Garlam Enter. Corp. v. Autoridad de Carreteras de Puerto Rico, 469 U.S. 883 (1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Garlam Enter. Corp. v. Autoridad de Carreteras de Puerto Rico, 469 U.S. 883 (1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
215 citation events (13 in the last 25 years) across 40 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Connecticut Hospital Ass'n v. Pogue (ctd, 1994-11-30) · Strongest negative: Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Seymour Vigman (ca9, 1986-11-07)
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 40 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Securities Investor Protection Corporation v. Seymour Vigman
9th Cir. · 1986 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see In re Financial Corp. of America, 796 F.2d at 1130 (insufficient that defendant “ ‘has committed a proscribed act in a transaction of which the pledge of a security is a part’ ”) (quoting Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 943 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984)). c.
cited Cited as authority (rule) Connecticut Hospital Ass'n v. Pogue
D. Conn. · 1994 · confidence medium
Exchange Nat’l Bank of Chicago v. Touche Ross & Co., 544 F.2d 1126, 1130 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 5.Ct. 253, 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Robinson v. Government of Malaysia
2d Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Exchange Nat’l Bank of Chicago v. Touche Ross & Co., 544 F.2d 1126, 1130-31 (2d Cir.1976) (discussing differences between Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(b)(6) motions), modified on other grounds, Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen Co., 726 F.2d 930 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984). .
discussed Cited "see" Gigliotti v. Mathys
D.V.I. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 943 (2d Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984) ("misrepresentation . .. not pertaining to the securities themselves" cannot be the basis of a section 10(b) violation); see also A.T.
cited Cited "see" Production Resource Group, L.L.C. v. Stonebridge Partners Equity Fund, L.P.
S.D.N.Y. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 943 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Mistretta v. Prokesch
E.D.N.Y · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Konik v. Champlain Valley Physicians, 733 F.2d 1007 , 1013 n. 4 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America Sales Practices Litigation
D.N.J. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 943 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984) (“in connection with” requires showing of both transaction causation and loss causation); Alpha Group Consultants Ltd. v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc., 1994 WL 561817 , *3 (S.D.Cal.) (same); Horwitz v. AGS Columbia Assocs., 700 F.Supp. 712, 721 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (same); Kearney v. Prudential-Bache Secs., Inc., 701 F.Supp. 416 , 425 n. 10 (S.D.N.Y.1988) (interpreting Chemical Bank to hold that “in connection with” test requires a showing of loss causation …
cited Cited "see" Westphal v. Catch Ball Products Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1997 · signal: see · confidence high
See Exchange National Bank v. Touche Ross & Co., 544 F.2d 1126, 1130-31 (2d Cir.1976), cert. denied 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Bissell v. Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 943 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Levitin v. PaineWebber, Inc.
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
The alleged misrepresentation or omission must be made “in, connection with the purchase or sale” of a security. 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b); 17 C.F.R. § 240 .10b-5; see Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 943 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" In Re JWP Inc. Securities Litigation
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 847 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986) (citing Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 942 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984)); In re Leslie Fay Cos., Inc. Securities Litigation, 871 F.Supp. 686 , 697 n. 10 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (Conner, J.).
cited Cited "see" In Re Blech Securities Litigation
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 943 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" AUSA Life Insurance v. Dwyer
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rand v. Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc., 794 F.2d 843, 847 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 987 , 107 S.Ct. 579 , 93 L.Ed.2d 582 (1986) (citing Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 942 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984)); In re Leslie Fay Cos., Inc. Securities Litigation, 871 F.Supp. 686 , 697 n. 10 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (Conner, J.).
discussed Cited "see" Securities & Exchange Commission v. Jakubowski
N.D. Ill. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984) (corporation misstated its financial condition to secure bank loan; bank loan was secured in part by pledge of stock *1087 in corporation's subsidiary), Hunt v. Robinson, 852 F.2d 786 (4th Cir.1988) (employer refused to honor earlier promise to tender securities to employee as part of employment contract), and Citibank, N.A. v. K-H Corp., 745 F.Supp. 899 (S.D.N.Y.1990) (in commercial lending transaction, sole shareholder of corporation misrepresented ability to…
cited Cited "see" DeSalle v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.
D. Conn. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 935 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Griffin v. McNiff
S.D.N.Y. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 943, n. 23 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984); Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 683 F.Supp. 1463, 1474-76 (S.D.N.Y.1988).
cited Cited "see" Epstein v. Haas Securities Corp.
