green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
6.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1989 ·
…plaintiffs had the burden of proving that was not entitled to separate recognition.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 30 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
Grove v. Pfister
But see Aguilar v. County of Los Angeles, 751 F.2d 1089 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985) (where under California state law collateral estoppel may preclude minor from relitigating issue of negligence if his parents were unsuccessful in a federal diversity action, minor required to be joined in his parent’s action for recovery of pre-majority medical expenses); Lopez v. Martin Luther King, Jr. Hosp., 97 F.R.D. 24 (C.D.Cal.1983) (same).
discussed
Cited "but see"
The Export Group Emilio Figueroa Jack Andrews v. Reef Industries, Inc., and Mexican Coffee Institute
But see Letelier v. Republic of Chile, 748 F.2d 790, 795 (2d Cir.1984) (construing statutory language of two clauses and finding that “[t]his language suggests that the commercial activity exception to jurisdictional immunity under (2) and the tort exception under (5) are mutually exclusive”), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985); Gilson v. Republic of Ireland, 682 F.2d 1022 , 1028 n. 27 (D.C.Cir.1982) (stating as dictum that the exceptions in section 1605(a)(5)(B) do not limit section 1605(a)(2)).
discussed
Cited "but see"
Garay v. Overholtzer
But see Aguilar v. County of Los Angeles, 751 F.2d 1089 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985) (where under California state law collateral estoppel may preclude minor from relitigating issue of negligence if his parents were unsuccessful in a federal diversity action, minor required to be joined in his parent’s action for recovery of pre-majority medical expenses); Lopez v. Martin Luther King, Jr. Hosp., 97 F.R.D. 24 (C.D.Cal.1983) (same).
cited
Cited "but see"
Fisher v. Steelville Community Banc-shares, Inc.
But see, Martin v. Kilgore First Bancorp, Inc., 747 F.2d 1024 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985).
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hester International Corp. v. The Federal Republic of Nigeria v. Jack M. Koonce, Individually and D/B/A Koonce Engineering Service, Movant-Appellant. Hester International Corp. v. The Federal Republic of Nigeria, National Grains Production Co., Limited, a Company Incorporated in Nigeria, and the Government of Cross River State of Nigeria
plaintiffs had the burden of proving that was not entitled to separate recognition.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hester International Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria
plaintiffs had the burden of proving that was not entitled to separate recognition.
cited
Cited "see"
Jet, Inc. v. Sewage Aeration Systems
See Marx v. Centran Corp., 747 F.2d 1536, 1550 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Thornton v. Mercantile Stores Co., Inc.
See Marx v. Centran Corp., 747 F.2d 1536, 1552 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985); Wright v. Schock, 742 F.2d 541, 543-44 (9th Cir.1984); Vervaecke v. Chiles, Heider & Co., 578 F.2d 713, 719-20 (8th Cir.1978); Crowley v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 570 F.2d 877, 879 (10th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Jibson v. Michigan Education Association-Nea
See Marx v. Centran Corp, 747 F.2d 1536, 1552 (6th Cir.1984) (district court not required to determine whether complaint could be properly maintained as class action before ruling on merits of case), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985); Gwirtz, 887 F.2d at 683 (agreeing with district court that union provided constitutionally sufficient notice, finding that district court did not err in refusing to rule on plaintiffs' motion for class certification, and, given affirmance of district court's substantive ruling, declining to order district court to nonetheless ce…
discussed
Cited "see"
Jibson v. Michigan Education Ass'n-NEA
See Marx v. Centran Corp, 747 F.2d 1536, 1552 (6th Cir.1984) (district court not required to determine whether complaint could be properly maintained as class action before ruling on merits of case), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985); Gwirtz, 887 F.2d at 683 (agreeing with district court that union provided constitutionally sufficient notice, finding that district court did not err in refusing to rule on plaintiffs’ motion for class certification, and, given affir-mance of district court’s substantive ruling, declining to order district court to nonethele…
discussed
Cited "see"
Brian Gwartz, M.D. v. Jefferson Memorial Hospital Association
See Aguilar v. Los Angeles County, 751 F.2d 1089, 1098 (9th Cir.) (holding that “‘interest’ under Rule 19 should be determined from a practical ... perspective”), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Texaco Inc. v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co.
See Marx v. Centran Corp., 747 F.2d 1536, 1552 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985); Wright v. Schock, 742 F.2d 541, 543-44 (9th Cir.1984); Vervaecke v. Chiles, Heider & Co., 578 F.2d 713, 719-20 (8th Cir.1978); Crowley v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 570 F.2d 877, 879 (10th Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
David Shapiro v. The Republic of Bolivia, the Bolivian Air Force and the Central Bank of Bolivia
See Morel de Letelier v. Republic of Chile, 748 F.2d 790, 793 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Weltover, Inc. v. Republic of Argentina
See Letelier v. Republic of Chile, 748 F.2d 790, 793 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985); see also Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp., 488 U.S. 428 , 109 S.Ct. 683 , 102 L.Ed.2d 818 (1989) (holding that the FSIA provides the sole basis for obtaining jurisdiction over a foreign state in federal court).
discussed
Cited "see"
Western Maryland Railway Company v. Harbor Insurance Company
See Aguilar v. Los Angeles County, 751 F.2d 1089, 1092 (9th Cir.) (de novo review of rule 19(a)(2)(i) determination), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985); cf. Travelers Indem.
cited
Cited "see"
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Dingwell
See Aguilar v. Los Angeles County, 751 F.2d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985); Hansen v. People’s Bank, 594 F.2d 1149, 1153 (7th Cir.1979).
