green
Positive treatment
10.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Rogers v. United States
(2×)
See Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558, 1566 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); Murray v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 71, 74 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wise v. Ruffin
(2×)
See Belland v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 726 F.2d 839, 843 (D.CiCir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gary G. Wise, Perry C. Harvey, Jr., John Bradshaw, Jr., Benjamin Flowers, Alton Jernigan, Don Klages, John MacKey John Roberts, Willie Sloan, Charles Spencer, John Wightman, in Their Capacities as Trustees for the South Atlantic Ila/employers District Escrow Fund and in Their Capacities as Trustees for the South Atlantic Ila/employers Gai Fund v. Peter B. Ruffin, Jack Tilley, John E. Dyer, Willie Sloan, William Piner, Nelson Adams, Clemmon L. Jacobs, Robert Hutchens, R. Blaine Brickhouse, in Their Capacities as Trustees for the Employers International Longshoremen's Association Afl/cio Pension Fund for the North Carolina Ports Area, Almont Shipping Company, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation, Stevedores, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation v. Peter Browne Ruffin, Ward King, John E. Dyer, Willie Sloan, William Piner, Henry Arron Rose, in Their Capacities as Trustees for the Employers-Ila Pension, Welfare & Vacation Fund for the North Carolina Ports Area, Almont Shipping Company, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation, Stevedores, Inc., a North Carolina Corporation v. Peter Browne Ruffin, Ward King, John E. Dyer, Willie Sloan, William Piner, Henry Arron Rose, in Their Capacities as Trustees for the Employers-Ila Pension, Welfare & Vacation Fund for the North Carolina Ports Area
(2×)
See Belland v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 726 F.2d 839, 843 (D.C.Cir.) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward Kuzniar and George Pistas
(2×)
See United States v. Gutman, 725 F.2d 417, 435 (7th Cir.) (Coffey, J., dissenting), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 244 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); Holland v. Allied Structural Steel Co., 539 F.2d 476, 483 (5th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1105 , 97 S.Ct. 1136 , 51 L.Ed.2d 557 (1977); see also 3 J.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roy Spotted War Bonnet
(2×)
See United States v. Schoefield, 465 F.2d 560, 562 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 881 , 93 S.Ct. 210 , 34 L.Ed.2d 136 (1972). 7 Cf. United States v. Gutman, 725 F.2d 417, 420 (7th Cir.) (court has the duty to conduct voir dire when witness’ insanity has rendered questionable his competence to testify), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 244 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United Steelworkers v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. (In Re Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp.)
(2×)
ERISA section 4002, 29 U.S.C. § 1302 ; see Belland v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 726 F.2d 839 , 843 & n. 4 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 [ 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 ] (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
(2×)
Sec. 1302 ; see Belland v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 726 F.2d 839 , 843 & n. 4 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984). 37 The purpose of a Chapter 11 reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code "is to restructure a business's finances so that it may continue to operate, provide its employees with jobs, pay its creditors, and produce a return for its stockholders." H.R.Rep.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. v. LTV Corp.
(2×)
ERISA section 4002, 29 U.S.C. § 1302 ; see Belland v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., 726 F.2d 839 , 843 & n. 4 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Snyder v. Baumecker
(2×)
See Angleton v. Pierce, 574 F.Supp. 719 , 723 n. 1 (D.N.J.1983), aff’d mem., 734 F.2d 3 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thompson v. United States
(2×)
See Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558, 1566 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); Murray v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 71, 74 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. United States
(2×)
See Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558, 1566 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); Murray v. United States, 9 Cl.Ct. 71, 74 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Burns v. United States
(2×)
See Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Murray v. United States
(2×)
See Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558, 1564-65 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Breitzke v. United States
(2×)
See Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558, 1564 (Fed.Cir.) cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eddie Brown, United States of America v. Horace Lewis Brown, United States of America v. Patricia Knight
See United States v. Gutman, 725 F.2d 417, 420 (7th Cir.) cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 244 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); Barnard, 490 F.2d at 912 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Ex Rel. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Robert H. Billingsley
(2×)
See United States v. Gutman, 725 F.2d 417, 422-36 (7th Cir.) (Coffey, J., dissenting), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 244 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re AHB
See United States v. Gutman, 725 F.2d 417, 421 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 105 S.Ct. 244 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984) (no "abnormal degree of internal inconsistency" found in witness' testimony); United States v. Jackson, 579 F.2d 553, 558 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. *496 569, 58 L.Ed.2d 652 (1978) ("[e]vidence is not necessarily insufficient merely because the witness' testimony has been contradictory and the explanations therefor difficult of belief" (citation omitted)); United States v. Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069, 1074 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 1021 , …
discussed
Cited "see"
In re A.H.B.
