green
Positive treatment
10.5 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 32 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Alvaro Rojo-Alvarez, United States v. Adalberto Franco-Montoya, United States v. Walter Antonio Palacio-Perez, United States v. Carlos Arevalo-Gomez
(2×)
Id. at 505.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Neal R. Bruckman
Id. at 507 (no violation where text of order taken together with subsequent statements explains factual basis under relevant criteria).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Barnes
See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 507 (1st Cir.1984) (“[I]t is not necessary for the court to articulate the basic facts when they are obvious and set forth in a motion for a continuance.”), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Geraldo Rodriguez, A/K/A Jose Rodriguez
See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 502 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); see also United States v. Montoya, 827 F.2d 143, 151 (7th Cir.1987); United States v. Velasquez, 802 F.2d 104, 105 (4th Cir.1986); United States v. Novak, 715 F.2d 810, 813 (3d Cir.1983), ce rt. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Campbell v. Fasco Industries, Inc.
See Monroe v. United Air Lines, Inc., 736 F.2d 394, 403 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1356 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Bennett v. United States
See Monroe v. United Air Lines, Inc., 736 F.2d 394, 409 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1356 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
In re Air Crash Disaster at Detroit Metropolitan Airport on August 16, 1987
See United States v. Barth, 591 F.Supp. 91, 97 (D.Conn.), aff'd in part, rev’d in part on other grounds, 745 F.2d 184 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1356 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc. And Gerald O. Philpot
(2×)
See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 504 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. McGrath, 613 F.2d 361, 366 (2d Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 967 , 100 S.Ct. 2946 , 64 L.Ed.2d 827 (1980); United States v. Novak, 715 F.2d 810, 815 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1030 , 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984); United States v. Holyfield, 802 F.2d 846, 848 (6th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1090 , 107 S.Ct. 1298 , 94 L.Ed.2d 154 (1987); United States v. Fogarty, 692 F.2d 542, 546 (8th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S.…
discussed
Cited "see"
E.I. DuPont De Nemours & Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
See Monroe v. United Air Lines, Inc., 736 F.2d 394, 408 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1356 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); Glick v. White Motor Co., 458 F.2d 1287, 1291 (3d Cir.1972); New Amsterdam Cas.
cited
Cited "see"
Biller v. Lopes
See United States v. Barth, 745 F.2d 184, 187 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1356 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 657 F.2d at 8 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Felton
See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 509 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. Ross, 654 F.2d 612, 616 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 926 , 102 S.Ct. 1290 , 71 L.Ed.2d 470 (1982); United States v. Russo, 550 F.Supp. 1315, 1319 (D.N.J.1982), aff'd, 722 F.2d 736 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1045 , 104 S.Ct. 716 , 79 L.Ed.2d 179 (1984). 40 In the case at hand, the question is whether the exclusion extends to any of the time that elapsed between the date this court originally issued its mandate and when we later …
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Felton
See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 509 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. Ross, 654 F.2d 612, 616 (9th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 926 , 102 S.Ct. 1290 , 71 L.Ed.2d 470 (1982); United States v. Russo, 550 F.Supp. 1315, 1319 (D.N.J.1982), aff'd, 722 F.2d 736 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1045 , 104 S.Ct. 716 , 79 L.Ed.2d 179 (1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Moll v. U.S. Life Title Insurance Co. of New York
See United States v. Barth, 745 F.2d 184, 189 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1356 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Stacey Lynn Merkt and John B. Elder
See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 511-13 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. *955 —, 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. Middleton, 690 F.2d 820, 824-26 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1051 , 103 S.Ct. 1497 , 75 L.Ed.2d 929 (1983); Leary v. United States, 383 F.2d 851, 859-61 (5th Cir.1967), rev’d in part and remanded on other grounds, 395 U.S. 6 , 89 S.Ct. 1532 , 23 L.Ed.2d 57 (1969).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Cross-Appellant v. Jack Leroy Gallardo, Cross-Appellee
See United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 503-04 (1st Cir.1984) (noting that “[t]he Guidelines, of -course, are not binding,” especially when they appear to conflict with congressional intent), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. Novak, 715 F.2d 810, 815 (3d Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 1293 , 79 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984); see also Guidelines 16 (indicating that this circuit’s decision in United States v. Harris, 724 F.2d 1452 (9th Cir.1984), does not follow the Guidelines’s interpretation of section 3161(c)(2)).
cited
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cross-Appellee v. Fox Point-Bayside School District, Cross-Appellant
See Monroe v. United Air Lines, Inc., 736 F.2d 394, 408 (7th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 1356 , 1357, 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Two Grand Jury Subpoenae Duces Tecum, One Dated January 28, 1985, the Other Undated
(2×)
See id.
