green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.0 score
“county of oneida”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Ortega-Maldonado v. Allstate Insurance
See, Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 470 U.S. 373, 375 , 105 S.Ct. 1327 , 84 L.Ed.2d 274 (1985)(a Federal Court must first consider the law of the State in which a Judgment was rendered when determining the preclusive effect to be accorded that Judgment), reh’g denied, 471 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 2127 , 85 L.Ed.2d 491 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Community Health Care Ass'n of New York v. Mahon
See Oneida County, N.Y. v. Oneida Indian Nation of New York State, 470 U.S. 226, 105 S.Ct. 1245, 1260-61 , 84 L.Ed.2d 169 , reh’g denied, 471 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 2173 , 85 L.Ed.2d 491 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Golden Hill Paugussett Tr. v. Seymour, No. Cv93 04 43 66s (Feb. 28, 1994)
See Oneida Indian Nation of New York v. Oneida, 434 F. Sup. 527 (1977), aff'd, 719 F.2d 525 (2d Cir. 1983), aff'd in relevant part, 470 U.S. 226 , 105 S.Ct. 1245 , 84 L.Ed.2d 169 , CT Page 2079 reh'g denied, 471 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 2173 , 85 L.Ed.2d 491 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Van Schouwen v. Connaught Corp.
See Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 470 U.S. 373 , 105 S.Ct. 1327 , 84 L.Ed.2d 274 (1985), reh’g denied, 471 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 2127 , 85 L.Ed.2d 491 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Pittman v. LaFontaine
See Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 470 U.S. 373, 381, 385 , 105 S.Ct. 1327, 1332, 1334 , 84 L.Ed.2d 274 reh’g denied, 471 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 2127 , 85 L.Ed.2d 491 (1985). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Blinco v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC
The filing of a notice of appeal is an event of jurisdictional significance — it confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.” Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 , 103 S.Ct, 400, 401 , 74 L.Ed.2d 225 (1982); see also Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 470 U.S. 373, 379 , 105 S.Ct. 1327, 1331 , 84 L.Ed.2d 274 (1985), reh’g denied, 471 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 2127 , 85 L.Ed.2d 491 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jack Blinco, Jr. v. Green Tree Servicing
The filing of a notice of appeal is an event of jurisdictional significance — it confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal." Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 , 103 S.Ct. 400, 401 , 74 L.Ed.2d 225 (1982); see also Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 470 U.S. 373, 379 , 105 S.Ct. 1327, 1331 , 84 L.Ed.2d 274 (1985), reh'g denied, 471 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 2127 , 85 L.Ed.2d 491 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nourbakhsh v. Gayden (In Re Nourbakhsh)
(2×)
The full faith and credit statute provides that state judicial proceedings "shall have the same full faith and credit in every court within the United States . . . as they have by law or usage in the courts of such State . . . from which they are taken." 28 U.S.C. § 1738 ; see also, Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, 470 U.S. 373, 380 , 105 S.Ct. 1327, 1331 , 84 L.Ed.2d 274 (1984), reh'g denied, 471 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 2127 , 85 L.Ed.2d 491 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Bencker
See, e.g., Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 470 U.S. 373, 377 , 105 S.Ct. 1327, 1330 , 84 L.Ed.2d 274 , reh'g denied, 471 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 2127 , 85 L.Ed.2d 491 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Republic Fabricators, Inc.
See also, Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 470 U.S. 373, 376, n. 1 , 105 S.Ct. 1327, 1329, n. 1 , 84 L.Ed.2d 274 , 278 n. 1 (1985), reh’g denied, 471 U.S. 1062 , 105 S.Ct. 2127 , 85 L.Ed.2d 491 (1985); Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 94, n. 5 , 101 S.Ct. 411 , 414 n. 5, 66 L.Ed.2d 308, 313, n. 5 (1980) (“The Restatement of Judgments now speaks of res judicata as ‘claim preclusion’ and collateral estoppel as ‘issue preclusion.’ Restatement (Second) of Judgments § 74 (TentDraft No. 3, Apr. 15, 1976).”).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Apex Oil Co. v. Dimauro
See, e.g., Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, 726 F.2d 1150, 1159 (7th Cir.1984) (en banc), rev’d on other gds., 470 U.S. 373 , 105 S.Ct. 1327 , 84 L.Ed.2d 274 , motion for clarification denied, petition for rehearing denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2127 , 85 L.Ed.2d 491 (1985); In re Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings in Petroleum Products Antitrust Litigation, 669 F.2d 620, 623 (10th Cir.1982); Kaufman v. Edelstein, 539 F.2d 811, 821 (2d Cir.1976); General Dynamics Corp. v. Selb Mfg.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Rowland
v.
Mad River Local School District, Montgomery County, Ohio Smith v. Jago, Superintendent, London Correctional Institution Gacy v. Illinois Attwell v. United States Postal Service Dingle v. Simpkins, Administrator of the Estate of Dingle Mullins v. Ohio, In re McDonald
v.
Mad River Local School District, Montgomery County, Ohio Smith v. Jago, Superintendent, London Correctional Institution Gacy v. Illinois Attwell v. United States Postal Service Dingle v. Simpkins, Administrator of the Estate of Dingle Mullins v. Ohio, In re McDonald
No. 84-532; No. 84-5548; No. 84-5811; No. 84-6082; No. 84-6173; No. 84-6273; No. 84-6315.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 22, 1985.
470 U. S. 1059; and
470 U. S. 1082. Petitions for rehearing denied.
Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.