 675 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984) (the limitations appearing in the preamble are necessary to give meaning to the claim and properly define the invention).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Edgar L. Stencel
See also Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 896 , 221 USPQ 669, 675 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 857 , 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984) (the limitations appearing in the preamble are necessary to give meaning to the claim and properly define the invention).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-Appellants
(2×)
See, e.g., Perkin-Elmer Corp. v. Computervision Corp., 732 F.2d 888, 896 , 221 USPQ 669, 675-676 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 187 , 83 L.Ed.2d 120 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kramer
v.
Mitchell
v.
Mitchell
No. 84-171.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: Federal Circuit (2)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.