cited
Cited "see"
Rogers Transportation, Inc. v. Stern
See United States v. Barth, 745 F.2d 184, 190 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 1356 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Rogers Transportation, Inc., No. 84-3493 v. Honorable Herbert J. Stern, U.S.D.J. For the District of New Jersey, United States of America and Scott R. Hammond, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Rogers Transportation, Inc., No. 84-5556
See United States v. Barth, 745 F.2d 184, 190 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 1356 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jacqueline Allen, Clare Grady, Dean Hammer, Elizabeth McAlister Vern Rossman, Kathleen Rumpf, Karl Smith
Thus free exercise claims have had to yield before state interests in monogamy, see Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145, 161-67 , 8 Otto 145 , 161-67, 25 L.Ed. 244 (1878), in protecting children’s- health through blood transfusions, see Jehovah’s Witnesses v. King County Hospital Unit No. 1, 390 U.S. 598 , 88 S.Ct. 1260 , 20 L.Ed.2d 158 (1968) (per curiam), aff'g 278 F.Supp. 488 (W.D.Wash.1967), in assuring mandatory and continuous participation in the Social Security system, see United States v. Lee, 455 U.S. at 258-60 , 102 S.Ct. at 1055-57 , in obtaining court testimony, see Smilow v…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Dudley v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Moreover, race must be “a determinative factor in the employer’s decision, though it need not have been the solé factor.” Rollins v. TechSouth, Inc., 833 F.2d 1525 , *786 1528 (11th Cir.1987); see also Monroe v. United Air Lines, Inc., 736 F.2d 394, 402 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1356 , 1357, 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985) (circuit approval for “a determining factor” jury instruction); Cuddy v. Carmen, 694 F.2d 853, 857-58 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1034 , 106 S.Ct. 597 , 88 L.Ed.2d 576 (1985) (The plaintiff must “show by a preponderance of the evid…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Bruce Derek Spring AKA Bruce Derek Walls
The First and Third Circuits have stated that open-ended continuances to serve the ends of justice are not prohibited, provided “they are reasonable in length.” United States v. Lattany, 982 F.2d 866, 868 (3d Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 114 S.Ct. 97 , 126 L.Ed.2d 64 (1993); see also United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 508 (1st Cir.1984) (observing that “it is inevitable that in some cases, like the present one, a court is forced to order an (h)(8) continuance without knowing exactly how long the reasons supporting the continuance will remain valid”), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 100…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Brook v. City of Montgomery, Ala.
To prove discrimination after the McDonnell Douglas framework drops out, a plaintiff can show (by either presentation of evidence or cross-examination of defendant’s witnesses) that the employer’s proffered reason was a pretext for discrimination, “[b]ut a reason cannot be proved to be ‘a pretext for discrimination’ unless it is shown both that the reason was false, and that discrimination was the real reason.” Id. at 515 , 113 S.Ct. at 2752 . 13 Moreover, age must be “a determinative factor in the employer’s decision, though it need not have been the sole factor.” Rollins v.…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Douglas v. Evans
Age must be “a determinative factor in the employer’s decision, though it need not have been the sole factor.” Rollins v. TechSouth, Inc., 833 F.2d 1525, 1528 (11th Cir.1987); see also Monroe v. United Air Lines, Inc., 736 F.2d 394, 402 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1356 , 1357, 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985) (circuit approval for “a determining factor” jury instruction); Cuddy v. Carmen, 694 F.2d 853, 857-58 (D.C.Cir.1982) (Plaintiff must “show by a preponderance of the evidence that age was ‘a determining factor’ in the employer’s decision” or that age �…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lamb v. Runyon
Moreover, age must be “a determinative factor in the employer’s decision, though it need not have been the sole factor.” Rollins v. TechSouth, Inc., 833 F.2d 1525, 1528 (11th Cir.1987); see also Monroe v. United Air Lines, Inc., 736 F.2d 394, 402 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1356 , 1357, 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985) (circuit approval for “a determining factor” jury instruction); Cuddy v. Carmen, 694 F.2d 853, 857-58 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1034 , 106 S.Ct. 597 , 88 L.Ed.2d 576 (1985) (Plaintiff must “show by a preponderance of the evidence that ag…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Fred J. Greene
Middleton, 690 F.2d at 825 ; United States v. Hudson, 431 F.2d 468 , 469 (5th Cir.1970), cert. denied, 400 U.S. 1011 , 91 S.Ct. 575 , 577, 27 L.Ed.2d 624 (1971) (stating “the use of drugs as part of religious practice is not constitutionally privileged”); see also United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 513 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985) (quoting Leary v. United States, 383 F.2d 851, 861 (5th Cir.1967), rev’d on other grounds, 395 U.S. 6 , 89 S.Ct. 1532 , 23 L.Ed.2d 57 (1969), and noting the narrow administrative exception of peyote from…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hill
See, e.g., United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 514 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); United States v. Taylor, 683 F.2d 18, 21 (1st Cir.) cert. denied, 459 U.S. 945 , 103 S.Ct. 261 , 74 L.Ed.2d 203 (1982); United States v. Wright, 593 F.2d 105, 107-08 (9th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Hallsims Industrial Components
See also United States v. Barth, 745 F.2d 184,189 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1356 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985); In re Grand Jury Subpoenaes Duces Tecum, 722 F.2d 981, 986 (2d Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Joseph Shea Peeples
Compare United States v. Rush, 738 F.2d 497, 509 (1st Cir.1984) (appellants concede that waiver has effect), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1355 , 84 L.Ed.2d 378 (1985) with Pringle, 751 F.2d at 433 (appellants do not concede effectiveness of waiver). 2 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Monroe
v.
United Air Lines, Inc. and Air Line Pilots Assn., International v. Higman
v.
United Air Lines, Inc. and Air Line Pilots Assn., International v. Higman
No. 84-916; No. 84-958.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 25, 1985.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.