S.D.N.Y. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 943 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Huang v. Sentinel Government Securities
S.D.N.Y. · 1989 · signal: see · confidence high
See generally Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930 , 943 n. 23 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Kenneth J. Wilson v. Ruffa & Hanover, P.C. (2×)
2d Cir. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930 , 943 & n. 23 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Department of Economic Development v. Arthur Andersen & Co. (U.S.A.)
S.D.N.Y. · 1988 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 945 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" In Re Gas Reclamation, Inc. Securities Litigation (2×) also: Cited "see, e.g."
S.D.N.Y. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 552 F.Supp. 439 (S.D.N.Y.1982), rev’d on other grounds, 726 F.2d 930 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984); IIT, 619 F.2d at 923-24 .
cited Cited "see" Westmac, Inc. v. Lon Smith
6th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co., 734 F.2d 1157, 1162-63 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Westmac, Inc. v. Smith
6th Cir. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Cleveland v. Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co., 734 F.2d 1157, 1162-63 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.
S.D.N.Y. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 941-42, 944-45 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984); cf. United States v. Naftalin, 441 U.S. 768 , 773 n. 4, 99 S.Ct. 2077 , 2081-82 n. 4, 60 L.Ed.2d 624 (1979) (”[W]e are not necessarily persuaded that ‘in’ is narrower than 'in connection with.’ ”) The New Mexico statute closely tracks the language of Rule 10b-5, except for the absence from the statute of a jurisdictional act requirement.
discussed Cited "see" Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,024 Futura Development Corporation v. Centex Corporation
1st Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen and Co., 726 F.2d 930 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984); Exchange National Bank v. Touche Ross and Co., 544 F.2d 1126 (2d Cir.1976.) As might be expected, the conceptual basis of the three tests and the considerations examined by the courts in applying the tests tend to be very similar although the focus is slightly different.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Marilyn GALDIERI-AMBROSINI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NATIONAL REALTY & DEVELOPMENT CORP., Defendant-Appellee
2d Cir. · 1998 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Konik v. Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center, 733 F.2d 1007 , 1013 n. 4 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984); Mattivi v. South African Marine Corp., “Huguenot”, 618 F.2d 163 , 166 & n. 2 (2d Cir.1980).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Securities & Exchange Commission v. Feminella
S.D.N.Y. · 1996 · signal: see also · confidence low
Santa Fe Indus., Inc. v. Green, 430 U.S. 462, 477-78 , 97 S.Ct. 1292, 1302-03 , 51 L.Ed.2d 480 (1977); see also Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Smith Barney, Harris Upham & Co., Inc., 770 F.Supp. 176, 180 (S.D.N.Y.1991) (“the relevant inquiry is whether defendants’ alleged fraud deprived plaintiff of information that might have been useful to it in deciding whether to purchase or sell securities which it actually did purchase or sell”).' In Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984), the Second…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Audell Petroleum Corp. v. Suburban Paraco Corp.
