green
Positive treatment
10.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Dorothy Zosky v. Daniel Boyer and Boenning and Scattergood
(2×)
But see Goodwin v. Elkins & Co., 730 F.2d 99 , 101 n. 2 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 61 (1984) (relying on Gavlik in treating an order compelling arbitration arising out of a suit for damages as a final order); Par-Knit Milk v. Stockbridge Fabrics, 636 F.2d 51 (3d Cir.1980) (same). 7 .
discussed
Cited "but see"
Rivanna Trawlers Unlimited v. Thompson Trawlers, Inc.
(2×)
But see, Goodwin v. Elkins & Co., 730 F.2d 99, 103-04 (3d Cir.) (Opinion of Garth, J.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 61 (1984).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Rivanna Trawlers Unlimited v. Thompson Trawlers, Inc.
(2×)
But see, Goodwin v. Elkins & Co., 730 F.2d 99, 103-04 (3d Cir.) (Opinion of Garth, J.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 61 (1984).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Exeter Towers Associates v. Bowditch
(2×)
But see Owl Construction Co., Inc. v. Ronald Adams Contractor, Inc., 727 F.2d 540 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 61 (1984).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Chester County Intermediate Unit v. Pennsylvania Blue Shield
(2×)
Judge Garth explicitly did not reach the question, see id. at 103 n. 6, 104 n. 9, Chief Judge Seitz stated that such reliance was in fact inappropriate, but was harmless error in that case, see id. at 111-12 (Seitz, J., concurring), and Judge Becker would have held that it was proper for the district court to rely on the partnership agreement, as it was "actually and necessarily relied upon in the allegation of [the complaint], and its authenticity [was] conceded." Id. at 113-14 (Becker, J., concurring) Unlike the partnership agreement at issue in Goodwin, which was attached by the defendant t…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Chester County Intermediate Unit v. Pennsylvania Blue Shield
(2×)
Judge Garth explicitly did not reach the question, see id. at 103 n. 6, 104 n. 9, Chief Judge Seitz stated that such reliance was in fact inappropriate, but was harmless error in that case, see id. at 111-12 (Seitz, J., concurring), and Judge Becker would have held that it was proper for the district court to rely on the partnership agreement, as it was "actually and necessarily relied upon in the allegation of [the complaint], and its authenticity [was] conceded.” Id. at 113-14 (Becker, J., concurring).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. King
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 924 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brigido Marmolejo, Jr. And Mario Salinas
(2×)
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Rabito v. United States, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983) 19 Sedima, S.P.R.L. v. Imrex Co., 473 U.S. 479, 498 , 105 S.Ct. 3275, 3286 , 87 L.Ed.2d 346 (1985) 20 Salinas also argues that there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction for RICO conspiracy.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marmolejo
(2×)
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Rabito v. United States, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983). .
discussed
Cited "see"
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered Agent
(2×)
See Goodwin v. Elkins & Co., 730 F.2d 99 , 104 n. 9 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 61 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Volmar Distributors, Inc. v. New York Post Co., Inc.
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 918 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984) (although the language of § 1961(1)(A) allows for conspiracies to violate the provisions therein to serve as a predicate act for a RICO claim, that language is conspicuously omitted from § 1961(1)(B) & (Q); United States v. Weisman, 624 F.2d 1118, 1123-24 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 91 (1980) (to the same effect).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Federico Giovanelli, Steven Maltese, and Carmine Gualtiere
(2×)
See generally United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 925-28 (2d Cir.) (Newman, J., concurring in relevant part), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984). 47 In contrast, Gualtiere's convictions present a more difficult question.
cited
Cited "see"
Browning Avenue Realty Corp. v. Rosenshein
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. $148,215.00 in United States Currency
See United States v. $93,685.61, 730 F.2d 571, 572 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 119 , 83 L.Ed.2d 61 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. James Sutton Regan, Jack Z. Rabinowitz, Steven Barry Smotrich, Charles M. Zarzecki, Paul A. Berkman, and Bruce Lee Newberg
(2×)
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 922 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Todaro v. Orbit International Travel, Ltd.
