green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
10.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1988 ·
…if no objection is raised, the instructions cannot be challenged on appeal unless great injustice would result
at p. 516
⚠ not in text
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1986 ·
…in the absence of special interrogatories we presume the existence of factual findings and legal conclusions necessary to support the verdict reached by the jury.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (verbatim quote)
Allen Organ Company, Cross-Appellee v. Kimball International, Inc., MacMillan Inc., and Conn Keyboards, Inc., Cross-Appellants
(2×)
also: Cited as authority (quoted)
if no objection is raised, the instructions cannot be challenged on appeal unless great injustice would result
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Complaint of Three Buoys Houseboat Vacations USA
(3×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
present navigability in fact is the linchpin of admiralty jurisdiction
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Central Telecommunications, Inc. v. Tci Cablevision, Inc., Community Telecommunications, Inc. And Telecommunications, Inc.
(2×)
in the absence of special interrogatories we presume the existence of factual findings and legal conclusions necessary to support the verdict reached by the jury.
discussed
Cited "see"
(PC) Barela v. Stockton Police Department
See Dooley v. Reiss, 736 F.2d 1392 , 1394-95 21 (9th Cir.) (where government officials conspired unsuccessfully to prevent plaintiff from 22 exercising First Amendment right, there was no redressable constitutional violation because of the 23 absence of an actual constitutional deprivation), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 (1984). 24 Plaintiff does not allege the harassment occurred in retaliation for the exercise of any First 25 Amendment right.
cited
Cited "see"
Rodriguez v. Cruz
See Chapman v. National Aeronautics & Space Admin., 736 F.2d 238, 241 (5th Cir.1984) (per curiam), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 , 105 S.Ct. 517 , 83 L.Ed.2d 406 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Terry Lee Barker v. Marilyn Carr Susanne Ward Denise Randall
See id. 6 Second, in order to state a claim under section 1985(2), a plaintiff must show either (1) the existence of a conspiracy to use threat, force, or intimidation of a witness or party to obstruct justice in federal court, Dooley v. Reiss, 736 F.2d 1392, 1395-96 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 (1984), or (2) racial or class-based invidious discrimination, Usher v. City of Los Angeles, 828 F.2d 556, 561 (9th Cir.1987). 7 In order to state a claim under the first part of section 1985(2), the plaintiff must show that the defendants' action caused an injury to the plaintiff.
discussed
Cited "see"
Barcellos & Wolfsen, Inc. v. Westlands Water District
(2×)
See Clem Perrin Marine Towing, Inc. v. Panama Canal Co., 730 F.2d 186, 188 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1037 , 105 S.Ct. 515 , 83 L.Ed.2d 405 (1984). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Goodwall Construction Co. v. Beers Construction Co.
(2×)
See Bio-Rad, Laboratories, Inc. v. Nicolet Instrument Corp., 739 F.2d 604, 615 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 , 105 S.Ct. 516 , 83 L.Ed.2d 405 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dennis Purtell Marx v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Strawser, 739 F.2d 1226, 1230 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 , 105 S.Ct. 518 , 83 L.Ed.2d 407 (1984) (disputes regarding terms of plea agreement are determined by objective standard).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ronald E. Ting v. United States of America the Federal Bureau of Investigation Drug Enforcement Administration Internal Revenue Service Joe Sheehan
(2×)
See Dooley v. Reiss, 736 F.2d 1392 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 , 105 S.Ct. 518 , 83 L.Ed.2d 407 (1984); Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Dept., 839 F.2d 621 (9th Cir.1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chisum v. Brewco Sales & Manufacturing, Inc.
(2×)
See Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. Nicolet Instrument Corp., 739 F.2d 604 , 222 U.S.P.Q. 654 (Fed.Cir.) cert. denied 469 U.S. 1038 , 105 S.Ct. 516 , 83 L.Ed.2d 405 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.
