green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.4 score
“if a party fails to specify an issue in its motion for a directed verdict, it may not subsequently challenge the jury's verdict on that issue_”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 21 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Vernon Trujillo v. Ronald Goodman
Wright, A. Miller, & F. Elliott, Federal Practice and Procedure § 2537 (1971 and Supp. 1986); but cf. Kinzenbaw v. Deere & Co., 741 F.2d 383 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1357 , 84 L.Ed.2d 379 (1985); Martinez Moll v. Levitt & Sons, 583 F.2d 565 (1st Cir.1978); DeMarines v. KLM Royal Dutch Airlines, 580 F.2d 1193 (3d Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Brooktree Corp. v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
if a party fails to specify an issue in its motion for a directed verdict, it may not subsequently challenge the jury's verdict on that issue_
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Florence L. Barbetta, and James D. Barbetta v. S/s Bermuda Star, in Rem, Her Engines, Tackle, and MacHinery Etc.
46 u.s.c. 183c expressly invalidates any contract provision purporting to limit a ship's liability for negligence to its passengers.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Robert E. Parks and Robert L. Marietta v. David H. Fine
There, in rejecting the argument that we should ignore a limitation the applicant added to a claim during prosecution to overcome the examiner’s rejection because the examiner would have allowed the claim even without the limitations in view of another limitation which the applicant also added, “[w]e decline[d] to undertake the speculative inquiry whether, if [the patentee] had made only [the other] narrowing limitation in his claim, the examiner nevertheless would have allowed it.” Id. at 389, 222 USPQ at 933 .
cited
Cited "see"
Jacobs v. Osmose, Inc.
See Kornberg v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., 741 F.2d 1332, 1337 (11th Cir.1984), cert. 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1357 , 84 L.Ed.2d 379 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.
See Kinzenbaw v. Deere & Co., 741 F.2d 383 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1357 , 84 L.Ed.2d 379 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Drury v. Feeney
(2×)
See Louisiana State Bar Association v. Drury, 455 So.2d 1387 (La.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1358 , 84 L.Ed.2d 379 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Moleculon Research Corporation v. Cbs, Inc.
See Kinzenbaw v. Deere & Co., 741 F.2d 383 , 222 USPQ 929 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1357 , 84 L.Ed.2d 379 (1985); D.L.
cited
Cited "see"
William Brenner and Sydney Koslow v. The United States and Pitney Bowes, Inc.
See Kinzenbaw v. Deere & Co., 741 F.2d 383, 389 , 222 USPQ 929, 933 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1357 , 84 L.Ed.2d 379 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Medine v. Washington Mutual, FA
See also Kornberg v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., 741 F.2d 1332, 1336 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1357 , 84 L.Ed.2d 379 (1985) (focusing on “nexus” between the class representative’s claims or defenses and the common questions of law and fact among the class such that “the claims or defenses of the class and the class representative, arise from the same event or pattern or practice and are based on the same legal theory.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. 21 Approximately 180 Kg. Bulk Metal Drums
(2×)
See also United States v. Articles of Drug, 745 F.2d 105 , 119 n. 22 (1st Cir.1984) (a difference of opinion among experts does not present a genuine issue of material fact on the question of “general recognition”), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1358 , 84 L.Ed.2d 379 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. 21 Approximately 180 Kg. Bulk Metal Drums
(2×)
See also United States v. Articles of Drug, 745 F.2d 105 , 119 n. 22 (1st Cir.1984) (a difference of opinion among experts does not present a genuine issue of material fact on the question of "general recognition"), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1358 , 84 L.Ed.2d 379 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. 225 Cartons, More Or Less, Of An Article Or Drug
(2×)
See also United States v. Articles of Drug ... 5,906 Boxes, 745 F.2d 105, 117-18 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1358 , 84 L.Ed.2d 379 (1985) ("substantial evidence" standard not met where no showing of bioequivalency between drug in question and drug with studies on which manufacturer sought to rely). 38 The Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Generix Drug Corp., 460 U.S. 453, 454-55 , 103 S.Ct. 1298, 1299-1300 , 75 L.Ed.2d 198 (1983), defeats Sandoz's argument that it need not show the bioequivalence of the new and old FWC formulas before relying on studies c…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. 225 Cartons, More or Less, of an Article or Drug
(2×)
See also United States v. Articles of Drug ... 5,906 Boxes, 745 F.2d 105, 117-18 (1st Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1358 , 84 L.Ed.2d 379 (1985) (“substantial evidence” standard not met where no showing of bioequivalency between drug in question and drug with studies on which manufacturer sought to rely).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.
The typicality standard does not require that Smith, as the named plaintiff, “be in a position identical to that of every member of the putative class.” Aguinaga, 602 F.Supp. at 1279 (citing Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp., 522 F.2d 333, 340 (10th Cir.1975)); see also Kornberg v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., 741 F.2d 1332, 1337 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1357 , 84 L.Ed.2d 379 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard R. Vieau and Robert A. Vieau v. Japax, Inc., Japax Scientific Corporation, and Textron, Inc., Defendants/cross
(2×)
See also Kinzenbaw v. Deere & Co., 741 F.2d 383 , 222 USPQ 929 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1357 , 84 L.Ed.2d 379 (1985) (where court vacated a district court’s finding of invalidity following a settlement agreement on liability because injunctive relief was no longer possible since the subject patent had expired).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc.
See, e.g., Kinzenbaw v. Deere & Co., 741 F.2d 383, 387 , 222 USPQ 929, 931 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1357 , 84 L.Ed.2d 379 (1985). 106 Faced with its failure to have moved for directed verdict on willful infringement, Safety argues that its motion for directed verdict on infringement encompasses willfulness.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Orthokinetics, Inc. v. Safety Travel Chairs, Inc.
See, e.g., Kinzenbaw v. Deere & Co., 741 F.2d 383, 387 , 222 USPQ 929, 931 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1357 , 84 L.Ed.2d 379 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Groff v. Maryland
See also Hutcherson v. Board of Supervisors, 742 F.2d 142, 145 (4th Cir.1984), cert, denied, 470 U.S. 1004 , 105 S.Ct. 1358 , 84 L.Ed.2d 380 (1985); Strescon Industries, Inc. v. Cohen, 664 F.2d 929, 931-32 (4th Cir.1981).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph v. General Motors Corp.
Wright & A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1760 at 581; see also Kornberg v. Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc., 741 F.2d 1332 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 1357 , 84 L.Ed.2d 379 (1985); Lanner v. Wimmer, 662 F.2d 1349 (10th Cir.1981); Knuth v. Erie-Crawford Dairy Co-op.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Loctite Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Ultraseal Ltd., Appellees/cross-Appellants
Compare Prodyne Enterprises, Inc. v. Julie Pomerantz, Inc., 743 F.2d 1581, 1583 , 223 U.S.P.Q. 477, 478 (Fed.Cir.1984), and Kinzenbaw v. Deere & Co., 741 F.2d 383, 389 , 222 U.S.P.Q. 929, 933 (Fed.Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 1357 , 84 L.Ed.2d 379 (1985), where the court was unwilling under the facts there presented to "undertake the speculative inquiry” as to the necessity of certain claim amendments and otherwise to enlarge the literal scope of patent claims amended during prosecution.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Alcon Laboratories, Inc.
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 84-1032.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 25, 1985.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (1) · S.D. California (1)
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.