green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
13.3 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1990 ·
…does not insulate western from liability for violating california statutes prohibiting false advertising
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State of Kan. Ex Rel. Stephan v. TWA
does not insulate western from liability for violating california statutes prohibiting false advertising
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Kansas ex rel. Stephan v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
does not insulate western from liability for violating california statutes prohibiting false advertising
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Connolly v. State
julius's reliance solely upon the defense of alibi resulted in his failure to produce any evidence warranting a charge on the lesser included offense of manslaughter in the first degree.
discussed
Cited "see"
Nebraska v. Central Interstate Low-Level Radioactive Waste Commission
(2×)
See Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. Arizona, 738 F.2d 1021, 1026-32 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 815 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Burris v. Farley
See Burris v. State, 465 N.E.2d 171 (Ind.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 816 , 83 L.Ed.2d 809 (1985) (“Burns I ”).
discussed
Cited "see"
Miller v. State
(2×)
See Burris v. State (1984), Ind., 465 N.E.2d 171 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 816 , 83 L.Ed.2d 809 .
examined
Cited "see"
Bank v. Pitt
(3×)
See Lipton v. Documation, Inc., 734 F.2d 740 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 814 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 (1985). .
examined
Cited "see"
Bank v. Pitt
(3×)
See Lipton v. Documation, Inc., 734 F.2d 740 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 814 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 (1985) 4 Dussouy is a Former Fifth Circuit case decided in November 1981.
cited
Cited "see"
Hunt v. State
See Spivey v. State, 253 Ga. 187 , 319 S.E.2d 420, 430 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 816 , 83 L.Ed.2d 809 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Union of Concerned Scientists v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission
See Union of Concerned Scientists v. NRC, 735 F.2d 1437 , 1444-45 n. 12 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 815 , 83 L.Ed.2d 808 (1985); see generally United States v. Florida East Coast Ry.
discussed
Cited "see"
Union Of Concerned Scientists v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
See Union of Concerned Scientists v. NRC, 735 F.2d 1437 , 1444-45 n. 12 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 815 , 83 L.Ed.2d 808 (1985); see generally United States v. Florida East Coast Ry.
discussed
Cited "see"
Minnick v. State
(2×)
See Burris v. State (1984), Ind., 465 N.E.2d 171 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 816 , 83 L.Ed.2d 809 .
examined
Cited "see"
Ross v. Bank South, N.A.
(9×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Lipton v. Documation, 734 F.2d 740, 742 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 814 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 (1985).
examined
Cited "see"
Ernest Ross, Individually and as Representative of a Bondholder Class v. Bank South, N.A., Alston & Bird, George Miller, Individually and as a Representative of a Class of Bondholders Described in the Complaint v. Arthur M. Rice, Jr., William v. Weldon, William v. Weldon, Ernest Ross, Individually and as Representative of a Bondholder Class v. Bank South, N.A., Alston & Bird, George Miller, Individually and as Representative of a Bondholder Class v. Arthur M. Rice, Jr.
(9×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Lipton v. Documation, 734 F.2d 740, 742 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 814 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 (1985).
examined
Cited "see"
Landry v. Price Waterhouse Chartered Accountants
(3×)
See Lipton v. Documation, 734 F.2d 740 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 814 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 (1985); Wilson v. Comtech Telecommunications Corp., 648 F.2d 88, 92 (2d Cir.1981); Greenspan, 78 F.R.D. at 132-33 .
cited
Cited "see"
Lopez v. State
See Burris v. State (1984), Ind., 465 N.E.2d 171 , cert. denied (1985), 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 816 , 83 L.Ed.2d 809 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Basic Inc. v. Levinson
(2×)
See Lipton v. Domination, Inc., 734 F. 2d 740, 748 (CA11 1984), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 1132 (1985). 23 The presumption is also supported by common sense and probability.
examined
Cited "see"
Ross v. Bank South, N.A.
(3×)
See Lipton v. Documation, Inc., 734 F.2d 740, 742 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 814 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 (1985); Dupuy, 551 F.2d at 1016 .
examined
Cited "see"
Ernest Ross, Individually and as Representative of a Bondholder Class v. Bank South, N.A., Alston & Bird, George Miller, Individually and as a Representative of a Class of Bondholders Described in the Complaint v. Arthur M. Rice, Jr., William v. Weldon, Ernest Ross, Individually and as Representative of a Bondholder Class v. Bank South, N.A., George Miller, Individually, and as a Representative of a Class of Bondholders Described in the Complaint v. Arthur M. Rice, Jr.
