green
Positive treatment
Doctrinal family: Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor… ↗
Quoted verbatim 3×
8.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1991 ·
…thus, the plaintiff must allege, not only an injury to himself, but an injury to the market as well.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 33 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Nelson v. Commissioner of Correction
the new allegations introduced by in emorandum of aw in pposition to ... are not properly before the court on a motion
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Judith Nelson and Darci Anne Bowman, Cross-Appellees v. Monroe Regional Medical Center, Formerly Known as the Monroe Clinic, Cross-Appellant
(2×)
thus, the plaintiff must allege, not only an injury to himself, but an injury to the market as well.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Greenberg Ex Rel. Greenberg v. Boettcher & Co.
t is axiomatic that the complaint may not be amended by the briefs in opposition to a motion to dismiss
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Donovan v. Digital Equipment Corp.
Collectively, the factors weigh heavily against standing and the plaintiff may not proceed to a jury “merely by dressing [claims] up in the language of antitrust.” Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101, 1106 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 *785 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Saint Torrance v. Firstar
See Scheid v. Fanny Farmer Candy Shops, Inc., 859 F.2d 434, 436 (6th Cir.1988) (quoting Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101, 1106 (7th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985)).
cited
Cited "see"
Acevedo Villalobos v. Hon. Hernandez
See Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101, 1111 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985); 222 East Chestnut St.
discussed
Cited "see"
Vicom, Inc. v. Harbridge Merchant Services, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Peach Tree Bancard Corporation, Judy Elliot, James Elliot
(2×)
See Twohy v. First Nat'l Bank, 758 F.2d 1185, 1196 (7th Cir.1985) ("This circuit has recently clarified that once a district court enters judgment upon a dismissal (as opposed to a mere dismissal of the complaint), the plaintiff may amend the complaint under Rule 15(a), Fed.R.Civ.P., solely with 'leave of court' after a motion under Rule 59(e) or 60(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., has been made and the judgment has been set aside or vacated.") (citing Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101, 1111 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985)). 12 Under our …
discussed
Cited "see"
Betty ROUSH, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. KFC NATIONAL MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
See Rodgers v. Fisher Body Division, General Motors Corp., 739 F.2d 1102, 1107 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1759 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985) ("Although juries are ... accorded great discretion in determining the amount of damage awards, damages must be proved; they must not be speculative.”). 14 .
cited
Cited "see"
Graue Mill Development Corporation v. Colonial Bank & Trust Company of Chicago
See Car Carriers v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101, 1111-1112 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc. v. David Dworkin, David Dworkin v. Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc., Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc.
See Rodgers v. Fisher Body Div., G.M.C., 739 F.2d 1102, 1107 (6th Cir.1984) (condemning award of lost wages and fringe benefits where plaintiff’s counsel computed possible damages on blackboard during closing argument to jury without having developed basis for figures during trial testimony), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1759 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
R.E. Davis Chemical Corp. v. Nalco Chemical Co.
See Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101, 1111 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985); Northlake Community Hospital v. United States, 654 F.2d 1234, 1240 (7th Cir.1981) (for purposes of Fed.R.Civ.P. ís (a), which allows plaintiff to amend its complaint once as a matter of course at any time before a responsive pleading is filed, a motion to dismiss is not considered a responsive pleading). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Duane Moody v. Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Company, Inc.
Moreover, we note that the rationale behind two of the cases cited was not the excessiveness of the verdict but the plaintiff’s failure to prove “ ‘the nature and circumstances of the wrong and its effect on the plaintiff.' ” Erebia v. Chrysler Plastic Products Corp., 772 F.2d 1250, 1259 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1015 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 311 (1986) (quoting Carey v. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247, 263-64 , 98 S.Ct. 1042, 1052-53 , 55 L.Ed.2d 252 (1978)); see Rodgers v. Fisher Body Div., General Motors Corp., 739 F.2d 1102, 1108 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 ,…
cited
Cited "see"
Apex Oil Co. v. DiMauro
See Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101, 1108 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
R.J.R. Services, Inc., Individually, and D/B/A Ron Russell and Associates, and Ronald J. Russell v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company
See Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101, 1107 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985); cf. Runnemede Owners, Inc. v. Crest Mortgage Corp., 861 F.2d 1053, 1057 (7th Cir.1988). 7 .
cited
Cited "see"
Melvin K. Rowlett, Sr. v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.
See Rodgers v. Fisher Body Div., G.M.C., 739 F.2d 1102, 1109 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1759 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Andreo v. FRIEDLANDER, GAINES, COHEN, ETC.
See Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101, 1107 (7th Cir.1984) (axiomatic that complaint may not be amended by averments in briefs oppos *880 ing motion to dismiss), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985); Burns v. Preston Trucking Co., 621 F.Supp. 366, 368 (D.Conn.1985) (complaint to be examined in isolation without consideration of outside matters); Goldberg v. Meridor, 81 F.R.D. 105, 111 (S.D.N.Y.1979) (affidavits cannot cure lack of specificity in fraud complaint).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Great Escape, Inc. v. Union City Body Company, Inc.
See Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101, 1110 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985); Dunn & Mavis, Inc. v. Nu-Car Driveaway, Inc., 691 F.2d 241, 245 (6th Cir.1982) (“Chrysler’s substitution of one auto transport company for another at its Warren plant does not limit competition in any substantial sense.
cited
Cited "see"
American Floral Services, Inc. v. Florists' Transworld Delivery Ass'n
See Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 561 F.Supp. 885 (N.D.Ill.1983), aff'd, 745 F.2d 1101 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Dunham v. Independence Bank of Chicago
See Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 561 F.Supp. 885 , 889 & n. 12 (N.D.Ill.1983), aff' d, 745 F.2d 1101, 1111-12 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Melvin A. Seglin, M.D. v. Truman Esau
See Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101, 1106 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985); Sutliff, Inc. v. Donovan Companies, Inc., 727 F.2d 648, 654 (7th Cir.1984); Havoco of Am., Ltd. v. Shell Oil Co., 626 F.2d 549, 553 (7th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see"
Board of School Directors of Milwaukee v. Wisconsin
(2×)
See Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Company, 745 F.2d 1101, 1106 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Weinstein v. United States Air Force
See, e.g., Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101, 1107 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985)(it is “axiomatic that the complaint may not be amended by the briefs in opposition to a motion to dismiss.”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
DM Research, Inc. v. College of American Pathologists
See, e.g., Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101, 1106 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985); Dartmouth Review v. Dartmouth College, 889 F.2d 13, 16 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. AVXCorp., 962 F.2d 108, 115 (1st Cir.1992); see also 5A Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure § 1357, at 317-18 (2d ed.1990). 2 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
M & Z CAB CORP. v. City of Chicago
See e.g., Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101, 1107 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Janice E. Hetzel v. County of Prince William Charlie T. Deane, and G.W. Jones C.E. O'shields, Janice E. Hetzel v. County of Prince William Charlie T. Deane, and G.W. Jones C.E. O'shields, (Two Cases)
See, e.g., Rodgers v. Fisher Body Div., 739 F.2d 1102, 1108 (6th Cir.1984) (holding that plaintiff's own brief testimony that he was forced to go on welfare and had his car repossessed causing humiliation and distress was insufficient to support a sizeable award for emotional distress), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1759 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985); cf. Carey v. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247, 264 , 98 S.Ct. 1042, 1052 , 55 L.Ed.2d 252 (1978) ("[A]lthough mental and emotional distress ... is compensable under § 1983, we hold that neither the likelihood of such injury nor the difficulty of proving…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hetzel v. County of Prince William
See, e.g., Rodgers v. Fisher Body Div., 739 F.2d 1102, 1108 (6th Cir.1984) (holding that plaintiffs own brief testimony that he was forced to go on welfare and had his car repossessed causing humiliation and distress was insufficient to support a sizeable award for emotional distress), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1759 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985); cf. Carey v. Piphus, 435 U.S. 247, 264 , 98 S.Ct. 1042, 1052 , 55 L.Ed.2d 252 (1978) (“[Ajlthough mental and emotional distress ... is compensable under § 1983, we hold that neither the likelihood of such injury nor the difficulty of provin…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Caribe BMW, Inc. v. Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft
See, e.g., Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101, 1110 (7th Cir.1984) (“[Unvocation of antitrust terms of art does not confer immunity from a motion to dismiss....”), cer t. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985); Kaiser Aluminum v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc., 677 F.2d 1045, 1050 (5th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1105 , 103 S.Ct. 729 , 74 L.Ed.2d 953 (1983); Klebanow v. New York Produce Exchange, 344 F.2d 294, 299 (2d Cir.1965). (d) Section 2(f) Caribe also charges BMW NA with knowingly receiving a forbidden price discrimination in violation of sect…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Molecular Technology Corp. v. Valentine
See also Rodgers v. Fisher Body Div., General Motors Cory., 739 F.2d 1102, 1106 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1759 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985); Finch v. Monumental Life Ins.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,860, 32 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 374 Molecular Technology Corporation, an Ohio Corporation Jafar Behbehani and Michael May, (89-1842), (89-1758) v. Al Valentine, (89-1758), (89-1842), Donovan C. Snyder Moss and Wilkins, (89-1843), (89-1842), Jack Hunter Jim Fors, First National Monetary Group, Inc. First National Securities Corporation
See also Rodgers v. Fisher Body Div., General Motors Corp., 739 F.2d 1102, 1106 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1759 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985); Finch v. Monumental Life Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sears, Roebuck and Co., Inc. v. Boyd
Compare, Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co. (7th Cir.1984), 745 F.2d 1101, 1107 , cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985) (complaint may not be amended by briefs in opposition to a motion to dismiss). 2 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Rutman Wine Company v. E. & J. Gallo Winery
See also Car Carriers v. Ford Motor Company, 745 F.2d 1101,1108 (7th Cir.1984), cert, denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Decker Coal Co.
See, e.g., Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101,1112 (7th Cir.1984), cert, denied, 470 U.S. 1054 , 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985); Egger v. Phillips, 710 F.2d 292, 329 (7th Cir.), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 918 , 104 S.Ct. 284 , 78 L.Ed.2d 262 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Prudential Insurance Co. v. Curt Bullock Builders, Inc.
Twohy v. First National Bank of Chicago, 758 F.2d 1185 (7th Cir.1985); see also Car Carriers, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 745 F.2d 1101 (7th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 1758 , 84 L.Ed.2d 821 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Car Carriers, Inc.
v.
Ford Motor Co.
v.
Ford Motor Co.
No. 84-1213.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 1985.
Cited by 231 opinions | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.