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 923 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); Scotto, supra, 641 F.2d at 52 ; United States v. Huber, 603 F.2d 387, 393 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 445 U.S. 927 , 100 S.Ct. 1312 , 63 L.Ed.2d 759 (1980); see also Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. v. Malatesta, 1990 WL 96748 , 1990 U.S.Dist.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Alex Beverly, Betty McNulty George Brown and Diane Griffin
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921-22 (2d Cir.) (RICO conviction reversed where legally insufficient predicate act may have been necessary to verdict), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); Natelli, 527 F.2d at 325 (court relied on "the general principle" of Yates and found that general verdict was ambiguous and therefore reversible where one object in multi-object count was unsupported by the evidence; court did not identify that Yates related to legal insufficiency). 41 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gennaro J. Angiulo, Donato F. Angiulo, Samuel S. Granito, Francesco J. Angiulo and Michele A. Angiulo
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 923 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rafael L. Corona, Ray L. Corona
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921-23 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rastelli
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rastelli
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Finley
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2nd Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981), ce rt. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1249 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant/appellant v. $25,000 U.S. Currency, and Tomasino Gino Cirimele, Claimant/appellee
(2×)
See United States v. $93,685.61 in U.S. Currency, 730 F.2d 571, 572 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 119 , 83 L.Ed.2d 61 (1984). 33 REVERSED and REMANDED. 34 NELSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting. 35 I respectfully dissent.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Plaintiff-Counterdefendant/appellant v. $25,000 U.S. Currency, and Tomasino Gino Cirimele, Claimant/appellee
(2×)
See United States v. $93,685.61 in U.S. Currency, 730 F.2d 571, 572 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 119 , 83 L.Ed.2d 61 (1984). 29 REVERSED and REMANDED. 30 NELSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting. 31 I respectfully dissent.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re United States
See United States v. Spock, 416 F.2d [165,] 182 [ (1st Cir.1969) ]. 25 Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 927 (2d Cir.) (Newman, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part) (footnote and citations omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gruber v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.) (holding that RICO conspiracy requires showing “that defendant himself at least agreed to commit two or more predicate crimes”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ernesto J. Benevento, Ernest A. Benevento, Earl A. Keller, and Carmine Loiacono
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 918 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Weisman, 624 F.2d 1118, 1123-24 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 871 , 101 S.Ct. 209 , 66 L.Ed.2d 91 (1980); 18 U.S.C. § 1961 (1)(D).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Kragness
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983). .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Vastola
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 923 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Santoro, 647 F.Supp. 153, 177-78 (E.D.N.Y.1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Ingber v. Enzor
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 928 (2d Cir.) (Newman, J., concurring in relevant part and dissenting in part), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Neapolitan, United States of America v. Thomas Covello, Sr., Ralph Mascio, Jr., Joseph W. Hlavach, Antoine A. Turner, Victor R. Meadows, and Clement A. Messino
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Rabito v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Neapolitan
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Rabito v. United States, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Winter, 663 F.2d 1120, 1136 (1st Cir.1981), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1011 , 103 S.Ct. 1250 , 75 L.Ed.2d 479 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Clark J. Matthews II
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 922-23 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. ——, 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984); United States v. Margiotta, 646 F.2d 729, 733 (2d Cir.1981), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 913 , 103 S.Ct. 1891 , 77 L.Ed.2d 282 (1983); United States v. Quicksey, 525 F.2d 337, 340-41 (4th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 423 U.S. 1087 , 96 S.Ct. 878 , 47 L.Ed.2d 97 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Armen B. Condo
See United States v. $93,685.61 in United States Currency, 730 F.2d 571, 572 (9th Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 119 , 83 L.Ed.2d 61 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ferreri v. First Options of Chicago, Inc.
(2×)
See Goodwin v. Elkins & Co., 730 F.2d 99, 108-09 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, —U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 61 (1984); Stateside Machinery Co., Ltd. v. Alperin, 591 F.2d 234, 238-39 (3d Cir.1979); Gavlick Construction Co. v. H.F.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Banco Cafetero International
See United States v. $93,685.61 in U.S. Currency, 730 F.2d 571, 572 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 119 , 83 L.Ed.2d 61 (1984); United States v. Eighty Three Thousand Three Hundred Twenty Dollars ($83,320) in United States Currency and Forty Dollars ($40) in Canadian Currency, 682 F.2d 573, 577 (6th Cir.1982); United States v. Three Hundred Sixty Four Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty Dollars ($364,960.00) in United States Currency, 661 F.2d 319, 325 (5th Cir.1981). *1404 The probable cause which the government must show is: “a reasonable ground for belief of guilt, supported by le…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Benjamin Ruggiero and John Cerasani
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Benzion Golomb
See United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 925 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marchese
