green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
11.0 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case ·
…if disqualification for cause is improperly denied, but the accused has not exercised all allowable peremptory challenges, there is no reversible error.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
TETSO v. State
(2×)
if disqualification for cause is improperly denied, but the accused has not exercised all allowable peremptory challenges, there is no reversible error.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Jimmy Davis, Jr. v. Commissioner, Alabama DOC
As Justice Marshall explained, “[ijt approaches the most lit- eral sense of the word ‘arbitrary’ to put one to death in the face of a contrary jury determination where it is accepted that the jury had indeed responsibly carried out its task.” Jones v. Alabama, 470 U.S. 1062, 1065 (1985) (Marshall, J., dissenting).! 21 The Supreme Court approved similar schemes in other states as well.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Jimmy Davis, Jr. v. Commissioner, Alabama DOC
As Justice Marshall explained, “[i]t approaches the most lit- eral sense of the word ‘arbitrary’ to put one to death in the face of a contrary jury determination where it is accepted that the jury had indeed responsibly carried out its task.” Jones v. Alabama, 470 U.S. 1062, 1065 (1985) (Marshall, J., dissenting).21 21 The Supreme Court approved similar schemes in other states as well.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Johnson v. Alabama
Therefore, I would grant the petition for writ of certiorari and vacate petitioner’s death sentence for the reasons I expressed in Jones v. Alabama, 470 U. S. 1062, 1063 (1985) (Marshall, J., dissenting).
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Brown v. Rice
The state accomplished, through its use of peremptory challenges, what it could not constitutionally do through challenges for cause, i.e., “stack the deck against the petitioner.” Witherspoon, 391 U.S. at 523 , 105 S.Ct. at 1778.
cited
Cited "see"
Pete Alex v. United States
See United States v. Stull, 743 F.2d 439, 448 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1062 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roderic Carter
See United States v. Stull, 743 F.2d 439, 445 (6th Cir.1984) (because the district court’s determinations of relevancy depend on the exercise of considerable judgment within the context of the entire trial, appellate courts should not lightly overrule the trial court’s decision), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 1779 , 84 L.Ed.2d 838 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gyan Parkash Syal
See United States v. Stull, 743 F.2d 439 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 1779 , 84 L.Ed.2d 838 (1985) (application of rule allowing separate sentence for each use of mails in mail fraud case); United States v. Fermin Castillo, 829 F.2d 1194 (1st Cir.1987) (application of same rule to wire fraud), cited with approval in United States v. Busacca, 936 F.2d 232, 239 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 112 S.Ct. 595 , 116 L.Ed.2d 619 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Peter Richard Tripp and Richard Alfred Fonseca
In order to obtain reversal on appeal, a defendant has the " 'heavy burden of showing specific and compelling prejudice resulting from a joint trial which can be rectified only by separate trials.' ... [T]he error requires reversal only 'if the misjoinder results in actual prejudice because it had substantial and injurious effect or influence in determining the jury's verdict.' " United States v. Davis, 809 F.2d 1194, 1207 (6th Cir.) (quoting United States v. Dempsey, 733 F.2d 392, 398 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 983 (1984)), cert. denied, 483 U.S. 1007 (1987); see United States v. Stul…
cited
Cited "see"
Siebert v. State
See Jones v. State , 456 So.2d 366 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983), affirmed, 456 So.2d 380 (Ala. 1984), cert. denied, Jones v. Alabama , 470 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 1779 , 84 L.Ed.2d 838 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Willie Joseph Causey, Jr.
(2×)
See United States v. Stull, 743 F.2d 439, 446-47 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 1779 , 84 L.Ed.2d 838 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Theodore Wright, Leo Savage & Johnny Ringo
See United States v. Stull, 743 F.2d 439, 447 (6th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1062 (1985) (and cases cited therein). 11 Wright and Savage respond that it is doubtful that with such complicated facts, presented over a twenty-five day period, the jury was able to draw any clear distinction between appellants and their codefendants.
