green
Positive treatment
7.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
United States v. Keller
But see United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984). 10 .
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Knott
But cf. United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1010 (2d Cir.) (federal courts have no inherent power to order restitution or to suspend the imposition of a sentence), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Buckner v. Westmoreland Coal Co. (In Re Westmoreland Coal Co.)
S.Ct. 98, 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Nazon
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009-10 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Farid Ali
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lilly
Since probation, like a shadow, always accompanies a suspended sentence, see 18 U.S.C.A. § 3651 (West 1985) (court “may suspend the imposition or execution of the sentence and place the defendant on probation”) (emphasis supplied); see United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1010-11 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984) (suspended sentence without probation a nullity); McHugh v. United States, 230 F.2d 252, 255 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 351 U.S. 966 , 76 S.Ct. 1030 , 100 L.Ed. 1486 (1956) (suspension of sentence required to support order of probation);…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven E. Rogers
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1008-09 (2d Cir.) (fraudulent verification letter sent to Government two years after defendant had received improperly obtained money from Government was part of scheme to defraud Government), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Ches v. Archer
See Bugher v. Feightner, 722 F.2d 1356 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 98 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Leona M. Helmsley, Joseph v. Licari and Frank J. Turco, Leona M. Helmsley
(2×)
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1010-11 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul A. Bilzerian
(2×)
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984); United States v. Silver, 235 F.2d 375, 377 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 352 U.S. 880 , 77 S.Ct. 102 , 1 L.Ed.2d 80 (1956).
cited
Cited "see"
Oregon Laborers-Employers Trust Funds v. Pacific Fence & Wire Co.
See Bugher v. Feightner, 722 F.2d 1356, 1360 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 98 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Elston Ransom
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1011 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Kelly
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1010 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company, a Corporation, Plaintiff v. Linda Ann Digregorio
See Bugher v. Feightner, 722 F.2d 1356, 1360 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 98 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Turoff
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1008 (2d Cir.), (late mailing lulled victim of scheme into believing all was well), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984); United States v. Pick, 724 F.2d 297, 300 (2d Cir.1983).
cited
Cited "see"
Swanigan v. Western Airlines, Inc.
See Hodges v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co., 728 F.2d 414, 417 (10th Cir.), cert. denied 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Pinkie A. Brown v. Retirement Committee of the Briggs & Stratton Retirement Plan, and Briggs & Stratton Corporation
See Bugher v. Feightner, 722 F.2d 1356, 1359 (7th Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 98 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Barrett
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009 (2d Cir.) (and cases cited there *1351 in), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. A. Wendell Wheadon
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1010 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ianniello
See United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1008-09 (2d Cir.), cert.denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Indiana State Council Of Roofers Health And Welfare Fund v. Adams Roofing Company Of Kokomo, Inc.
See Bugher v. Feightner, 722 F.2d 1356, 1359-60 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 98 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Della WHITE, Roy S. White, Defendants-Appellants
Compare United States v. Pruitt, 702 F.2d 152, 155 (8th Cir. *1535 1983) (holding that materiality is an essential element of a section 287 charge) and United States v. Snider, 502 F.2d 645 , 652 n. 12 (4th Cir.1974) (same) with United States v. Parsons, 967 F.2d 452, 455 (10th Cir.1992) (“[M]ateriality is not an element required by 18 U.S.C. § 287”) and United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009 (2d Cir.) (“Since the language of § 287 in no way suggests that materiality is an element of the offense, we conclude that proof of materiality was not required.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 8…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bricklayers & Allied Craftsmen International Union Local 33 Benefit Funds v. America's Marble Source, Inc.
See, e.g., Bugher v. Feightner, 722 F.2d 1356 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 98 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bricklayers And Allied Craftsmen International Union Local 33 Benefit Funds v. America's Marble Source, Inc.
See, e.g., Bugher v. Feightner, 722 F.2d 1356 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 98 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
GLM CORP. v. Klein
For example, the use of the mails can be held to have been “for the purpose of executing” an alleged fraudulent scheme if accomplishing the scheme’s purpose could be found to have depended in some way on the information and documents which were passed through the mail, i.e., if “the thing mailed was an integral part of execution of the scheme....” United States v. Kent, 608 F.2d 542, 546 (5th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 936 , 100 S.Ct. 2153 , 64 L.Ed. 2d 788 (1980); see also United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1008-09 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Perlmutter
See, e.g., United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1009 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 822 , 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Charles Cannon, in Re United States of America
Id. at 41-52, 37 S.Ct. at 74-78 ; see also United States v. Elkin, 731 F.2d 1005, 1010 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984) (absent statutory authority, a court may not decline to impose a sentence).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bento v. ITO Corp. of Rhode Island
See, e.g., Hodges v. The Atcheson, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., 728 F.2d 414, 416 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 97 , 83 L.Ed.2d 43 (1984) Ernst v. Indiana Bell Telephone Co., Inc., 717 F.2d 1036, 1038 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. - — , 104 S.Ct. 707 , 79 L.Ed.2d 171 (1984); Painter v. Horne Bros., Inc., 710 F.2d 143, 144 (4th Cir.1983); Meyerson v. Arizona, 709 F.2d 1235, 1238 (9th Cir. 1983), vacated on other grounds, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1584 , 80 L.Ed.2d 118 (1984); Davis v. Ohio Barge Line, Inc., 697 F.2d 549, 556 (3rd Cir.1983); Davis v. United Air Line…
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Richard I, Inc., dba Richard I School of Beauty Culture
v.
Ambach, Commissioner of Education of New York
v.
Ambach, Commissioner of Education of New York
No. 83-1847.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Published
Ct. App. N. Y. Certiorari denied.