green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
4.0 score
“agency must explain why the original reasons for adopting a rule or policy are no longer dispositive”
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
AFL-CIO v. McLaughlin
agency must explain why the original reasons for adopting a rule or policy are no longer dispositive
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, and Gary Jones, Revenue Officer of the Internal Revenue Service v. James E. Carter, United States of America, and Gary Jones, Revenue Officer of the Internal Revenue Service v. Shirley L. Carter
See Denison v. Commissioner, 751 F.2d 241, 242 (8th Cir.1984) (per curiam), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1069 , 105 S.Ct. 2149 , 85 L.Ed.2d 505 (1985); Hansen v. United States, 744 F.2d 658, 660 (8th Cir.1984) (per curiam); see also Coleman v. Commissioner, 791 F.2d 68, 72 (7th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carter
See Denison v. Commissioner, 751 F.2d 241, 242 (8th Cir.1984) (per curiam), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1069 , 105 S.Ct. 2149 , 85 L.Ed.2d 505 (1985); Hansen v. United States, 744 F.2d 658, 660 (8th Cir.1984) (per curiam); see also Coleman v. Commissioner, 791 F.2d 68, 72 (7th Cir.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Edward F. Farley and Thomas J. Finn v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
See Brae Corp. v. United States, 740 F.2d 1023, 1054 (D.C.Cir.1984) (“The legislative history of the Staggers Act ... indicates that Congress envisioned the Act, in general, and section 10505(a), in particular, as empowering the Commission to remove regulations and to introduce market factors into the rail industry.”), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1069 , 105 S.Ct. 2149 , 85 L.Ed.2d 505 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Logan
See, Commonwealth v. Petrino, 332 Pa.Superior Ct. 13, 480 A.2d 1160 (1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1069 , 105 S.Ct. 2149 , 85 L.Ed.2d 505 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jack O. Black v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America
See J.A. 57-58, 88. 20 We recently reiterated that “[t]he scope of review under the ‘arbitrary and capricious’ standard is narrow and a court is not to substitute its judgment for that of the agency.” Brae Corp. v. United States, 740 F.2d 1023, 1038 (D.C.Cir.1984) (quoting Motor Vehicles Manufacturers Ass’n v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 , 103 S.Ct. 2856, 2866-67 , 77 L.Ed.2d 443 (1983)), cert. denied — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2149 , 85 L.Ed.2d 505 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
AFL-CIO v. McLaughlin
See AT & T v. FCC, 832 F.2d 1285 , 1291 (D.C.Cir.1987); Western Union International v. FCC, 804 F.2d 1280 , 1291 (D.C.Cir.1986); see also Brae Corp. v. United States, 740 F.2d 1023, 1038 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1069 , 105 S.Ct. 2149 , 85 L.Ed.2d 505 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Petrino
v.
Pennsylvania
v.
Pennsylvania
No. 84-6466.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Apr 29, 1985.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia (1)
Super. Ct. Pa. Certiorari denied.