green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
12.1 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 3 distinct cases, last quoted 1999 ·
…t is only after a full investigation of all the mitigating circumstances that counsel can make an informed, tactical decision about which information would be the most helpful to the client's case
⚠ not in text
Topic ↗
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Samra v. State
t is only after a full investigation of all the mitigating circumstances that counsel can make an informed, tactical decision about which information would be the most helpful to the client's case
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Roy v. State
t is only after a full investigation of all the mitigating circumstances that counsel can make an informed, tactical decision about which information would be the most helpful to the client's case
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Cole v. State
to the extent that the majority found that defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the identity of his vehicle, we disagree
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Saffold v. State
t is only after a full investigation of all of the mitigating circumstances that counsel can make an informed, tactical decision about which information would be the most helpful to the client's case
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Dill v. State
t is only after a full investigation of all the mitigating circumstances that counsel can make an informed, tactical decision about which information would be the most helpful to the client's case
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Mathis v. State
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
In our view, insertion of the key, without opening the door to look into the room, is a “minimal intrusion, justified by founded suspicion and in furtherance of the legitimate interests of crime investigation_” Id. at 445 (citations omitted).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Dumbsky v. State
"The agent ... did not search the Chrysler but merely identified it as belonging to defendant." Id. at 445 (emphasis in original).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sutton v. Bell
See Martin v. Maggio, 711 F.2d 1273, 1287 (5th Cir.1983) (finding that the Constitution simply does not require a sentencing jury to list the mitigating circumstances), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 447 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984); Austin v. Bell, 927 F.Supp. 1058, 1063 (M.D.Tenn.1996) (holding that specific written findings of mitigating circumstances are not constitutionally required).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Johnny Franklin Patrick
See U.S. v. DeBardeleben, 740 F.2d 440, 447 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 448 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984) (upholding sentence based on extraneous evidence in part because the defendant did “not suggest what rebuttal he could make other than his blanket denial, which the court had already heard”).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael F. Goodapple
See United States v. Hattaway, 740 F.2d 1419, 1425 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, Curran v. United States, 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 448 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984), and cert. denied, Hattaway v. United States, 469 U.S. 1089 , 105 S.Ct. 599 , 83 L.Ed.2d 708 (1984) (evidence is “intricately intertwined” when exclusion of it leaves a conceptual and chronological void).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Andrew Jackson Smith, Isaac Hicks, Samuel Smith, James Sawyer
See U.S. v. Hattaway, 740 F.2d 1419, 1425 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 448 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wesley Bucey
See United States v. Hattaway, 740 F.2d 1419, 1425 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1089 , 105 S.Ct. 599 , 83 L.Ed.2d 708 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 448 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Cole
See United States v. Hattaway, 740 F.2d 1419, 1424 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 448 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984); United States v. Ras, 713 F.2d 311, 315 (7th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dewey E. Coleman v. Henry Risley, Warden, Montana State Prison, and Michael T. Greely, Attorney General for the State of Montana
(2×)
See Martin v. Maggio, 711 F.2d 1273, 1286-87 (5th Cir.1983) (affirming, Martin v. Blackburn, 521 F.Supp. 685, 715 (E.D.La.1981)), reh'g denied, 739 F.2d 184 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 447 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bucey
See United States v. Hattaway, 740 F.2d 1419, 1425 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1089 , 105 S.Ct. 599 , 83 L.Ed.2d 708 (1984), cert. denied sub nom., Curran v. United States, 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 448 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Loyd
See Martin v. Maggio, 711 F.2d 1273 (5th Cir. 1983), cert. denied, ___ U.S.___, 105 S.Ct. 447 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Castellano
See United States v. Hattaway, 740 F.2d 1419, 1424 (7th Cir.) (“strong judicial policy favors joint trial of defendants where largely the same evidence would be admitted in separate trials of each defendant”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 448 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Roberts v. State