(3×)
See Lipton v. Documation, Inc., 734 F.2d 740, 742 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 814 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 (1985); Dupuy, 551 F.2d at 1016 . 22 When the defendant has a duty to disclose, and the disclosure omits a material fact, plaintiff's reliance on the omission is presumed.
cited
Cited "see"
Smith v. State
See Burris v. State (1984), Ind., 465 N.E.2d 171 , cert. denied 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 816 , 83 L.Ed.2d 809 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Church of Scientology of California v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
(2×)
See Standard Oil Co. of California v. Arizona, 738 F.2d 1021, 1023 (9th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 815 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 (1985); McConney, 728 F.2d at 1203 .
examined
Cited "see"
Sheftelman v. Jones
(6×)
See Lipton v. Documation, Inc., 734 F.2d 740, 742 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 814 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 (1985); Huddleston v. Herman & MacLean, 640 F.2d 534, 543 (5th Cir.1981), aff'd in part and rev’d in part on other grounds, 459 U.S. 357 , 103 S.Ct. 683 , 74 L.Ed.2d. 548 (1983).
examined
Cited "see"
Nelsen v. Craig-Hallum, Inc.
(3×)
See, Lipton v. Documation, Inc., 734 F.2d 740 (11th Cir.1984) (adopting fraud on the market theory of recovery), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 [ 105 S.Ct. 814 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 ] (1985).
examined
Cited "see"
Gilbert Roeder, Etc. v. Alpha Industries, Inc.
(3×)
See Lipton v. Documation, Inc., 734 F.2d 740, 743 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 814 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Levinson v. Basic Inc.
(2×)
See Lipton v. Documation, Inc., 734 F.2d 740 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 814 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 (1985); T.J.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,535 Harold Harris v. Union Electric Company
(2×)
See Lipton v. Documation, Inc., 734 F.2d 740, 748 (11th Cir. 1984) (adopting a fraud on the market theory of recovery), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 814 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 (1985). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Levinson v. Basic Inc.
(2×)
See Lipton v. Documation, Inc., 734 F.2d 740 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 814 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 (1985); T.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Olympia Brewing Company Securities Litigation
(2×)
See cases cited in Lipton v. Documation, Inc., 734 F.2d 740, 743 (11th Cir.), petition for cert. denied 10/22/84, — U.S. ---, 105 S.Ct. 814 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
(2×)
Similarly, Pan Am remains free to route a plane from Ithaca to Istanbul with as many stops in between as it chooses, but it cannot market that flight to New York consumers as a `direct' flight." New York v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 728 F. Supp. 162, 176 (SDNY 1989); see also People v. Western Airlines, Inc., 155 Cal. App. 3d 597, 600 , 202 Cal. Rptr. 237, 238 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U. S. 1132 (1985); Note, To Form a More Perfect Union?: Federalism and Informal Interstate Cooperation, 102 Harv.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Johnson v. State
See also Ex parte Julius , 455 So.2d 984 (Ala. 1984), cert. denied , 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 817 , 83 L.Ed.2d 809 (1985); Mullis v. State , 545 So.2d 205 (Ala.Crim.App. 1989).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
In re Amerifirst Securities Litigation
(3×)
See also Lipton v. Documation, Inc., 734 F.2d 740, 747-48 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 814 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 (1985). 4 In order for the market theory to apply, however, it follows that a plaintiff must show that the market in which the stock traded was “efficient.” Freeman v. Laventhol & Horwath, 915 F.2d 193, 197-98 (6th Cir.1990); Greenberg v. Boettcher & Co., 755 F.Supp. 776, 781 (N.D.Ill.1991); Cammer v. Bloom, 711 F.Supp. 1264 , 1285 & n. 34 (D.N.J.1989).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Morris v. International Yogurt Co.
See, e.g., Lipton v. Documation, Inc., 734 F.2d 740, 742 (11th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 (1985); Rifkin v. Crow, 574 F.2d 256, 262 (5th Cir. 1978).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Nelson v. State
See also Julius v. State , 455 So.2d 975 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983), aff'd, 455 So.2d 984 (Ala. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 817 , 83 L.Ed.2d 809 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hubbard v. State
See also, Julius v. State , 455 So.2d 975 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983), aff'd, 455 So.2d 984 (Ala. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 817 , 83 L.Ed.2d 809 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shapiro v. Merrill Lynch & Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Lipton v. Documation, Inc., 734 F.2d 740 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, sub nom., Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Lipton, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 814 , 83 L.Ed.2d 807 (1985); T.J.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wright v. State
See also Ex parte Julius , 455 So.2d 984 , 987 (Ala. 1984) (violent and brutal sexual abuse and strangulation of victim), cert. denied, Julius v. Alabama , 469 U.S. 1132 , 105 S.Ct. 817 , 83 L.Ed.2d 809 (1985); Ex parte Tomlin , 443 So.2d 59 , 63 (Ala. 1983) (killing planned for over nine months, involved travel with a "hit man" from Texas to Mobile for express purpose of killing one of victims, and involved the killing with a shotgun and pistol of intended victim and his fifteen-year-old companion), cert. denied, Tomlin v. Alabama , 466 U.S. 954 , 104 S.Ct. 2160 , 80 L.Ed.2d 545 (1984).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co.
v.
Lipton and Documation, Inc. v. Lipton
v.
Lipton and Documation, Inc. v. Lipton
No. 84-646; No. 84-651.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 7, 1985.
Cited by 45 opinions | Published
Citer courts: D. Kansas (2) · Court of Criminal Appeals of A… (1)
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Justice Brennan would grant certiorari. Reported below: 734 F. 2d 740.