green
Positive treatment
5.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1984 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1984
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
AK Steel Corp. v. Sollac & Ugine
See Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 959 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 835 , 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Graeme I. Bell, Leslie B. Rall and James P. Merryweather
See Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 960-61 , 220 USPQ 592, 599-600 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 835 , 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Smith
See Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 957 , 220 USPQ 592, 597 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 835 , 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Ortho Pharmaceutical Corporation v. Herchel Smith and American Home Products Corporation, Defendants/cross-Appellants. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories v. Johnson & Johnson Corporation
See Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 957 , 220 USPQ 592, 597 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 835 , 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Peter Gabor Kalman v. The Berlyn Corporation, Defendant/cross-Appellant
See Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 961 , 220 USPQ 592, 600 (Fed.Cir.1988), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 835 , 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 , 225 USPQ 232 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Steel Corporation v. Phillips Petroleum Company
See Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 959 , 220 USPQ 592, 598 (Fed.Cir.1983) ("correct finding of infringement of otherwise valid claims mandates as a matter of law a finding of utility under Sec. 101"), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 835 , 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 (1984). 33 We affirm the court's conclusion that defendants had not proven the 1953 specification's description of utility defective under section 112.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Steel Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
See Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 959 , 220 USPQ 592, 598 (Fed.Cir.1983) (“correct finding of infringement of otherwise valid claims mandates as a matter of law a finding of utility under § 101”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 835 , 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Philip Morris, Inc. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.
See Raytheon v. Roper, 724 F.2d 951, 956 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 835 , 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
State of Louisiana v. Testbank
See Hercules Carriers, Inc. v. Florida, 720 F.2d 1201 (11th Cir.1983), aff'd by an equally divided court, 728 F.2d 1359 (11th Cir.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 128 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 6 We note that both the Ninth and Eleventh Circuits have permitted crewmembers of a fishing boat to recover for their share of the lost catch when the vessel was negligently damaged.
discussed
Cited "see"
Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. M/V Testbank
See Hercules Carriers, Inc. v. Florida, 720 F.2d 1201 (11th Cir.1983), aff'd by an equally divided court, 728 F.2d 1359 (11th Cir.1984) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 128 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 . .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Magnivision, Inc. v. Bonneau Co.
See, e.g., Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 957 (Fed.Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 835 , 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 (1984); Cole v. Kimberly-Clark Corp., 102 F.3d 524, 530-31 (Fed.Cir.1996.) In this case, this Court finds that the “cantilever support engaging” language of Claims 1 and 3 is a means-plus-function limitation because it recites a function to be performed rather than definite structure or materials for performing that function.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shelley K. Cole v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation
(2×)
See, e.g., Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 957 , 220 USPQ 592, 597 (Fed.Cir.1983) (construing functional language introduced. by “so that” to be equivalent to “means for” claim language), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 835 , 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 (1984); 1162 O.G. 59 , 59 (17 May 1994) (examination guidelines stating that the term “means” is not required to invoke § 112, ¶ 6).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Katz v. AIWA America, Inc.
Corp. of America, 775 F.2d 1107, 1121 (Fed.Cir.1985); see also Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 957 (Fed.Cir.1983) (“That claims are interpreted in light of the specification does not mean that everything expressed in the specification must be read into all the claims.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 835 , 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 (1984). 8 This analysis applies all the more to remarks made by the patentee during prosecution of the patent which are not at all embodied in the patent. 2.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gordon Gould v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks
See, e.g., Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951 , 960 n. 6, 220 U.S.P.Q. 592 , 599 n. 6 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 835 , 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen Archery, Inc. v. Browning Manufacturing Co.
Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 , 86 S.Ct. 684, 693-694 , 15 L.Ed.2d 545 , 148 U.S.P.Q. 459, 467 (1966); see, e.g., Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 961 , 220 U.S.P.Q. 592, 600 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 835 , 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 , 225 U.S.P.Q. 232 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Allen Archery, Inc. v. Browning Manufacturing Co.
Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 17-18 , 86 S.Ct. 684, 693-694 , 15 L.Ed.2d 545 , 148 U.S.P.Q. 459, 467 (1966); see, e.g., Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 961 , 220 U.S.P.Q. 592, 600 (Fed.Cir.1983), cer t. denied, 469 U.S. 835 , 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 , 225 U.S.P.Q. 232 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Medtronic, Inc. And Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Daig Corporation
See, e.g., Ray-theon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 956 , 220 USPQ 592, 596 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Interconnect Planning Corporation v. Thomas E. Feil, Robert O. Carpenter, v Band Systems, Inc., and Turret Equipment Corp.
See, e.g., Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 956 , 220 USPQ 592, 596 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 , 225 USPQ 232 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Atlas Powder Company v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Company and Alamo Explosives Company, Inc.
See, e.g., Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 956 , 220 USPQ 592, 596 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
J.P. Stevens & Co., Inc. v. Lex Tex Ltd., Inc.
See, e.g., Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 956 , 220 USPQ 592, 596 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 (1984).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
J.P. Stevens & Co. v. Lex Tex Ltd.
See, e.g., Raytheon Co. v. Roper Corp., 724 F.2d 951, 956 , 220 USPQ 592, 596 (Fed.Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 127 , 83 L.Ed.2d 69 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Aviles-Perez
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 83-2127.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 1, 1984.
Published
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.