See also Martin v. Maggio, 711 F.2d 1273, 1280 (5th Cir.1983), rehearing denied, 739 F.2d 184 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 447 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984); Pickens v. Lockhart, 714 F.2d 1455, 1467 (8th Cir.1983) (‘It is only after a full investigation of all the mitigating circumstances that counsel can make an informed, tactical decision about which information would be the most helpful to the client’s case’).” “ ‘Dill v. State, 484 So.2d 491, 498 (Ala.Cr.App.1985) (emphasis original).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Payne v. State
See also Martin v. Maggio, 711 F.2d 1273, 1280 (5th Cir.1983), rehearing denied, 739 F.2d 184 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 447 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984); Pickens v. Lockhart, 714 F.2d 1455, 1467 (8th Cir.1983) ("It is only after a full investigation of all the mitigating circumstances that counsel can make an informed, tactical decision about which information would be the most helpful to the client's case").' " Dill v. State, 484 So.2d 491, 498 (Ala. Cr.App.1985) (emphasis original).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Samra v. State
See also Martin v. Maggio, 711 F.2d 1273, 1280 (5th Cir.1983), rehearing denied, 739 F.2d 184 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 447 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984); Pickens v. Lockhart, 714 F.2d 1455, 1467 (8th Cir.1983) (‘[I]t is only after a full investigation of all the mitigating circumstances that counsel can make an informed, tactical decision about which information would be the most helpful to the client’s case’).” Dill v. State, 484 So.2d 491, 498 (Ala.Cr.App.1985) (emphasis original).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mauricio Londono-Villa
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Eisenberg, 596 F.2d 522, 526 (2d Cir.) (under 18 U.S.C. § 2314 , knowledge that securities transported in interstate commerce not necessary), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 843 , 100 S.Ct. 85 , 62 L.Ed.2d 56 (1979); United States v. Green, 523 F.2d 229, 233-34 (2d Cir.1975) (under 18 U.S.C. § 659 , “knowledge of interstate or foreign character of the goods” not required), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1074 , 96 S.Ct. 858 , 47 L.Ed.2d 84 (1976); see also United States v. Hattaway, 740 F.2d 1419, 1427 (7th Cir.) (collecting cases), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 448 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barnes v. State
See also Wiley, 517 So.2d at 1378 (totality of the circumstances must be considered) (citing Martin v. Maggio, 711 F.2d 1273, 1280 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 447 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lashmett
See also United States v. Hattaway, 740 F.2d 1419 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 448 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Claudia A. Ford
See also United States v. Hattaway, 740 F.2d 1419, 1424-25 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 448 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Lee Grandstaff, Douglas Wayne Brown
See also United States v. DeBardeleben, 740 F.2d 440, 444 (6th Cir.) (”[t]o the extend that the [Portillo-Reyes ] majority found that defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the identity of his vehicle, we disagree"), cert. denied 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 448 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984), cited with approval in White, 766 F.2d at 1331 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. David Lee Grandstaff, Douglas Wayne Brown
See also United States v. DeBardeleben, 740 F.2d 440, 444 (6th Cir.) (”[t]o the extent that the [PortilloReyes] majority found that defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the identity of his vehicle, we disagree”), cert. denied 469 U.S. 1028 , 105 S.Ct. 448 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984), cited with approval in White, 766 F.2d at 1331 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
William Lee Thompson, Cross-Appellee v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, Cross-Appellant
Gray v. Lucas, 677 F.2d 1086, 1093-94 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 910 , 103 S.Ct. 1886 , 76 L.Ed.2d 815 (1983); see also Martin v. Maggio, 711 F.2d 1273, 1280 (5th Cir.1983) (defendant’s “instruction that his lawyers obtain an acquittal or the death penalty did not justify his lawyer’s failure to investigate the intoxication defense____ Uncounselled jailhouse bravado, without more, should not deprive a defendant of his right to counsel’s better-informed advice.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 447 , 83 L.Ed.2d 373 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
DeBardeleben
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 84-5498.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 13, 1984.
Between, Brennan, Certiorari, Involved, Ninth, Resolution, Respect, Settle, Sixth, White.
Published
C. A. 6th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice White, joined by Justice Brennan, would grant certiorari to settle the conflict between the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit and the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with respect to the proper resolution of the issue involved in this case.