See United States v. Gutman, 725 F.2d 417, 421 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 244 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984) (no “abnormal degree of internal inconsistency” found in witness’ testimony); United States v. Jackson, 579 F.2d 553, 558 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 981 , 99 S.Ct. 569 , 58 L.Ed.2d 652 (1978) (“[e]vidence is not necessarily insufficient merely because the witness’ testimony has been contradictory and the explanations therefor difficult of belief” (citation omitted)); United States v. Tropiano, 418 F.2d 1069, 1074 (2d Cir.1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baker v. United States
(2×)
Plaintiffs must also “overcome the strong, but rebuttable, presumption that administrators of the military, like other public officials, discharge their duties correctly, lawfully, and in good faith.” Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 285, 302 , 594 F.2d 804, 813-4 (1979); see also Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baker v. United States
(2×)
Plaintiffs also must “overcome the strong, but rebuttable, presumption that administrators of the military, like other public officials, discharge their duties correctly, lawfully, and in good faith.” Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 285, 302 , 594 F.2d 804, 813-4 (1979); see also Bockoven v. United States, [Bockoven v. Marsh] 727 F.2d 1558 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rice v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558, 1563 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); Engels v. United States, 230 Ct.Cl. 465 , 678 F.2d 173 (1982); Greig v. United States, 226 Ct.Cl. 258 , 640 F.2d 1261 , cert. denied, 455 U.S. 907 , 102 S.Ct. 1251 , 71 L.Ed.2d 444 (1982); Hary v. United States, 223 Ct.Cl. 10 , 618 F.2d 704 (1980); Guy v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 427 , 608 F.2d 867 (1979) ; Sanders v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 285 , 594 F.2d 804 (1979); King v. United States, 19 Cl.Ct. 703 (1990), aff'd, 918 F.2d 186 (Fed.Cir.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Miller v. United States
(2×)
See also Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558, 1563 (Fed.Cir.), cert, denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984), where the Federal Circuit recently stated that highly trained and disciplined Army officers should be presumed to have followed direct orders to disregard any information not properly before them in making their selection decisions. 9 Cl.Ct. 463, 472 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kirwin v. United States
(2×)
See, e.g., Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558,1563 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 880 , 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984); Sanders, supra, 219 Ct.Cl. at 302 , 594 F.2d at 813 ; Smith v. United States, 19 Cl.Ct. 19, 26 (1989), aff'd, 914 F.2d 271 (Fed.Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Braddock v. United States
(2×)
See also Bockoven v. Marsh, 727 F.2d 1558, 1563 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984), where the Federal Circuit recently stated that highly trained and disciplined Army officers should be presumed to have followed direct orders to disregard any information not properly before them in making their selection decisions.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
NAACP, Boston Chapter v. Pierce
(2×)
State Highway Commission of Missouri v. Volpe, 479 F.2d 1099, 1105 (8th Cir.1973) (quoting Sikora v. Brenner, 379 F.2d 134, 136 (D.C.Cir.1967)); see also Angleton v. Pierce, 574 F.Supp. 719, 728 (D.N.J.1983) aff'd w/o op., 734 F.2d 3 (3rd Cir.1984), cert. denied — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 245 , 83 L.Ed.2d 183 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Belland
v.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
v.
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
No. 83-2162.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1984.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.