cited
Cited "see"
The Travelers Indemnity Company v. Richard A. Dingwell, D/B/A McKin Company, (Two Cases). Appeal of Chicago Insurance Company, the Travelers Indemnity Company v. Richard A. Dingwell, D/B/A McKin Company, Appeal of American Policyholders Insurance Company, Amoco Oil Company v. Richard A. Dingwell, D/B/A McKin Company, (Three Cases). Appeal of Chicago Insurance Company, Intervenor. Appeal of the Travelers Indemnity Company, Intervenors. Appeal of American Policyholders Insurance Company, Intervenor
See Aguilar v. Los Angeles County, 751 F.2d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985); Hansen v. People's Bank, 594 F.2d 1149, 1153 (7th Cir.1979).
discussed
Cited "see"
Communications Systems, Inc. v. City of Danville, Kentucky Rv Cablevision, Inc. George Cunningham Mark Dexter Roy Arnold and John Bowling
See Marx v. Centran Corp., 747 F.2d 1536 (6th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985) (no abuse of discretion in denying amendment to add new claims that lack substantial merit).
discussed
Cited "see"
Hester International Corp. v. Federal Republic of Nigeria
See De Letelier v. The Republic of Chile, 748 F.2d 790, 793 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985); Maritime International Nominees Establishment v. The Republic of Guinea, 693 F.2d 1094, 1099 (D.C.Cir.1982) (“absence of immunity is a condition to the presence of subject matter jurisdiction”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 815 , 104 S.Ct. 71 , 78 L.Ed.2d 84 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joseph Wayne Floyd v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services
See Marx v. Centran Corp., 747 F.2d 1536, 1552 (6th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985); Wright v. Schock, 742 F.2d 541, 543-44 (9th Cir.1984); *535 Vervaecke v. Chiles, Heider & Co., 578 F.2d 713, 719-20 (8th Cir.1978); Crowley v. Montgomery Ward & Co., 570 F.2d 877, 879 (10th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gianakas v. Siensa
Accord Marx v. Centran Corp., 747 F.2d 1536, 1549-50 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985) (holding no private right of action under BHCA); ORBANCO, Inc. v. Security Bank of Oregon, 371 F.Supp. 125, 129 (D.Ore.1974).
cited
Cited "see"
Jose Olvera Chairez v. United States Immigration and Naturalization Service William Duckham Ronald Dowdy Robert McNamara and Jerald D. Jondall
See Marx v. Centran Corp., 747 F.2d 1536, 1544-45 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Magnus Electronics, Inc. v. Argentine Republic
See Letelier v. Republic of Chile, 748 F.2d 790, 793-95 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985) (refusing to ignore the separate existence of a government-owned airline on an unsubstantiated “alter ego” basis); and see this Court’s opinions rejecting wholly unsupported “alter ego” allegations, B.R.M.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
WMW MacHinery, Inc. v. Werkzeugmaschinenhandel GmbH IM Aufbau
See also De Letelier v. Republic of Chile, 748 F.2d 790, 797 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985) (an activity is “commercial” if it is “of a type an individual would customarily carry on for profit”).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Linton v. Airbus Industrie
See, e.g., DeLetelier v. Republic of Chile, 748 F.2d 790, 793 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bryks v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp.
See also De Letelier v. Republic of Chile, 748 F.2d 790, 797 (2d Cir.1984) (an activity is “commercial” under the FSIA if it “is of a type an individual would customarily carry on for profit”), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kirchgessner v. Wilentz
Id. (citations omitted); see also Marx v. Centran Corp., 747 F.2d 1536, 1552 (6th Cir.1984) (“It has never been doubted that a complaint asserting a class action could be dismissed on the merits before determining whether the suit could be maintained as a class action.”), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985); Wright v. Schock, 742 F.2d 541, 543-44 (9th Cir.1984) (holding that district court has discretion, under appropriate circumstances, to rule on summary judgment motion before addressing pending class certification motion).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Clay v. Yates
See, e.g., Marx v. Centran Corp., 747 F.2d 1536, 1551 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Filus v. Lot Polish Airlines
See First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Commercio Exterior de Cuba (Bancec), 462 U.S. 611, 626-27 , 103 S.Ct. 2591, 2599-2600 , 77 L.Ed.2d 46 (1983) (“[Gjovernment instrumentalities established as juridical entitles, distinct and independent from their sovereign should normally be treated as such.”); see also DeLetelier v. Republic of Chile, 748 F.2d 790 , 794 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985) (since “[tjhere was no finding that [the National Airline’s] separate status was established to shield its owners from liability for their …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Filus v. Lot Polish Airlines
See First National City Bank v. Banco Para El Commercio Exterior de Cuba (Bancec), 462 U.S. 611, 626-27 , 103 S.Ct. 2591, 2599-2600 , 77 L.Ed.2d 46 (1983) ("[G]overnment instrumentalities established as juridical entitles distinct and independent from their sovereign should normally be treated as such."); see also DeLetelier v. Republic of Chile, 748 F.2d 790 , 794 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 471 U.S. 1125 , 105 S.Ct. 2656 , 86 L.Ed.2d 273 (1985) (since "[t]here was no finding that [the National Airline's] separate status was established to shield its owners from liability for their torts or …
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Aguilar et ux.
v.
County of Los Angeles
v.
County of Los Angeles
No. 84-1569.
Supreme Court of the United States.
May 28, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: Fifth Circuit (2)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.