green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
7.7 score
“although the purpose of use undoubtedly is commercial, this fact alone does not defeat a fair use defense ... almost all newspapers, books and magazines are published by commercial enterprises that seek a profit”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
American Geophysical Union v. Texaco Inc.
although the purpose of use undoubtedly is commercial, this fact alone does not defeat a fair use defense ... almost all newspapers, books and magazines are published by commercial enterprises that seek a profit
cited
Cited "see"
Gordon & Breach Science Publishers S.A. v. American Institute of Physics
See Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. General Signal Corp., 724 F.2d 1044, 1046 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Twin Peaks Productions, Inc. v. Publications International, Ltd.
See Salinger v. Random House, Inc., 811 F.2d 90, 96 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 484 U.S. 890 , 108 S.Ct. 213 , 98 L.Ed.2d 177 (1987). 20 We have found fair use in works that are plainly "commercial." See Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. General Signal Corp., 724 F.2d 1044, 1049 (2d Cir.1983) (advertisement disclosing Consumer Reports recommendation), reh'g denied, 730 F.2d 47 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984); Warner Bros., Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., 720 F.2d 231, 242 (2d Cir.1983) (television series parodying Superman); Elsm…
cited
Cited "see"
Basic Books, Inc. v. Kinko's Graphics Corp.
See Consumers Union v. General Signal Corp., 724 F.2d 1044, 1049 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Bhan v. NME Hospitals, Inc.
See Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc. v. Instromedix, Inc., 725 F.2d 537, 546 (9th Cir.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bhan v. Nme Hospitals, Inc.
See Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc. v. Instromedix, Inc., 725 F.2d 537, 546 (9th Cir.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984). 48 Neither of these cases explicitly controls the issue Bhan raises.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re David Larry Davis, Debtor. Charles A. Gower, Trustee v. Farmers Home Administration
Accord Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc. v. Instromedix, Inc., 125 F.2d 537, 542-47 (9th Cir.) (en banc) (Kennedy, J.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984); see also Commodity Futures Trading Comm'n v. Schor, 478 U.S. 833, 848 , 106 S.Ct. 3245, 3255 , 92 L.Ed.2d 675 (1986) (“as a personal right, Article Ill’s guarantee of an impartial and independent federal adjudication is subject to waiver”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mark Murret, Nick Congemi, Westley West, Sr., Tommy Powell and Anita Allen v. The City of Kenner, the Kenner Police Department
See Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of Am. v. Instromedix, Inc., 725 F.2d 537, 545 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984) (noting that the limits of section 636(c)(6) have not been explored).
cited
Cited "see"
Securities & Exchange Commission v. American Principals Holdings, Inc. (In re San Vicente Medical Partners Ltd.)
See Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America v. Instromedix, Inc., 725 F.2d 537, 541-43 (9th Cir.)(en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed. 2d 45 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re San Vicente Medical Partners Limited, Debtor. Securities and Exchange Commission v. American Principals Holdings, Inc., San Vicente Medical Partners, Ltd., Debtor-In-Possession-Appellant v. Ashley S. Orr, Receiver of American Principals Corporation, a California Corporation, Receiver-Appellee
See Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America v. Instromedix, Inc., 725 F.2d 537, 541-43 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984). 22 There is no question that the parties voluntarily entered into the stipulation which the district court construed as consent for Orr's claim to be determined by a magistrate.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lance H. Mortensen
See United States v. Dobey, 751 F.2d 1140, 1142-43 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 52 (1985) (applying to criminal cases the Ninth Circuit’s civil case holding in Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America v. Instromedix, 725 F.2d 537, 541 (9th Cir.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984), “that parties to a case or controversy in a federal forum are entitled to have the cause determined by Article III judges”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Winford L. Stokes, Jr. v. William M. Armontrout, William L. Webster
See Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773, 774 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984) (petitioner may not raise ineffective assistance of Rule 27.26 counsel as separate claim on federal habeas review because state post-conviction process is civil procedure to which sixth amendment right to effective assistance does not attach).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gentile v. Town of Kure Beach
See Sterngass v. Bowman, 563 F. Supp. 456 (S.D.N.Y.), aff’d mem., 742 F. 2d 1440 (2d Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed. 2d 45 (1984); Eaton v. City of Solon, 598 F. Supp. 1505 (N.D.
discussed
Cited "see"
New Era Publications International, APS v. Henry Holt & Co.
See Consumers Union of the United States, Inc. v. General Signal Corp., 724 F.2d 1044, 1051 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984); Triangle Publications, Inc. v. Knight-Ridder Newspapers, Inc., 626 F.2d 1171, 1177-78 (5th Cir.1980); W.
cited
Cited "see"
Homemakers North Shore, Inc. v. Bowen
See Sun Towers, Inc. v. Heckler, 725 F.2d 315, 336 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
St. Mary's Hospital of Troy v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield Ass'n/Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Greater New York
See Sun Towers, Inc. v. Heckler, 725 F.2d 315 , 325 n. 16 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
St. Mary's Hospital Of Troy v. Blue Cross And Blue Shield Association
See Sun Towers, Inc. v. Heckler, 725 F.2d 315 , 325 n. 16 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984). 9 It is clear that the interest in question was properly disallowed if the Manual sections are valid.
