green
Positive treatment
8.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Campbell v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But see Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 552 F.Supp. 820, 821 (N.D.Cal.1982) (awarding without discussion interest at the T-bill rate on a judgment entered before October 1, 1982 on interest accruing on or after October 1, 1982), aff'd on other grounds, 743 F.2d 1282 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); cf R.W.T. v. Dalton, 712 F.2d 1225 , 1235 (8th Cir.), (awarding interest at the T-bill rate on a judgment entered before October 1, 1982 from the date of entry of the judgment) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1009 , 104 S.Ct. 527 , 78 L.Ed.2d 710 (1983).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Campbell v. United States
(2×)
also: Cited "see"
But see Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 552 F.Supp. 820, 821 (N.D.Cal.1982) (awarding without discussion interest at the T-bill rate on a judgment entered before October 1, 1982 on interest accruing on or after October 1, 1982), aff'd on other grounds, 743 F.2d 1282 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); cf. R.W.T. v. Dalton, 712 F.2d 1225 , 1235 (8th Cir.), (awarding interest at the T-bill rate on a judgment entered before October 1, 1982 from the date of entry of the judgment) cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1009 , 104 S.Ct. 527 , 78 L.Ed.2d 710 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. IBAN C.
(2×)
See State v. George, 194 Conn. 361, 373 , 481 A.2d 1068 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Swinton
See State v. George, 194 Conn. 361, 366 , 481 A.2d 1068 (1984) (trial court’s “isolated ruling does not in the context of the whole case amount to a deprivation of the opportunity to reveal the facts from which the jury could appropriately draw inferences relating to the reliability of the witness” [internal quotation marks omitted]), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Hauge
(2×)
See Handguards, [ Handgards ] Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282, 1289 (9th Cir.1984) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hannon
See State v. Jacobs, 194 Conn. 119, 125-26 , 479 A.2d 226 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Aga v. Hundahl
See Handguards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282, 1289 (9th Cir.1984) (citations omitted), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Grayson v. Wofsey, Rosen, Kweskin & Kuriansky
“The general standard for admissibility of expert testimony in Connecticut is simply that the expert must demonstrate a ‘special skill or knowledge, beyond the ken of the average juror, that, as properly applied, would be helpful to the determination of an ultimate issue.’ Siladi v. McNamara, 164 Conn. 510, 513 , 325 A.2d 277 (1973); see State v. George, 194 Conn. 361, 373 , 481 A.2d 1068 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Buehler AG v. Ocrim S.P.A. Ocrim America, Inc.
See Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d-1282, 1293 (9th Cir.1984) [“Handgards II”], cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); Wahl v. Rexnord, Inc., 481 F.Supp. 573, 588-89 (D.N.J.1979), rev’d on other grounds, 624 F.2d 1169 (3rd Cir. 1980); Prelin Indus., Inc. v. G & G Crafts, Inc., 357 F.Supp. 52, 70 (W.D.Okla.1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ryan v. Dow Chemical Co.
See Fox v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 739 F.2d 929, 932 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 962 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); Pearson v. Ecological Science Corp., 522 F.2d 171 (5th Cir.1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 912 , 96 S.Ct. 1508 , 47 L.Ed.2d 762 (1976).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Headley
Id., 702 ; see State v. George, 194 Conn. 361, 373 , 481 A.2d 1068 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Davis v. Margolis
Fitzmaurice v. Flynn, 167 Conn. 609, 617 , 356 A.2d 887 (1975); Decho v. Shutkin, 144 Conn. 102, 106 , 127 A.2d 618 (1956); Bent v. Green, supra. The general standard for admissibility of expert testimony in Connecticut is simply that the expert must demonstrate “a special skill or knowledge, beyond the ken of the average juror, that, as properly applied, would be helpful to the determination of an ultimate issue.” Siladi v. McNamara, 164 Conn. 510, 513 , 325 A.2d 277 (1973); see State v. George, 194 Conn. 361, 373 , 481 A.2d 1068 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L…
discussed
Cited "see"
Langella v. Anderson
Id. at 2154 ; see Fox v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 739 F.2d 929, 933 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 962 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); Hobbs & Co. v. American Investors Management, 576 F.2d 29, 34 (3d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
O & G/O'Connell Joint Venture v. Chase Family Ltd. Partnership No. 3
See State v. George, 194 Conn. 361, 372 , 481 A.2d 1068 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Eileen Bailey v. Grand Trunk Lines New England, Canadian National Railway, Midline Division, St. Lawrence Region
Imm v. Union R.R., 289 F.2d 858 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 833 , 82 S.Ct. 55 , 7 L.Ed.2d 35 (1961); see Fox v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 739 F.2d 929, 932-33 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 962 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); Finnerty v. Cowen, 508 F.2d 979, 983-84 (2d Cir.1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Beehler v. Jeffes
See Fox v. Consolidated Rail Corp., 739 F.2d 929 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 962 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Vance v. American Hawaii Cruises, Inc.
See Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282 , 1300 n. 28 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vance v. American Hawaii Cruises
See Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282 , 1300 n. 28 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985). 34 Nevertheless, we have recognized that even where a claim is based on an unliquidated sum, courts have permitted in proper cases the recovery of prejudgment interest as a method of making a plaintiff whole.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bell v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.
(2×)
See Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); Twin City Sportservice, Inc. v. Charles O.
cited
Cited "see"
Vinod C. Bhan, C.R.N.A. v. Nme Hospitals, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Dba Manteca Hospital
See Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282, 1295 (9th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); Ostrofe v. H.S.
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,280, 13 Collier bankr.cas.2d 1198, Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,718 Herbert D. Underhill v. Carlos Royal, Herbert D. Underhill v. National Mortgage Exchange, Inc.
See Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282, 1288 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Underhill v. Royal
See Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282, 1288 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Telemeter, Corporation v. Hamlin International Corporation and Philip D. Hamlin
See Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282, 1298 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985). 1 State law governs the interest rate on a judgment in a diversity case entered before October 1, 1982. 28 U.S.C. § 1961 (1976); Turner v. Japan Lines, Ltd., 702 F.2d 752, 757 (9th cir.1983); Michael-Regan Co. v. Lindell, 527 F.2d 653 , 659 (9th Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Gibson
The common law of this state has, to that end, ‘‘consistently recognized the right of an accused, during cross-examination, to place before the jury the fact that criminal charges are pending against the state’s wit- nesses.’’ State v. Ortiz, 198 Conn. 220, 223 , 502 A.2d 400 (1985); see State v. Benedict, 313 Conn. 494 , 510, 98 A.3d 42 (2014) (‘‘[i]t is well settled law that [t]he fact that the witness is a defendant in a criminal prosecution . . . cre- ates an interest which affects his [or her] credibility’’ (inter- nal quotation marks omitted)); see also State v. George,…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Lapointe v. Commissioner of Correction
See, e.g., State v. George, 194 Conn. 361, 373 , 481 A.2d 1068 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Joseph
See, e.g., State v. Rudd, supra, 706-707 ; see also State v. Jacobs, 194 Conn. 119, 128 , 479 A.2d 226 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Streater
“Our cases have consistently recognized the right of an accused, during cross-examination, to place before the jury the fact that criminal charges are pending against the state’s witnesses.” State v. Ortiz, 198 Conn. 220, 223 , 502 A.2d 400 (1985); State v. Lubesky, supra, 482 ; see also State v. George, 194 Conn. 361, 365 , 481 A.2d 1068 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1191 , 105 S. Ct. 963 , 83 L.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Buehler AG v. Ocrim, S.P.A.
See, e.g., Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282, 1293 (9th Cir.1984), cert, denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); Wahl v. Rexnord, Inc., 481 F.Supp. 573, 588-589 (D.N.J.1979), reversed on other grounds, 624 F.2d 1169 (3rd Cir.1980); Prelin Industries, Inc. v. G &G Crafts, Inc., 357 F.Supp. 52, 70 (W.D.Okla.1972).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bonjorno, Joseph A., Kerr, George M., and Clisby, Barbara K., as Transferees in Liquidation and Dissolution of Columbia Metal Culvert Co., Inc., No. 88-1318 v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation and Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc. Bonjorno, Joseph A., Kerr, George M., and Clisby, Barbara K., as Transferees in Liquidation and Dissolution of Columbia Metal Culvert Co., Inc. v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation and Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc., No. 88-1396
See, e.g., Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282, 1300 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
John G. Marshall v. Jose E. Perez-Arzuaga, Appeal of Avis Rent-A-Car of Puerto Rico, Inc.
See, e.g., Hangards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 552 F.Supp. 820 (N.D.Cal.1982), aff'd, 743 F.2d 1282 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985); Louisiana & Arkansas Ry.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bonjorno v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp.
See, e.g., Handgards, Inc. v. Ethicon, Inc., 743 F.2d 1282, 1300 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1190 , 105 S.Ct. 963 , 83 L.Ed.2d 968 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Jacobs
v.
Connecticut
v.
Connecticut
No. 84-837.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 1985.
Published
Sup. Ct. Conn. Certiorari denied.