Moreover, “[t]o establish denial of due process based on excessive pre-indictment delay [a defendant] bears the heavy burden ... of showing not only that he was prejudiced by the delay but that it was so unfair as to violate fundamental concepts of fair play and decency, such as would occur if the prosecutor deliberately used the delay to achieve a substantial tactical advantage.” Id. (citing United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783 , 97 S.Ct. 2044 , 52 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977)); see also United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 925 (2d Cir.) (defendant “failed to show either actual prejudice or…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Alfano v. BDO Seidman, LLP
(2×)
The FAA is implicated when [a] written provision in . . . a contract evidencing a transaction involving commerce to settle by arbitration a controversy thereafter arising out of such contract or transaction . . . shall be valid, irrevocable, and enforceable, save upon such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract. [ 9 U.S.C.A. § 2 .] For the FAA to apply here, we must first find that the contract containing the arbitration provision "evidences a transaction involving commerce." Ibid.; see also Goodwin v. Elkins & Co., 730 F. 2d 99, 108-09 (3d Cir.), cert. denied…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gigante
See, e.g., United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 923 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jim Burke Automotive, Inc. v. Beavers
(2×)
See also Goodwin v. Elkins & Co., 730 F.2d 99 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 61 (1984); Nederlandse Erts-Tankersmaatschappij, N.V. v. Isbrandtsen Co., 339 F.2d 440, 442 (2d Cir.1964); Liberty University, Inc. v. Kemper Securities Group, Inc., 758 F.Supp. 1148 (W.D.Va.1991); Pioneer Supply Co. v. American Meter Co., 484 F.Supp. 227, 229 (W.D.Okla.1979); Penalver v. Compagnie De Navigation Frutiere, Matouba, 428 F.Supp. 1070, 1072 (E.D.N.Y.1977). [1] Jim Burke's motion to compel arbitration fails even to allege that the transaction involves interstate comm…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Ball
See, e.g., United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F. 2d 913, 923 (2d Cir.), cert. denied sub nom., Rabito v. United States, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed. 2d 60 (1984); United States v. Martino, 648 F. 2d 367 , 381 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied sub nom., Russello v. United States, 456 U.S. 943 , 102 S.Ct. 2006 , 72 L.Ed. 2d 465 (1982); United States v. Boffa, 513 F. Supp. 444, 460-61 (D.C.Del. 1980) (collecting federal decisions addressing this issue).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Manuel Antonio Ogando, Anastasio Pineda Ogando, Also Known as Anibal, Also Known as Matuti and Bienvenido Castillo
These complexities have prompted us to conclude that, notwithstanding the law’s “traditional distaste for special interrogatories,” United States v. Coonan, 839 F.2d 886, 891 (2d Cir.1988), “where the offense charged required proof of a specific number of predicate facts and the nature of the proof at trial warrants it, the trial court *149 would be well advised to submit to the jury interrogatories that would allow an assessment of whether the jury’s determination of guilt rested on permissible bases.” United States v. Roman, 870 F.2d 65, 73 (2d Cir.) (CCE case), cert. denied, 490…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Mutual Benefit Life Insurance v. Zimmerman
(2×)
See e.g., Goodwin v. Elkins & Co., 730 F.2d 99, 109-110 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 61 (1984) (“Any controversy arising hereunder” is broad in sweep and covers disputes arising during life and demise of agreement.); Armada Coal Export, Inc. v. Interbulk, Ltd., 726 F.2d 1566, 1568 (11th Cir.1984) (“Any dispute arising during the execution of the Charter Party” is broad arbitration clause.); Republic of Philippines v. Westinghouse Elec.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Warren B. Sheinkopf v. John K.P. Stone Iii, Etc.
(2×)
Compare, e.g., Williamson v. Tucker, 645 F.2d 404, 424-25 (5th Cir.) (holding that joint venture interest was a security where circumstances showed that investor lacked the ability "to exercise meaningful partnership powers”), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 897 , 102 S.Ct. 396 , 70 L.Ed.2d 212 (1981), with, e.g., Goodwin v. Elkins & Co., 730 F.2d 99, 103-08 (3d Cir.) (adopting bright-line rule that no general partnership formed pursuant to the Uniform Partnership Act is a security), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 61 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Scarpa
Moreover, "[t]o establish denial of due process based on excessive pre-indictment delay [a defendant] bears the heavy burden ... of showing not only that he was prejudiced by the delay but that it was so unfair as to violate fundamental concepts of fair play and decency, such as would occur if the prosecutor deliberately used the delay to achieve a substantial tactical advantage." Id. (citing United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783 , 97 S.Ct. 2044 , 52 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977)); see also United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 925 (2d Cir.) (defendant "failed to show either actual prejudice or unjus…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Scarpa
Moreover, “[t]o establish denial of due process based on excessive pre-indictment delay [a defendant] bears the heavy burden ... of showing not only that he was prejudiced by the delay but that it was so unfair as to violate fundamental concepts of fair play and decency, such as would occur if the prosecutor deliberately used the delay to achieve a substantial tactical advantage.” Id. (citing United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783 , 97 S.Ct. 2044 , 52 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977)); see also United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 925 (2d Cir.) (defendant “failed to show either actual prejudice or…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robert Garcia and Jane Lee Garcia
United States v. Natelli, 527 F.2d 311, 325 (2d Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 934 , 96 S.Ct. 1663 , 48 L.Ed.2d 175 (1976); see also United States v. Ruggiero, 726 F.2d 913, 921 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 60 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,216 Dallas Banghart and Michael G. Banghart v. Hollywood General Partnership Ed Wray Robert Rosen, M.D. And Barry Maron, M.D.
(2×)
See, e.g., Goodwin v. Elkins & Co., 730 F.2d 99, 102-03 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 831 , 105 S.Ct. 118 , 83 L.Ed.2d 61 (1984); Odom v. Slavik, 703 F.2d 212, 215 (6th Cir.1983); see also Gordon v. Terry, 684 F.2d 736, 741 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1203 , 103 S.Ct. 1188 , 75 L.Ed.2d 434 (1983).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Goodwin
v.
Elkins & Co.
v.
Elkins & Co.
No. 83-2038.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.