(2×)
See Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. Nicolet Instrument Corp., 739 F.2d 604, 617 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 , 105 S.Ct. 516 , 83 L.Ed.2d 405 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Phibro Energy, Inc. v. Empresa De Polimeros De Sines Sarl
See Clem Perrin Marine Towing, Inc. v. Panama Canal Co., 730 F.2d 186, 191 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1037 , 105 S.Ct. 515 , 83 L.Ed.2d 405 (1984); AMF, Inc. v. McDonald’s Corp., 536 F.2d 1167, 1170 (7th Cir.1976). 10 See also Edward G.
cited
Cited "see"
Richard Feliciano-Angulo v. Hon. Hector Rivera-Cruz, Etc.
See Agromayor v. Colberg, 738 F.2d 55, 57 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1037 , 105 S.Ct. 515 , 83 L.Ed.2d 405 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pharmacia Ab and Pharmacia, Inc. v. Ventrex Laboratories, Inc. And Ventrex Reference Laboratories, Inc., Defendants/cross-Appellants
See Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. Nicolet Instrument Corp., 739 F.2d 604 , 222 USPQ 654, 657 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 (1984). 8 The party seeking a determination of unenforceability must prove two elements of inequitable conduct by clear and convincing evidence.
discussed
Cited "see"
Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc.
(2×)
See Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. Nicolet Instrument Corp., 739 F.2d 604, 615 , 222 USPQ 654, 662 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 , 105 S.Ct. 516 , 83 L.Ed.2d 405 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc.
(2×)
See Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. Nicolet Instrument Corp., 739 F.2d 604, 615 , 222 USPQ 654, 662 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 , 105 S.Ct. 516 , 83 L.Ed.2d 405 (1984). 131 Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 51, the failure of Safety to proffer timely, specific objections to the instructions precludes our consideration of any such objection on appeal absent great injustice.
cited
Cited "see"
Andrew Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co., Defendant-Third Party Cross-Appellant, Cross-Appellee v. Rowandrill, Inc., Defendant-Third Party Cross-Appellant, Cross-Appellee v. Bristow Offshore Helicopters, Inc., Third Party Cross
See Clem Perrin Marine Towing, Inc. v. Panama Canal Co., 730 F.2d 186, 188 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 515 , 83 L.Ed.2d 405 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Fontenot v. Mesa Petroleum Co.
See Clem Perrin Marine Towing, Inc. v. Panama Canal Co., 730 F.2d 186, 188 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 515 , 83 L.Ed.2d 405 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rich v. Pereira
See, e.g., Dooley v. Reiss, 736 F.2d 24 1392 , 1394–95 (9th Cir.) (affirming dismissal of Section 1983 action alleging police coverup 25 where plaintiffs had in fact succeeded in obtaining redress for illegal police conduct in prior 26 section 1983 action), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 (1984); Landrigan v. City of Warwick, 628 F.2d 27 1 736, 742 (1st Cir.1980) (affirming dismissal of Section 1983 claim alleging conspiratorial police 2 coverup where plaintiff had in fact prevailed in previous state court action based on illegal police 3 conduct).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Feliciano v. United States
See, e.g., United States v. Strawser, 739 F.2d 1226 , 1231 n. 5 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 , 105 S.Ct. 518 , 83 L.Ed.2d 407 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Opinion No.
