green
Positive treatment
5.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 10 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Fujimoto v. Au
To be sure, courts have on occasion denied stockholders’ suits alleging injury, asserting that the stockholders lacked “standing” to bring such an action because the stockholders, “experiencing no direct harm, possess[ ] no primary right to sue.” Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 732 (3d Cir.1970) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); accord EMI Ltd. v. *140 Bennett, 738 F.2d 994, 996-97 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 508 (1984); Stevens v. Lowder, 643 F.2d 1078, 1080 (5th Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Spyridon Kollias v. D & G Marine Maintenance, State Insurance Fund, and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor, B & a Marine Co. And State Insurance Fund v. Eleftherios Gouvatsos and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department of Labor
See Kollias v. Bay Tankers, 742 F.2d 1441 (2d Cir.) (mem.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 508 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Kollias v. D & G Marine Maintenance
See Kollias v. Bay Tankers, 742 F.2d 1441 (2d Cir.) (mem.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 508 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andrew J. Whelan v. Tyler Abell, Individually, and as a Member of the Law Firm of Bregman, Abell & Kay Animated Playhouses Corporation v. Tyler Abell, Individually and as a Member of the Law Firm of Bregman, Abell & Kay Andrew J. Whelan v. Tyler Abell, Individually, and as a Member of the Law Firm of Bregman, Abell & Kay
To be sure, courts have on occasion denied stockholders' suits alleging injury, asserting that the stockholders lacked "standing" to bring such an action because the stockholders, "experiencing no direct harm, possess[ ] no primary right to sue." Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 732 (3d Cir.1970) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); accord EMI Ltd. v. Bennett, 738 F.2d 994, 996-97 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 508 (1984); Stevens v. Lowder, 643 F.2d 1078, 1080 (5th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Whelan v. Abell
To be sure, courts have on occasion denied stockholders’ suits alleging injury, asserting that the stockholders lacked “standing” to bring such an action because the stockholders, “experiencing no direct harm, possess[ ] no primary right to sue.” Kauffman v. Dreyfus Fund, Inc., 434 F.2d 727, 732 (3d Cir.1970) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 974 , 91 S.Ct. 1190 , 28 L.Ed.2d 323 (1971); accord EMI Ltd. v. Bennett, 738 F.2d 994, 996-97 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 508 (1984); Stevens v. Lowder, 643 F.2d 1078, 1080 (5th Cir.1981).
cited
Cited "see"
C-ART, Ltd. v. Hong Kong Islands Line America
See generally EMI, Ltd. v. Bennett, 738 F.2d 994, 996 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 508 (1984); Pacific Coast Agric.
cited
Cited "see"
C-Art, Ltd. v. Hong Kong Islands Line America, S.A.
See generally EMI, Ltd. v. Bennett, 738 F.2d 994, 996 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1073 , 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 508 (1984); Pacific Coast Agric.
discussed
Cited "see"
Animal Lovers Volunteer Ass'n v. Weinberger
See EMI Ltd. v. Bennett, 738 F.2d 994, 996 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 508 (1984) (not in the environmental law context); Baker v. United States, 722 F.2d 517, 518 (9th Cir.1983) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Animal Lovers Volunteer Association, Inc. v. Weinberger
See EMI Ltd. v. Bennett, 738 F.2d 994, 996 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 508 (1984) (not in the environmental law context); Baker v. United States, 722 F.2d 517, 518 (9th Cir.1983) (same). 9 ALVA has expressed concern that if it is denied standing the effect will be to impose an actual-use test in a situation in which actual use is impossible, and to make the Navy immune from citizens' protests against illegal Navy activity on restricted Navy property.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Pickett v. Bowen
See also Williams v. Melton, 733 F.2d 1492, 1496 (11th Cir.1984), cert denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 567 , 83 L.Ed.2d 508 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Kollias
v.
Bay Tankers, Inc.
v.
Bay Tankers, Inc.
No. 84-582.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 3, 1984.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.