cited
Cited "see"
United States of America, (86-5282), (86-5625) v. Robert L. \Bob\" Watts
See United States v. Stull, 743 F.2d 439, 442 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1062 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lockhart v. State
See, e.g., Ex parte Jones, 456 So.2d 380, 381-83 (Ala.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 1779 , 84 L.Ed.2d 838 (1985); McMillian v. State, 594 So.2d at 1272; Parker v. State, 587 So.2d 1072, 1098 (Ala.Cr.App.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Stanley v. State
See, e.g., Ex parte Jones, 456 So.2d 380, 381-83 (Ala.1984), cert, denied, 470 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 1779 , 84 L.Ed.2d 838 (1985); McMillian v. State, 594 So.2d at 1272; Parker v. State, 587 So.2d 1072, 1098 (Ala.Cr.App.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McMillan v. State
See, e.g., Ex parte Jones, 456 So.2d 380, 381-83 (Ala.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 1779 , 84 L.Ed.2d 838 (1985); McMillian v. State, 594 So.2d at 1272; Parker v. State, 587 So.2d 1072, 1098 (Ala.Cr.App.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doster v. State
See, e.g., Ex parte Jones, 456 So.2d 380, 381-83 (Ala.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 1779 , 84 L.Ed.2d 838 (1985); McMillian v. State, 594 So.2d at 1272; Parker v. State, 587 So.2d 1072, 1098 (Ala.Cr.App.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. State
See, e.g., Ex parte Jones, 456 So.2d 380, 381-83 (Ala. 1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 1779 , 84 L.Ed.2d 838 (1985); McMillian v. State, 594 So.2d at 1272; Parker v. State, 587 So.2d 1072, 1098 (Ala.Cr.App.1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Griffiths
(2×)
See also White v. State, 300 Md. 719, 726 , 481 A.2d 201, 204 (1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 1779 , 84 L.Ed.2d 837 (1985); Reed v. State, 225 Md. 566 , 171 A.2d 464 (1961), cert. denied, 368 U.S. 958 , 82 S.Ct. 402 , 7 L.Ed.2d 390 (1962); Buckner v. State, 11 Md.App. 55, 57-58 , 272 A.2d 828, 830-831 (1971); Sands v. State, 9 Md.App. 71, 78-79, 262 A.2d 583, 588 (1970).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carr v. State
See, e.g., Ex parte Jones , 456 So.2d 380 , 381-83 (Ala. 1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 1779 , 84 L.Ed.2d 838 (1985); McMillian v. State , 594 So.2d at 1272; Parker v. State , 587 So.2d 1072 , 1098 (Ala.Cr.App. 1991).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Connie K. Bennett
United States v. Fermin Castillo, 829 F.2d 1194, 1199-1200 (1st Cir.1987); see also United States v. Stull, 743 F.2d 439, 444-45 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1062 (1985); Bozel v. United States, 139 F.2d 153, 155-56 (6th Cir.1943), cert. denied, 321 U.S. 800 (1944). 7 Bennett also asserts that the district court erred by ordering her to pay restitution.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Curtis Napier, Ray Hernandez, Tommy L. Chatfield, Brenda Harris, Ralph Jackson
See, e.g., United States v. Stull, 743 F.2d 439, 442 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 470 U.S. 1062 (1985). 9 The evidence shows that Harris distributed heroin and sold cocaine to other members of the enterprise.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Siebert v. State
See also id. , at 479 [ 86 S.Ct., at 1630 ] Just last Term in considering when Miranda applied we noted that that decision announced procedural safeguards including 'the now familiar Miranda warnings . . . or their equivalent. ' Rhode Island v. Innis , 446 U.S. 291 , 297 [ 100 S.Ct. 1682 , 1688 , 64 L.Ed.2d 297 ] (1980) (emphasis supplied)." The language set out above was followed by this court in Jones v. State , 456 So.2d 366 , 373 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983), aff'd , 456 So.2d 380 (Ala. 1984), cert. denied , 470 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 1779 , 84 L.Ed.2d 838 (1985), wherein we stated: "The Miranda deci…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. John T. Kilpatrick and William A. Todd
See, e.g., United States v. Stull, 743 F.2d 439, 446-47 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied 470 U.S. 1062 (1985). 11 Todd argues that a mistrial should have been granted on the basis of prosecutorial misconduct.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Linell
v.
Arkansas
v.
Arkansas
No. 84-5716.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 18, 1985.
Brennan, Certiorari.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: Court of Special Appeals of Ma… (2)
Sup. Ct. Ark. Certio-rari denied.
Justice Brennan and Justice Marshall would grant certiorari.