See, e.g. , Land and Lake Tours, Inc., v. Lewis, 738 F.2d. 961 (8th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 (holding Lake Hamilton "navigable" because the part of the Ouachita River which was obstructed to create the lake was navigable).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gregory Swigert
As we explained in United States v. Yanez, 985 F.2d 371, 376 (7th Cir. 1993), “ ‘the interpretation of disputed terms in a plea agreement should be determined by the district court to which the plea was originally submitted based on “objective standards,” and ... where the district court has made such a determination, it should be set aside only if clearly erroneous.’” (quoting United States v. Fields, 766 F.2d 1161, 1168 (7th Cir.1985)); see also United States v. Strawser, 739 F.2d 1226, 1229-30 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 , 105 S.Ct. 518 , 83 L.Ed.2d 407 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gudenau v. Bierria
See, e.g., Clem Perrin Marine Towing, Inc. v. Panama Canal Co., 730 F.2d 186, 191 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1037, 105 S0.Ct. 515, 83 L.Ed.2d 405 (1984); R.C.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Masayesva v. Zah
See also, Chapman v. National Aeronautics and Space Admin., 736 F.2d 238, 241 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 , 105 S.Ct. 517 , 83 L.Ed.2d 406 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
BIC Leisure Products, Inc. v. Windsurfing International, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. Nicolet Instrument Corp., 739 F.2d 604, 616 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 , 105 S.Ct. 516 , 83 L.Ed.2d 405 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kaufman Company, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Lantech, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. Nicolet Instrument Corp., 739 F.2d 604, 616 , 222 USPQ 654, 663 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 , 105 S.Ct. 516 , 83 L.Ed.2d 405 (1984). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ziggity Systems, Inc. v. Val Watering Systems
(2×)
See, e.g., Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc. v. Nicolet Instrument Corp., 739 F.2d 604, 611-12 (Fed.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 , 105 S.Ct. 516 , 83 L.Ed.2d 405 (1984); Lindemann Maschinenfabrik Gmbh v. American Hoist and Derrick Co., 730 F.2d 1452, 1461 (Fed.Cir. 1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Micro Motion, Incorporated v. Kane Steel Co., Inc., Cross/appellant
See, e.g., Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. v. Nicolet Instrument Corp., 739 F.2d 604 , 222 USPQ 654 (Fed.Cir.) (proof of no acceptable substitutes), cert. denied, 469 U.s. 1038, 105 S.Ct. 516 , 83 L.Ed.2d 405 (1984); Gyromat Corp. v. Champion Spark Plug Co., 735 F.2d 549 , 222 USPQ 4 (Fed.Cir.1984) (no alternative competing source where only four or five machines sold); Central Soya Co. v. Geo.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Parviz Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Department
See, e.g., Dooley v. Reiss, 736 F.2d 1392, 1394-95 (9th Cir.) (affirming dismissal of section 1983 action alleging police cover-up where plaintiffs had in fact succeeded in obtaining redress for illegal police conduct in prior section 1983 action), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 , 105 S.Ct. 518 , 83 L.Ed.2d 407 (1984); Landrigan v. City of Warwick, 628 F.2d 736, 742 (1st Cir.1980) (affirming dismissal of section 1983 claim alleging conspiratorial police cover-up where plaintiff had in fact prevailed in previous state court action based on illegal police conduct).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Karim-Panahi v. Los Angeles Police Department
See, e.g., Dooley v. Reiss, 736 F.2d 1392, 1394-96 (9th Cir.) (affirming dismissal of section 1983 action alleging police cover-up where plaintiffs had in fact succeeded in obtaining redress for illegal police conduct in prior section 1983 action), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 , 105 S.Ct. 518 , 83 L.Ed.2d 407 (1984); Landrigan v. City of Warwick, 628 F.2d 736, 742 (1st Cir.1980) (affirming dismissal of section 1983 claim alleging conspiratorial police cover-up where plaintiff had in fact prevailed in previous state court action based on illegal police conduct).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ross J. Laningham v. United States Navy
Instead, the violation must be so “patently egregious and unlawful” that anyone undertaking the conduct should have known it “unlawful.” Wisdom v. Department of Hous. & Urban Dev., 713 F.2d 422 , 425 (8th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1021 , 104 S.Ct. 1272 , 79 L.Ed.2d 678 (1984); see also Chapman v. National Aeronautics & Space Admin., 736 F.2d 238, 242-43 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1038 , 105 S.Ct. 517 , 83 L.Ed.2d 406 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Podrog
v.
Waring, Cox, James, Sklar & Allen
v.
Waring, Cox, James, Sklar & Allen
No. 84-560.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Nov 26, 1984.
Cited by 4 opinions | Published
Sup. Ct. Tenn. Certiorari denied.