green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.6 score
“we decline to follow durrett's 70 fair market value rule for the reason that a regularly conducted sale, open to all bidders and all creditors, is itself a safeguard against the evils of private transfers to relatives and favorites”
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc. v. Spitters (In Re Pajaro Dunes Rental Agency, Inc.)
madrid ii
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Barrett v. Commonwealth Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
we decline to follow durrett's 70 fair market value rule for the reason that a regularly conducted sale, open to all bidders and all creditors, is itself a safeguard against the evils of private transfers to relatives and favorites
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Waste Water, Inc. v. Alpha Finishing & Developing Corp.
In fact, the Court expressly stated, “We first note that this is not a case where the party’s counsel volun *943 tarily withdrew, nor one where a party, because of an emergency, was left without legal representation.” Id. at 94 (emphasis added).
cited
Cited "see"
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Monroe
See State v. Crank, 666 S.W.2d 91, 94 (Tex.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 124 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984); Guerrero-Ramirez v. Texas State Bd. of Med.
cited
Cited "see"
Gantz v. Colonial Central Savings Bank, F.S.B. (In Re Gantz)
See In re Madrid, 21 B.R. 424, 426 (9th Cir. BAP 1982), aff'd on other grounds, 725 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct 125 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
The Estate Construction Company v. Miller & Smith Holding Company, Incorporated
See In re Madrid, 21 B.R. 424 (9th Cir.1982), aff'd, 725 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 125 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984); Durrett v. Washington Nat'l Ins.
cited
Cited "see"
Estate Construction Co. v. Miller & Smith Holding Co.
See In re Madrid, 21 B.R. 424 (9th Cir.1982), aff'd, 725 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 125 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984); Durrett v. Washington Nat’l Ins.
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles v. Zamora
Tex. R.Civ.P. 166a(f); See State v. Crank, 666 S.W.2d 91, 94 (Tex.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 124 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984); Hernandez v. Heldenfels, 374 S.W.2d 196, 202 (Tex.1963); Schero v. Astra Bar, Inc., 596 S.W.2d 613, 615 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1980, no writ).
cited
Cited "see"
Walter N. Yoder & Sons, Inc. v. Sheet Metal Workers' Local Union No. 100
See Local 59, IBEW v. Green Corp., 725 F.2d 264, 266-67 (5th Cir.) (district court remanded to arbitration panel for clarification), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 124 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Ristich
See Madrid v. Lawyers Title 725 F.2d 1197, 1201 (9th Cir., 1984), cert. den. — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct 125 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Kjeldahl v. United States (In Re Kjeldahl)
See, In re Madrid, 725 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir.) cert. *923 denied — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 125 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984); In re Reinboldt, 39 B.R. 677 (Bankr.Minn.1983) aff'd sub nom, In re William 39 B.R. 678 (D.Minn.1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Silver Bros. Co., Inc.
See also In re Madrid, 21 B.R. 424 (BAP 9th Cir.1982), aff'd 725 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 125 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984); In re Rancourt, 153 B.R. 380 (Bankr.D.N.H.1993); In re Stadium Management Corp., 895 F.2d 845 , 847 (1st Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Beck v. General Accident Insurance (In Re Hughes & Associates Insurance Agency, Inc.)
See, e.g., In re Madrid, 725 F.2d 1197, 1204 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 125 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984) (Farris, J., concurring); In re Bundles, 61 B.R. 929, 934 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Ind.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wheless Drilling, New Park Drilling Fluids, Inc. v. Bennett
See, e.g., Madrid v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp. (In re Madrid), 725 F.2d 1197, 1202 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 125 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984); Abramson v. Lakewood Bank & Trust Co., 647 F.2d 547, 549 (5th Cir.1981) (Clark, J., dissenting); Alden, Gross & Borowitz, Real Property Foreclosure as a Fraudulent Conveyance: Proposals For Solving the Problem, 38 Bus.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Emerald Oil Co.
See, e.g., Madrid v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corp. (In re Madrid), 725 F.2d 1197, 1202 (9th Cir.) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 833 , 105 S.Ct. 125 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984); Abramson v. Lakewood Bank & Trust Co., 647 F.2d 547, 549 (5th Cir.1981) (Clark, J., dissenting); Alden, Gross & Borowitz, Real Property Foreclosure as a Fraudulent Conveyance: Proposals For Solving the Problem, 38 Bus.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Silent Hoist & Crane Co. v. Director, Division of Taxation
See also Commissioner of Revenue v. Associated Dry Goods, Inc., 347 N.W.2d 36 (Minn.1984), cert, den., — US. -, 105 S.Ct. 124 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984) (separate divisions formed a unitary business where corporation had a single board of directors and a single set of officers and shareholders, administrative services were centralized, and there was a commingling of funds); ARMCO, Inc. v. Hardesty, 303 S.E.2d 706 (W.Va.1983), rev’d on other grounds, 467 US. 638, 104 S.Ct. 2620 , 81 L.Ed.2d 540 (1984) (activities of steel group, wire rope group, and metal products division are parts of “unita…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Safeway Stores, Inc. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union
Morgan Services, Inc. v. Local 323, Chicago and Central States Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing and Textile Workers Union, 724 F.2d at 1222 n. 8; see also Local Union 59, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Green Corporation, 725 F.2d 264, 268 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 124 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984) (interpretation derived from wording or purpose of contract in some logical way).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Smith
Compare Durrett v. Washington National Insurance Co., 621 F.2d 201 (5th Cir.1980), with In re Madrid, 725 F.2d 1197 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 125 , 83 L.Ed.2d 66 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Landmark Beef Processors, Inc.
v.
Block, Secretary of Agriculture
v.
Block, Secretary of Agriculture
No. 83-2095.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Published
Citer courts: N.D. California (1) · E.D. Pennsylvania (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.