green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.9 score
“a container that proclaims its contents on the outside is not a private place”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 34 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Randolph Williams
a container that proclaims its contents on the outside is not a private place
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States Ex Rel. Kytka v. Washington
The envelope clearly indicated that it contained a safety deposit box key, and given that there was probable cause to search the house for cocaine and currency, “[t]he agent was entitled to infer that [the suspect] had a safe-deposit box that might well contain cocaine, money from selling cocaine, or both.” Id. at 439.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Jones
In United States v. Eschweiler, 745 F.2d 435 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 1188 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985), the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, although refraining from adopting the Waterman rule, stated: “Of course there are limits to how far the government may go to induce a witness to cooperate.” Id. at 439.
cited
Cited "see"
Hardwick v. Amsted Railway Co., Inc.
See Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387, 1396 (10th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Meyer v. Nava
See Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387, 1396 (10th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Farmland Industries, Inc. v. National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh
See Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387, 1396 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985). 12 .
cited
Cited "see"
Beams v. Norton
See Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387, 1396 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985). 10 .
cited
Cited "see"
Farmland Indus., Inc. v. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INS. CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA
See Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387, 1396 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985). 10 .
cited
Cited "see"
B-S Steel of Kansas, Inc. v. Texas Industries, Inc.
See Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387, 1396 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Neal v. Lewis
See Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387, 1396 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Pritchett v. Western Resources, Inc.
See Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387, 1396 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985). 10 .
cited
Cited "see"
Klindt v. Honeywell International Inc.
See Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387, 1396 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985). 17 .
cited
Cited "see"
Busey v. BD. OF COUNTY COM'RS, COUNTY, SHAWNEE, KS
See Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387, 1396 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Kindergartners Count, Inc. v. DeMoulin
See Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387, 1396 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Kindergartners Count, Inc. v. Demoulin
See Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387, 1396 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985). 10 .
cited
Cited "see"
Munoz v. Western Resources, Inc.
See Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387, 1396 (10th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985). 12 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Tungol v. Certainteed Corp.
See Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387, 1396 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985). 9 . 42 U.S.C. sec.2000e-5(e); 29 U.S.C. sec. 626 (d); see Aramburu v. Boeing Co., 112 F.3d 1398, 1411 (10th Cir.1997) (Title VII) (citing Jones v. Runyon, 91 F.3d 1398, 1400 (10th Cir.1996), ce rt. denied 520 U.S. 1115 , 117 S.Ct. 1243 , 137 L.Ed.2d 326 (1997)); Smith v. Board of County Comm'rs of Johnson County, Kan., 96 F.Supp.2d 1177, 1185 (D.Kan.2000) (ADEA). 10 .
cited
Cited "see"
Searcy v. Simmons
See Bee v. Chreaves, 744 F.2d 1387, 1393-94 (10th Cir.1984) (First Amendment protects communication of ideas), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Irvin T. Wilson, Jr.
See United States v. Eschweiler, 745 F.2d 435, 437 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1188 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985) (noting that taped conversations between undercover agents or informants and suspects are admissible); United States v. Craig, 573 F.2d 455, 474 (7th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 820 , 99 S.Ct. 82 , 58 L.Ed.2d 110 (1978); see also 18 U.S.C. §§ 2511 (2)(c), 2515.
discussed
Cited "see"
O'CONNER v. Commonwealth Edison Co.
See, Stibitz v. General Public Utilities Corp., 746 F.2d 993 (3rd Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985); Kiick v. Metropolitan Edison Company, 784 F.2d 490 (3rd Cir.1986); Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. General Public Utilities Corp., 710 F.2d 117 (3rd Cir.1983); Duke Power Company v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, 438 U.S. 59 , 98 S.Ct. 2620 , 57 L.Ed.2d 595 (1978); Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp., 464 U.S. 238 , 104 S.Ct. 615 , 78 L.Ed.2d 443 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Bee v. Greaves
See Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985) (Bee I).
cited
Cited "see"
Daniel Howard Bee v. Dr. Keith Greaves and Medic Keith Hughes, and Dr. Robert Greer, Daniel Howard Bee v. Dr. Keith Greaves, Medic Keith Hughes, and Dr. Robert Greer
See Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985) (Bee I ).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Miles
See United States v. Eschweiler, 745 F.2d 435 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1188 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985) (holding that an en velope labelled as a safe deposit key and containing the name of a bank could be opened; the agent was entitled to infer that the envelope contained a key).
