green
Positive treatment
1.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 6 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "but see"
Marguerite Fariss, Administratrix of the Estate of Ewell W. Fariss v. Lynchburg Foundry, a Mead Corporation, Ewell W. Fariss v. Lynchburg Foundry, a Mead Corporation
But see McDowell v. Avtex Fibers, Inc., 740 F.2d 214, 217-18 (3d Cir.1984), vacated on other grounds, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 1159 , 84 L.Ed.2d 312 (1985).
cited
Cited "but see"
Fariss v. Lynchburg Foundry
But see McDowell v. Avtex Fibers, Inc., 740 F.2d 214, 217-18 (3d Cir.1984), vacated on other grounds, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 1159 , 84 L.Ed.2d 312 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bruce Gilchrist v. Jim Slemons Imports, Inc., and Jim Slemons
See Avtex Fibers, Inc. v. McDowell, 469 U.S. 1202 , 105 S.Ct. 1159 , 84 L.Ed.2d 312 (1985); Prudential Federal Savings & Loan Association v. EEOC, 469 U.S. 1154 , 105 S.Ct. 896 , 83 L.Ed.2d 913 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Bonura v. Chase Manhattan Bank, NA
Accord McDowell v. Avtex Fibers, Inc., 740 F.2d 214, 215-17 (3d Cir.1984), vacated and remanded on other grounds, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 1159 , 84 L.Ed.2d 312 (1985); EEOC v. Sandia Corp., 639 F.2d 600, 624-26 (10th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gelof v. Papineau
See also McDowell v. Avtex Fibers, Inc., 740 F.2d 214 (3d Cir.1984), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 469 U.S. 1202 , 105 S.Ct. 1159 , 84 L.Ed.2d 312 (1985) (the collateral source rule applies only to private employers).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Slenkamp v. Borough of Brentwood
See also Avtex Fibers, Inc. v. McDowell, 740 F.2d 214 (3d Cir.1984), cert. granted, vacated and remanded for consideration in light of TWA v. Thurston, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 1159 , 84 L.Ed.2d 312 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
In re Disbarment of Hutchins
No. D-473.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1985.
Published
It is ordered that Robert White Hutchins, of Columbia, N. C., be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.