green
Positive treatment
4.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 9 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Georgiou
See United States v. Andrus, 775 F.2d 825, 843 (7th Cir.1985) (“ ‘Mere speculation that a government file may contain Brady material is not sufficient to require a remand for in camera inspection, much less reversal for a new trial.’”) (quoting United States v. Navarro, 737 F.2d 625 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1020 , 105 S.Ct. 438 , 83 L.Ed.2d 364 (1984)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. David Earnest
See United States v. Navarro, 737 F.2d 625, 631 (7th Cir.1984), certiorari denied, 469 U.S. 1020 , 105 S.Ct. 438 , 83 L.Ed.2d 364 (reasoning that Brady claim is speculative when defendant gave no indication of existence of Brady material in file and contents of file were not made part of record).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hodgkiss
See United States v. Navarro, 737 F.2d 625, 631 (7th Cir.) (“Mere speculation that a government file may contain Brady material is not sufficient to require a remand for in camera inspection, much less reversal for a new trial.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1020 , 105 S.Ct. 438 , 83 L.Ed.2d 364 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Quintanilla
See United States v. Navarro, 737 F.2d 625, 630-31 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1020 , 105 S.Ct. 438 , 83 L.Ed.2d 364 (1984) (speculative assertion *697 that impeaching material may be in a government file did not warrant order to disclose file’s contents); United States v. McDonnell, 696 F.Supp. 356, 363-64 (N.D.Ill.1988) (“[g]overnment need not produce raw investigative files on its witnesses from [various state and federal agencies]”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lov-It Creamery, Inc.
See United States v. Navarro, 737 F.2d 625, 631 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1020 , 105 S.Ct. 438 , 83 L.Ed.2d 364 (1984) (mere speculation by defendant regarding relevance of undisclosed material is insufficient to require remand to court for in camera review); see also United States v. Robinson, 585 F.2d 274, 281 (7th Cir.1978) (Brady request pertaining to 10,000 pages of government documents will not be reviewed by court *1553 unless defendant identifies with reasonable particularity the evidence to be considered).
discussed
Cited "see"
Johnny Lee Kirby v. Michael Dutton, Warden William Leech, Attorney General
See Dankert v. Wharton, 733 F.2d 1537 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 438 , 83 L.Ed.2d 364 (1984); Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984); Williams v. Missouri, 640 F.2d 140, 144 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 999 , 101 S.Ct. 2328 , 68 L.Ed.2d 849 (1981); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROY LEE HODGKISS
See United States v. Navarro, 737 F.2d 625, 631 (7th Cir.) (“Mere speculation that a government file may contain Brady material is not sufficient to require a remand for in camera inspection, much less reversal for a new trial.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1020 , 105 S. Ct. 438 , 83 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marian Fusko
“The verity that the trier of fact may and must make credibility determinations applies with full force to entrapment issues.” United States v. Garcia, 562 F.2d 411, 415 (7th Cir.1977); see also United States v. Navarro, 737 F.2d 625, 636 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1020 , 105 S.Ct. 438 , 83 L.Ed.2d 364 (1984); United States v. Townsend, 555 F.2d 152 , 157 n. 8 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 897 , 98 S.Ct. 277 , 54 L.Ed. 2d 184 (1977); United States v. Pingleton, 458 F.2d 722, 724 (7th Cir.1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McDonnell
See Morgan v. Salamack, 735 F.2d 354, 358 (2d Cir.1984); see also United States v. Navarro, 737 F.2d 625, 630-631 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1020 , 105 S.Ct. 438 , 83 L.Ed.2d 364 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lucien
v.
Seidenfeld
v.
Seidenfeld
No. 84-5161.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 1984.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.