E.D.N.Y · 1995 · signal: see also · confidence low
Compare Blaine v. Meineke Discount Muffler Shops, Inc., 670 F.Supp. 1107, 1113 (D.Conn.1987) (allegation of anticompetitive effect not required because such effects are presumed) and Nordic Bank PLC v. Trend Group, Ltd., 619 F.Supp. 542, 558 (S.D.N.Y.1985) (allegation of anticompetitive effects not required) with Telerate Sys., Inc., 689 F.Supp. at 234 (anticompetitive effects as distinct element), Posa, Inc. v. Miller Brewing Co., 642 F.Supp. 1198, 1209 (E.D.N.Y.1986) (distinct element), and Consolidated Terminal Sys., 535 F.Supp. at 231 ; see also Gonzalez, 880 F.2d at 1516-17 (anticompetiti…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Banco Espanol De Credito Banesto Banking Corporation Banco Totta & Acores Girozentrale Und Bank Der Osterreichischen Sparkassen Ag Harmony Gold Ltd. Hong Kong International Commercial Bank of China Monroe Bank & Trust Phelps Dodge Corporation Saudi American Bank State Street Bank & Trust Company, as Master Trustee for the Retirement Plans of Atlantic Richfield Company and Certain of Its Subsidiaries v. Security Pacific National Bank Security Pacific Merchant Bank, Hachijuni Bank, Ltd. v. Security Pacific National Bank Security Pacific Merchant Bank
2d Cir. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Reves v. Ernst & Young, 494 U.S. 56, 65 , 110 S.Ct. 945, 951 , 108 L.Ed.2d 47 (1990) (citing Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 939 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Banco Espanol de Credito v. Security Pacific National Bank
2d Cir. · 1992 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Reves v. Ernst & Young, 494 U.S. 56, 65 , 110 S.Ct. 945, 951 , 108 L.Ed.2d 47 (1990) (citing Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 939 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984)).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Varnberg v. Minnick
S.D.N.Y. · 1991 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 938 (2d Cir.) (context required that replacement notes evidencing loans by commercial banks to finance current operations of borrower not be deemed “securities”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984). 29 A party such as Gail or Robert Varnberg asserting that a given note with a maturity of less than nine months is within the 1934 Act has the burden of demonstrating that “the context otherwise requires.” Exchange Nat’l Bank, 544 F.2d at 1137-38 (emphasis in original).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Arnold R. Vasbinder, Cross-Appellee v. Gordon Ambach, Basil Y. Scott, and Richard M. Switzer, Basil Y. Scott and Richard M. Switzer, Cross-Appellants
2d Cir. · 1991 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Konik v. Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center, 733 F.2d 1007 , 1013 n. 4 (2d Cir.) (quoting Mattivi v. South African Marine Corp., “Huguenot”, 618 F.2d at 166 & n. 2), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984); Ebker v. Tan Jay International, Ltd., 739 F.2d 812 , 824 n. 15 (2d Cir.1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Caucus Distributors v. DEPT. OF COMMERCE
Alaska · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 939 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984) (adding to the laundry list a commercial bank loan to finance current operations of a borrower's business); Equitable Life Assur.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Caucus Distributors, Inc. v. State, Department of Commerce & Economic Development, Division of Banking, Securities & Corporations
Alaska · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 939 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984) (adding to the laundry list a commercial bank loan to finance current operations of a borrower’s business); Equitable Life Assur.
cited Cited "see, e.g." Gurwara v. Lyphomed, Inc.
N.D. Ill. · 1990 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also, Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 943 (2nd Cir.1984) (Friendly, J.), cert. denied 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Powell v. Gardner
4th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Konik v. Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center, 733 F.2d 1007, 1013 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Powell v. Gardner
10th Cir. · 1989 · signal: see, e.g. · confidence low
See, e.g., Konik v. Champlain Valley Physicians Hospital Medical Center, 733 F.2d 1007, 1013 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Developer's Mortgage Co. v. TransOhio Savings Bank
S.D. Ohio · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Exchange Nat'l Bank v. Touche Ross & Co., 544 F.2d 1126, 1132, 1137-38 (2d Cir.1976); see also Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 939 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984); cf. American Bank & Trust Co. v. Wallace, 702 F.2d 93, 94 (6th Cir.1983) (dicta) (noting that "[i]f construed literally, the 1934 Act would cover no note ... with a maturity not exceeding nine months, and would cover all notes with a maturity in excess of nine months," but the court nonetheless stated that it would not construe the statute literally). 28 .Expres…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Klaus Zoelsch v. Arthur Andersen & Co (2×)
D.C. Cir. · 1987 · signal: see also · confidence low
Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Drysdale Securities Corp., 801 F.2d 13, 20 (2d Cir. 1986), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 952 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1001 (1987); see also Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 943 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884 , 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984); First Fed.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Rooney Pace, Inc. v. Reid
S.D.N.Y. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id.; see Walling v. Beverly Enterprises, 476 F.2d 393 (9th Cir.1973); Carroll v. First National Bank of Lincolnwood, 413 F.2d 353 (7th Cir.1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 1003 , 90 S.Ct. 552 , 24 L.Ed.2d 494 (1970); see also Chemical Bank v. Arthur Andersen & Co., 726 F.2d 930, 944 n. 24 (2d Cir.) (noting Brod), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 253 , 83 L.Ed.2d 190 (1984). 9 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Garlam Enterprises Corp.
v.
Autoridad de Carreteras de Puerto Rico
No. 84-255.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 9, 1984.
469 U.S. 883
Published

Sup. Ct. P. R. Certiorari denied.