green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 4×
11.2 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1989 ·
…one who seeks to justify closure of a criminal trial carries a heavy burden
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 35 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Kenneth Laughlin and John Donnelly, Harris Goldman
(2×)
But see United States v. Johnson & Towers, Inc., 741 F.2d 662, 667-68 (3d Cir.1984) (stating in dicta that knowledge of the absence of a permit is required for conviction under section 6928(d)(2)(A)), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1171 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Clark Davis v. Dan M. Reynolds, Warden and Robert H. Henry, Attorney General
impact of partial closure is 'not a kind presented when a proceeding is totally closed to the public, and therefore only a "substantial" rather than "compelling" reason for the closure is necessary.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Mariela Pareja
because the evidence is sufficient to sustain the convictions ... it would have been improper for the trial court to grant the defendants' motions for judgments of acquittal.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Klem
(2×)
one who seeks to justify closure of a criminal trial carries a heavy burden
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
State v. Crampton
it seems to us that 10-306(b) was designed to subordinate the admissibility of alcohol test results to the timely assertion of the defendant's right of confrontation.
discussed
Cited "see"
Motor Vehicle Administration v. Atterbeary
“We have consistently recognized that the statutory provisions enacted to enforce the State’s fight against drunken driving, namely Md.Code ... § 10-302 to -309 of the Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article and § 16-205.1 of the Transportation Article, were enacted for the protection of the public and not primarily for the protection of the accused.” Motor Vehicle Admin. v. Shrader, 324 Md. 454, 464 , 597 A.2d 939, 943 (1991); see State v. Moon, 291 Md. 463, 477 , 436 A.2d 420, 427 (1981), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1207 , 105 S.Ct. 1170 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Sauls
See, State v. Moon, 291 Md. 463 , 436 A.2d 420 (1981), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1207 , 105 S.Ct. 1170 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985); Langway v. State, 94 Md.App. 407 , 617 A.2d 1117 (1993). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel M. Paradies, the Paradies Shops, Inc., Paradies Midfield Corporation, Ira Jackson
See United States v. Gregory, 730 F.2d 692, 700 (11th Cir.1984) (technical violations alone do not give rise to a substantial violation of the Act), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1170, 1171 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985); see also United States v. Barnette, 800 F.2d 1558 , 1568-69 & n. 14 (11th Cir.1986) (upholding district court’s granting of hardship excuse to 245 out of 249 jurors after a personal, pre-voir dire review of juror questionnaires), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 935 , 107 S.Ct. 1578 , 94 L.Ed.2d 769 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Paradies
See United States v. Gregory, 730 F.2d 692, 700 (11th Cir.1984) (technical violations alone do not give rise to a substantial violation of the Act), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1170, 1171 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985); see also United States v. Barnette, 800 F.2d 1558 , 1568-69 & n. 14 (11th Cir.1986) (upholding district court's granting of hardship excuse to 245 out of 249 jurors after a personal, pre-voir dire review of juror questionnaires), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 935 , 107 S.Ct. 1578 , 94 L.Ed.2d 769 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
Simmons v. State
See Moon v. State, 300 Md. 354, 367 , 478 A.2d 695 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1207 , 105 S.Ct. 1170 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven M. Self
(2×)
Accord United States v. Johnson & Towers, Inc., 741 F.2d 662, 670 (3d Cir.1984) (“knowledge” in a RCRA criminal prosecution “may be inferred by the jury as to those individuals who hold the requisite responsible positions with the corporate defendant”), cer t. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1171 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Chapman v. State
Accord Moon v. State, 300 Md. 354, 366 , 478 A.2d 695, 701 (1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1207 , 105 S.Ct. 1170 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985) (exceptions to rule requiring cross-examination permitted in past only “ ‘after close scrutiny has disclosed that this type of evidence is both necessary and so intrinsically reliable that it need not be subjected to the rigors of cross-examination’ ” (emphasis in original) (quoting State v. Collins, 265 Md. 70, 78 , 288 A.2d 163, 167 (1972)); State v. Roby, 463 N.W.2d 506, 509 (Minn.1990) (stating that Confrontation Clause analysis entails inquiry int…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael Robert Speach
(2×)
See id. at 1037-38 (declining to follow United States v. Johnson & Towers, Inc., 741 F.2d 662, 668 (3d Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1171 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985), which read a knowledge requirement into § 6928(d)(2)(A)).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jack Ivey and William \Rusty\" Wallace
(2×)
See United States v. Johnson & Towers, Inc., 741 F.2d 662, 666 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1171 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Eddy F. Fernandez
See United States v. Gregory, 730 F.2d 692, 706 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 [ 105 S.Ct. 1170 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 ] (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Andrew Forga Coldwell, United States of America v. James Douglas Wilson, United States of America v. Andrew Forga Coldwell, United States of America v. James Douglas Wilson
See United States v. Kalish, 734 F.2d 194 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1207 , 105 S.Ct. 1169 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985). 9 Whether a prosecution is barred by double jeopardy is determined by reference to the test enunciated by the Supreme Court in Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299, 304 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932): 10 [W]here the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of an additional fact which the other…
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Coldwell
See United States v. Kalish, 734 F.2d 194 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1207 , 105 S.Ct. 1169 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel Phisco Ramirez, United States v. Jairo Vanegas-Ortiz, United States v. Jose Victor Santiago-Escobar, United States v. Roberto Piedrahita-Santiago, United States v. Anibal Pelaez-Escobar, United States v. Reyes Cardales-Barrios
