green
Positive treatment
3.4 score
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1983
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Conservation Law Foundation v. Federal Highway Administration
Subsequent decisions, however, have permitted the Secretary to reject projects “as imprudent for failure to fulfill the traffic needs of a highway project.” Coalition on Sensible Transp., Inc., et al., 642 F.Supp. at 598 ; but see Stop H-3 Ass’n v. Lewis, 740 F.2d 1442 , 1455 n. 21 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1108 , 105 S.Ct. 2344 , 85 L.Ed.2d 859 (1985).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Ronald Johnson v. Warden Lumpkin
But cf. Dillon v. Duckworth, 751 F.2d 895, 901 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2344 , 85 L.Ed.2d 859 (1985) (failure to explore possibility of plea bargaining where state wishes to use defendant’s testimony in accomplice's trial supports conclusion that defendant was denied effective assistance of counsel).
discussed
Cited "see"
The Laguna Greenbelt, Inc. v. United States Department Of Transportation
See Stop H-3 Ass'n v. Dole, 740 F.2d 1442 , 1461-62 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1108 , 105 S.Ct. 2344 , 85 L.Ed.2d 859 (1985). 31 While there are weaknesses in the EIS's analysis of growth-inducing impacts, 9 these weaknesses do not prevent us from concluding that the discussion of growth-inducing impacts in the EIS easily meets our "rule of reason." See Salmon River, 32 F.3d at 1356 .
cited
Cited "see"
Laguna Greenbelt, Inc. v. United States Department of Transportation
See Stop H-3 Ass’n v. Dole, 740 F.2d 1442, 1461-62 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1108 , 105 S.Ct. 2344 , 85 L.Ed.2d 859 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sierra Club v. United States Department of Transportation
See Stop H-3 Association v. Lewis, 538 F.Supp. 149 (D.Haw.1982), aff'd in part and rev’d in part, 740 F.2d 1442 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1108 , 105 S.Ct. 2344 , 85 L.Ed.2d 859 (1985). 2 In Stop H-3, a buffer zone of park land was created between an existing park and a proposed highway project.
cited
Cited "see"
Animal Defense Council v. Hodel
See Stop H-3 Association v. Dole, 740 F.2d 1442, 1461 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1108 , 105 S.Ct. 2344 , 85 L.Ed.2d 859 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Hirt v. Hodel
See Stop H-3 Association v. Dole, 740 F.2d 1442 , 1461 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1108 , 105 S.Ct. 2344 , 85 L.Ed.2d 859 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Parrish v. State
See Dillon v. State (1983), Ind., 454 N.E.2d 845, 848-49 , cert. denied 471 U.S. 1108 , 105 S.Ct. 2344 , 85 L.Ed.2d 859 .
cited
Cited "see"
Coalition on Sensible Transportation Inc. v. Dole
See Stop H-3 Ass’n v. Dole, 740 F.2d 1442 , 1452-53 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, Yamasaki v. Stop Ass’n, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2344 , 85 L.Ed.2d 859 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lake Hefner Open Space Alliance v. Dole
Compare with Stop H-3 Association v. Dole, 740 F.2d 1442 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, sub nom Yamasaki v. Stop H-3 Association, 471 U.S. 1108 , 105 S.Ct. 2344 , 85 L.Ed.2d 859 (1985) (case remanded for more information when "no build" alternative rejected but existing highways with unused capacity during peak traffic hours)
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lake Hefner Open Space Alliance v. Dole
Compare with Stop H-3 Association v. Dole, 740 F.2d 1442 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, sub nom Yamasaki v. Stop H-3 Association, 471 U.S. 1108 , 105 S.Ct. 2344 , 85 L.Ed.2d 859 (1985) (case remanded for more information when "no build” alternative rejected but existing highways with unused capacity during peak traffic hours).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Wade v. Dole
Id. at 415-17 , 91 S.Ct. at 823-24 ; see also Stop H-3 Assoc, v. Dole, 740 F.2d 1442 , 1449 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 2344 , 85 L.Ed.2d 859 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Duckworth, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison
v.
Dillon
v.
Dillon
No. 84-1540.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 13, 1985.
Cited by 2 opinions | Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari denied.