discussed
Cited "see"
Church of Scientology International v. Elmira Mission of the Church of Scientology
Accord, Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. General Signal Corp., 724 F.2d 1044, 1052 (2d Cir.1983) (“A preliminary injunction will issue where an advertisement creates a reasonable likelihood of confusion by consumers regarding the origin or sponsorship of the product”), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984); Coca-Cola Company v. Tropicana Products, Inc., 690 F.2d 312, 317 (2d Cir.1982) (Holding that statistical tests provided “sufficient evidence of a risk of irreparable harm because they demonstrate that a significant number of consumers would be likely …
discussed
Cited "see"
Vista Hill Foundation, Inc. v. Heckler
See generally Sun Towers, Inc. v. Heckler, 725 F.2d 315, 318 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984); Pacific Coast Medical Enterprises v. Harris, 633 F.2d 123, 126-27 (9th Cir.1980) 3 As Vista Hill points out, this is not the appropriate standard for determining whether costs are "necessary and proper" under 42 C.F.R.
discussed
Cited "see"
Vista Hill Foundation, Inc. v. Heckler
See generally Sun Towers, Inc. v. Heckler, 725 F.2d 315, 318 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984); Pacific Coast Medical Enterprises v. Harris, 633 F.2d 123, 126-27 (9th Cir.1980). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Bell & Beckwith v. United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, Donna D. Cannon
See Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic v. Instromedix, Inc., 725 F.2d 537 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984); Wharton-Thomas v. United States, 721 F.2d 922 (3d Cir.1983); see also KMC Co. v. Irving Trust, 757 F.2d 752 (6th Cir.1985) (holding the Magistrate Act constitutional).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Long Island Owner's Ass'n v. Davidson
See, e.g., Sun Towers, Inc. v. Heckler, 7 25 F.2d 315, 331 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984); Rapp v. Felsenthal, 628 S.W.2d 258, 260 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1982, writ ref d n.r.e.).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lens Crafters, Inc. v. Vision World, Inc.
See, e.g., Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. General Signal Corp., 724 F.2d 1044 , 1052 n. 11 (2nd Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984); American Home Products v. Procter & Gamble, supra at 761; American Express Travel Related Services Company, Inc. v. MasterCard International, Inc., 776 F.Supp. 787, 790-91 (S.D.N.Y.1991); Tambrands, Inc. v. Warner-Lambert Co., 673 F.Supp. 1190, 1198 (S.D.N.Y.1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
American Home Products Corp. v. Procter & Gamble Co.
See, e.g., Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. General Signal Corp., 724 F.2d 1044 , 1052 n. 11 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984); American Express Travel Related Serv. v. Mastercard, 776 F.Supp. 787, 791 (S.D.N.Y.1991); Tambrands, Inc. v. Warner-Lambert Co., 673 F.Supp. 1190, 1198 (S.D.N.Y.1987). 14 (b).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arica Institute, Inc. v. Helen Palmer and Harper & Row Publishers, Incorporated
Interviews with Oscar Icha-zo.” Arica, 770 F.Supp. at 195 ; see also Consumers Union of U.S., Inc. v. General Signal Corp., 724 F.2d 1044, 1050 (2d Cir. 1983), cert. den. 469 U.S. 823 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984) (use of 29 words from 2100 word article held insubstantial).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Francis Ordean Reese v. Thomas A. Fulcomer
S.Ct. 747, 750, 21 L.Ed.2d 718 (1969); Wainwright v. Torna, 455 U.S. 586, 587 , 102 S.Ct. 1300, 1301 , 71 L.Ed.2d 475 (1982); see also Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773, 774 (8th Cir.1984) (appellant not entitled to counsel at state post-conviction proceedings because they are civil in nature and not covered by the Sixth Amendment which applies only during the pendency of a criminal case), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. v. Campbell
See also Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. General Signal Corp., 724 F.2d 1044, 1051 (2d *1158 Cir.1983) (“Where the copy does not compete in any way with the original ... concern is absent.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984); Elsmere Music, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc., 482 F.Supp. 741, 746-47 (S.D.N.Y.), aff'd, 623 F.2d 252 (2d Cir.1980) (although defendants appropriated the heart of plaintiffs song, since the copying was a parody it could not fulfill demand for the original version).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mary Lee Orsini v. Virginia Wallace, Warden, Women's Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction
(2×)
See also Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America v. Instromedix, 725 F.2d 537, 541 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 824 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Atwell Junior Conner v. Director of Division of Adult Corrections, State of Iowa
See also Mitchell v. Wyrick, 727 F.2d 773, 774 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984) (§ 2254 does not authorize review of state postconviction relief proceedings).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Irena Narell v. Cynthia Freeman, AKA Bea Fineberg, G.P. Putnam's Sons, Berkeley Publishing Corp.
(2×)
See, e.g., Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. General Signal Corp., 724 F.2d 1044, 1049 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 823 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984) (reporting of factual information in advertisement); MCA, Inc. v. Wilson, 677 F.2d 180, 185 (2d Cir. 1981) (finding parody of copyrighted song not privileged as fair use).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
New Line Cinema Corp. v. Bertlesman Music Group, Inc.
See also Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. General Signal Corp., 724 F.2d 1044, 1049 (2d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 823 , 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984) (commercial use alone does not defeat a fair use defense); Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., 621 F.2d 57, 61 (2d Cir.1980) (it is “relevant” to fair use whether work was used for “commercial exploitation”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Omega Equipment Corp. v. John C. Louis Co. (In Re Omega Equipment Corp.)
See Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co., — U.S. -, -, 105 S.Ct. 3325, 3337-40 , 87 L.Ed.2d 409 (1985); see also Pacemaker Diagnostic Clinic of America, Inc. v. Instromedix, Inc., 725 F.2d 537, 544-46 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 100 , 83 L.Ed.2d 45 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Sun Towers, Inc.
v.
Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services
v.
Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services
No. 83-1867.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: S.D. California (1) · S.D. New York (1)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.