discussed
Cited "see"
People v. Medina
See sections 27-10-107, -108, and -109, 11 C.R.S. (1982). [2] Several courts have alluded to a constitutional basis for an involuntarily committed patient's right to refuse treatment by antipsychotic medication, including the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, see Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985); Johnson v. Silvers, 742 F.2d 823 (4th Cir.1984); Rogers v. Okin, 738 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1984); Project Release v. Prevost, 722 F.2d 960 (2d Cir.1983); Rennie v. Klein, 720 F.2d 266 (3d Cir.1983); Stensvad v. Re…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Coleman v. Wilson
Washington, 494 U.S. at 232-233 , 110 S.Ct. at 1042-43 ; see also Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387, 1395-96 (10th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985) (even in an emergency, decision to administer involuntary medication is a medical decision).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Field
See also United States v. Eschweiler, 745 F.2d 435, 438 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1188 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985) (acknowledging Taborda but leaving question open); United States v. Christensen, 524 F.Supp. 344, 347 (N.D.Ill.1981) (Upholding a search where the binoculars used “[did] not rely on laser beams or infra red light to detect images not otherwise visible.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Amati v. City of Woodstock, Ill.
The Seventh Circuit has held, “[although Title Ill’s suppression remedy [of the Crime Control Act] has its roots in the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule, it is not simply co-extensive with that rule.” United States v. Dorfman, 690 F.2d 1217, 1227 (7th Cir.1982), aff'd sub nom. in United States v. Williams, 737 F.2d 594 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1003 , 105 S.Ct. 1354 , 84 L.Ed.2d 377 (1985); see also United States v. Eschweiler, 745 F.2d 435, 437 (7th Cir.1984) (addressing contentions that recorded conversations violated Fourth Amendment and Title III of the Crime Control A…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Cruz Corral
See also United States v. Eschweiler, 745 F.2d 435, 440 (7th Cir.1984) (police may open envelope that clearly contained key) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1188 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985); United States v. Morgan, 744 F.2d 1215, 1222 (6th Cir.1984) (police may open bottle without a warrant where label on bottle made it apparent that the bottle contained contraband).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Edward Lee Donnes
See e.g., United States v. Es- *1438 chweiler, 745 F.2d 435, 440 (7th Cir.1984) (police could open envelope which clearly indicated it contained key), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1188 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985); United States v. Morgan, 744 F.2d 1215, 1222 (6th Cir.1984) (police could open bottle without a warrant where label on bottle made it apparent that it contained contraband).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Bell v. County of Washington County, Iowa
See also Bee v. Greaves, 744 F.2d 1387, 1395 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1214 , 105 S.Ct. 1187 , 84 L.Ed.2d 334 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ralph Walters v. Western State Hospital, Ft. Supply, Oklahoma, and Patrick W. Dudley, M.D., and E.B. Lasmarias, M.D.
In addition, we stated that the "availability of alternative, less restrictive courses of action should also be considered." Id.; see also id. at 1396 n. 7.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ralph Partridge and Betty Partridge v. Two Unknown Police Officers of the City of Houston, Texas
(2×)
Daniels specifically preserved the callous indifference standard of Estelle v. Gamble. --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. at 664, 88 L.Ed.2d at 667 10 See Carpenters Local Union No. 1846 v. Pratt-Farnsworth, Inc., 690 F.2d 489 , 500 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 932 , 104 S.Ct. 335 , 78 L.Ed.2d 305 (1983) 11 Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46 , 78 S.Ct. 99, 101-102 , 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957); see also Cook & Nichol, Inc. v. Plimsoll Club, 451 F.2d 505, 506 (5th Cir.1971) 12 429 U.S. at 106 , 97 S.Ct. at 292 13 Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520 , 99 S.Ct. 1861 , 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979) 14 441 U.S. at 539…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Dalton
See also United States v. Eschweiler, 745 F.2d 435 (7th Cir. 1984) (recording devices used by undercover agent in suspect's home to gather information for illegal drug sale not violative of Fourth Amendment), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1214 , 84 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Eschweiler
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 84-1005.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 19, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: D.C. Circuit (1)
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.