Houghton v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Co., 469 U.S. 829 (1984). · Go Syfert
Search
Houghton v. Prudential Prop. & Cas. Co., 469 U.S. 829 (1984). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
“if a side agreement does not meet the requirements of sec. 1823(e), fdic's knowledge of the terms of that side agreement does not render it valid against fdic or estop fdic from enforcing the agreement as contained in the failed bank's records”
107 citation events (3 in the last 25 years) across 43 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Milligan v. Gilmore Meyer Inc. (gasd, 1991-10-03)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
examined Cited as authority (quoted) Milligan v. Gilmore Meyer Inc.
S.D. Ga. · 1991 · quote attribution · 1 verbatim quote · confidence low
if a side agreement does not meet the requirements of sec. 1823(e), fdic's knowledge of the terms of that side agreement does not render it valid against fdic or estop fdic from enforcing the agreement as contained in the failed bank's records
cited Cited as authority (rule) Federal Deposit Insurance v. Eagle Properties, Ltd.
W.D. Tex. · 1985 · confidence medium
Id. at 162.
cited Cited "see" Kreines v. United States
N.D. Cal. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Lane v. United States, 727 F.2d 18, 21-22 (1st Cir.1984) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 829 , 105 S.Ct. 113 , 83 L.Ed.2d 57 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Texas American Bancshares, Inc. v. Robert Logan Clarke, the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
5th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See FDIC v. Merchants Nat’l Bank, 725 F.2d 634, 636-37 (11th Cir.), cert. denied 469 U.S. 829 , 105 S.Ct. 114 , 83 L.Ed.2d 57 (1984).
discussed Cited "see" Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Bracero & Rivera, Inc.
1st Cir. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
See Commerce Federal Savings Bank v. FDIC, 872 F.2d 1240, 1244-45 (6th Cir.1989) (“the statute ‘does not apply when ... the parties contend that no asset exists ... and that such invalidity is caused by acts independent of any understanding or side agreement.’ ”) (quoting FDIC v. Merchants National Bank of Mobile, 725 F.2d 634, 639 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 829 , 105 S.Ct. 114 , 83 L.Ed.2d 57 (1984)); Grubb v. FDIC, 868 F.2d 1151, 1158-59 (10th Cir.1989) (1823(e) is inapplicable where notes were voided before FDIC acquired them).
discussed Cited "see" Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, a United States Corporation, Plaintiff v. Bank of Boulder, a Colorado Corporation (2×)
10th Cir. · 1988 · signal: accord · confidence high
“Accounts are frozen, checks are returned unpaid, and a significant disruption of the intricate financial machinery results.” Gunter, 674 F.2d at 865 ; accord FDIC v. Merchants National Bank, 725 F.2d 634, 637 (11th Cir.) (lost jobs, checks returned unpaid, interruption of banking services in community, erosion in public confidence, adverse impact on affiliated or independent banks), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 829 , 105 S.Ct. 114 , 83 L.Ed.2d 57 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. P. Douglas Morrison Randy Tyree Tennesseans for Tyree George Dukas and Justine Dukas, Cross-Appellants
6th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See FDIC v. Merchants National Bank of Mobile, 725 F.2d 634 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 829 , 105 S.Ct. 114 , 83 L.Ed.2d 57 (1984).
cited Cited "see" Parker v. Watts
E.D. La. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See FDIC v. Merchants Nat’l Bank, 725 F.2d 634, 635 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 829 , 105 S.Ct. 114 , 83 L.Ed.2d 57 (1984) (cited by the FDIC).
cited Cited "see" Kile v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp.
E.D. Tenn. · 1986 · signal: see · confidence high
See, FDIC v. Merchants National Bank of Mobile, 725 F.2d 634 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 829 , 105 S.Ct. 114 , 83 L.Ed.2d 57 (1984).
cited Cited "see" United States v. Anthony J. Peters, Appeal of the Hearst Corporation. United States of America v. Anthony J. Peters, Appeal of Newspapers, Inc.
7th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see · confidence high
See In re Greensboro News Co., 727 F.2d 1320 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 105 S.Ct. 114 , 83 L.Ed.2d 57 (1984).
cited Cited "see, e.g." First State Bank of Wayne County, Kentucky (Formerly City and County Bank of Wayne County) v. The City and County Bank of Knox County, Tennessee
1st Cir. · 1989 · signal: see also · confidence low
See Investors Assocs., 775 F.2d at 156; see also FDIC v. Merchant’s Nat’l Bank, 725 F.2d 634 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 829 , 105 S.Ct. 114 , 83 L.Ed.2d 57 (1984).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity v. Richard M. Wood
6th Cir. · 1985 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also FDIC v. Merchants National Bank, 725 F.2d 634, 637-38 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 114 , 83 L.Ed.2d 57 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Houghton
v.
Prudential Property & Casualty Co.
No. 83-2002.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
469 U.S. 829
Published
1 passage pin-cited by 1 case
Pinpoint authority: bottom 60%
Citer courts: S.D. Georgia (1)

C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.