See United States v. Gregory, 730 F.2d 692, 699 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1170 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985); United States v. Nelson, 718 F.2d 315, 319 (9th Cir.1983); United States v. Hawkins, 566 F.2d 1006, 1014-15 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 848 , 99 S.Ct. 150 , 58 L.Ed.2d 151 (1978); United States v. Kennedy, 548 F.2d 608, 614 (5th Cir., cert. denied, 434 U.S. 865 , 98 S.Ct. 199 , 54 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977). 42 The jury clerk here was responding to an emergency situation.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Ramirez
See United States v. Gregory, 730 F.2d 692, 699 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1170 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985); United States v. Nelson, 718 F.2d 315, 319 (9th Cir.1983); United States v. Hawkins, 566 F.2d 1006, 1014-15 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 848 , 99 S.Ct. 150 , 58 L.Ed.2d 151 (1978); United States v. Kennedy, 548 F.2d 608, 614 (5th Cir., cert. denied, 434 U.S. 865 , 98 S.Ct. 199 , 54 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Theresa M. Sellers
See generally United States v. Greer, 850 F.2d at 1450 (question under Rule 29 is whether a reasonable jury could have found defendant guilty); accord United States v. Gregory, 730 F.2d 692, 706 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1170, 1171 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hughes v. Bowers
See Douglas v. Wainwright, 714 F.2d 1532, 1554 (11th Cir.1983), vacated for reconsideration on other grounds, 468 U.S. 1206 , 104 S.Ct. 3575 , 82 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984), original disposition reaffirmed, 739 F.2d 531 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1170 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985). 2 The respondent has not sought an evidentiary hearing and has argued that none is necessary for resolution of the issues.
discussed
Cited "see"
Ip v. Henderson
See Douglas v. Wainwright, 739 F.2d 531, 532 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1170 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985) (distinguishing Waller based on Waller’s total, rather than partial, closure).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Jones
See United States v. Evans, 526 F.2d 701, 703 (5th Cir.1976), United States v. Gregory, 730 F.2d 692, 699 (11th Cir.1984) cert. denied 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1170 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Billie
(2×)
See United States v. Johnson & Towers, Inc., 741 F.2d 662, 666 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1171 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
(2×)
Morissette, 342 U.S. at 262 , 72 S.Ct. at 249 ; accord United States v. Johnson & Towers, Inc., 741 F.2d 662, 665 (3d Cir.1984) ("[T]hough the result may appear harsh, it is well established that criminal penalties attached to regulatory statutes intended to protect public health, in contrast to statutes based on common law crimes, are to be construed to effectuate the regulatory purpose."), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1171 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985). 26 As noted above, the MBTA is a regulatory measure designed to protect the public welfare, derived not from the common law but from a …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Engler
(2×)
Morissette, 342 U.S. at 262 , 72 S.Ct. at 249 ; accord United States v. Johnson & Towers, Inc., 741 F.2d 662, 665 (3d Cir.1984) (“[T]hough the result may appear harsh, it is well established that criminal penalties attached to regulatory statutes intended to protect public health, in contrast to statutes based on common law crimes, are to be construed to effectuate the regulatory purpose.”), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1171 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Osborn v. Schillinger
See Douglas v. Wainwright, 714 F.2d 1532 (11th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1170 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. William M. Percival, Carolyn Allen Percival, Randy L. Middleton, Defendants
See United States v. Gregory, 730 F.2d 692, 699 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 1170 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985); 28 U.S.C. § 1863 (b)(3) (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bronx Reptiles, Inc.
(2×)
See also Johnson & Towers, Inc., 741 F.2d 662, 666 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, Angel v. United States, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1171 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985); United States v. St.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Reilly
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Johnson & Towers, Inc., 741 F.2d 662, 665 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied sub nom., 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1171 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James F. Brennan, United States v. J. Edward McHugh
See, e.g., United States v. Gregory, 730 F.2d 692, 701 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1170, 1171 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985); United States v. Beran, 546 F.2d 1316, 1321 (8th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 916 , 97 S.Ct. 1330 , 51 L.Ed.2d 595 (1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Sams
See, e.g., Douglas v. Wainwright, 714 F.2d 1532, 1537 (11th Cir.1983), judgment vacated and remanded, 468 U.S. 1206 , 104 S.Ct. 3575 , 82 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984), appeal after remand, 739 F.2d 531 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1170 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marvin Edwin Johnson v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
(2×)
See also Douglas v. Wainwright, 714 F.2d 1532, 1554-58 (11th Cir.1983), vacated, 468 U.S. 1206 , 104 S.Ct. 3575 , 82 L.Ed.2d 874 (1984), reinstated, 739 F.2d 531 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1170 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985); Heiney v. Dugger, 558 So.2d 398 (Fla.1990); Stevens v. State, 552 So.2d at 1085-88 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Weslie C. Mays
See, e.g., United States v. Gregory, 730 F.2d 692, 697 (11th Cir.) cert. denied 469 U.S. 1208 , 105 S.Ct. 1170 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Thomas E. Byrd
See, e.g., United States v. Gregory, 730 F.2d 692, 698 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1170 , 84 L.Ed.2d 321 (1985); United States v. Seiffert, 501 F.2d 974, 982 (5th Cir.1974) (Seiffert II).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Angel
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 84-586.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1985.
Cited by 9 opinions | Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Certiorari denied.