green
Positive treatment
9.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 41 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Leonard Wayne Kragness, A/K/A Sonny Kragness, United States of America v. Dennis Lloyd Deters, United States of America v. Peter Bernhard Caspersen, United States of America v. Jerald Arthur Holbrook, United States of America v. Ronald Francis Prescott
See United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1038-39 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 (1982); but see United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1360-61 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985). 20 66 Any error involved in charging 10(a) and 10(b) as separate predicate acts is harmless as to Kragness because he was convicted on Count XI, which charged a substantive offense identical to Count II's predicate act 10(d).
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Kragness
See United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1038-39 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1136 , 102 S.Ct. 2965 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1354 (1982); but see United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1360-61 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985). 20 Any error involved in charging 10(a) and 10(b) as separate predicate acts is harmless as to Kragness because he was convicted on Count XI, which charged a substantive offense identical to Count II's predicate act 10(d).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Lenarz
(2×)
See United States v. Costanzo, 740 F.2d 251, 257 (3d Cir. 1984) (sixth amendment violation follows from finding of prejudice), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S. Ct. 3477 , 87 L.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Andre N. Moore, United States of America v. Larry Jones
See United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231, 1240 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Poulton v. State
See United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985) and United States v. Caldwell, 954 F.2d 496, 500 (8th Cir.1992), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 819 , 113 S.Ct. 65 , 121 L.Ed.2d 32 (1992). 3 In the present case, defense counsel moved for the exclusion of the two statements during a motion in limine hearing.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lin Lyn Trading, Ltd.
See U.S. v. Costanzo, 740 F.2d 251, 254 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); U.S. v. Levy, 577 F.2d 200 , 210 (3d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Shillinger v. Haworth
See United States v. Costanzo, 740 F.2d 251, 254 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); United States v. Levy, 577 F.2d 200, 210 (3d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
Shillinger v. Haworth
See United States v. Costanzo, 740 F.2d 251, 254 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); United States v. Levy, 577 F.2d 200, 210 (3d Cir.1978).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Christopher Fontenot
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1349 (11th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 & 1021, 105 S.Ct. 3477 & 3488, 87 L.Ed.2d 613 , 622 (1985). 3 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Noble C. Beasley, Andre Bruce White, Stephanie Nodd, Richard Stanberry
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1354 (11th Cir.1984) ("prosecutorial appeals for the jury to act as the conscience of the community’ are not impermissible, unless calculated to inflame”), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); see also United States v. Solivan, 937 F.2d 1146, 1153 (6th Cir.1991) ("defendant’s constitutional right to a fair trial was violated because the appeal to the community conscience in the context of the War on Drugs prejudicially impacted on her"). 25 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Glen Butz Danner L. Boone
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1346-47 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); United States v. McNulty, 729 F.2d 1243, 1264-65 (10th Cir.1983) (en banc); United States v. Nelligan, 573 F.2d 251, 254 (5th Cir.1978); United States v. Marion, 535 F.2d 697, 702 (2d Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
Snell v. Lockhart
See generally, United States v. Ellison, 793 F.2d 942 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 937 , 107 S.Ct. 415 , 93 L.Ed.2d 366 (1986) and United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lamar Harris, A/K/A Cheese, United States of America v. Gary Wyche, A/K/A Gary Gunter, Drago, United States of America v. Donald Johnson, A/K/A Danny, United States of America v. Michael Palmer, A/K/A Knot, Tony, James, United States of America v. Richard A. Smith, A/K/A Rich, Mo, Richmo
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1365 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); cf. Peretz v. United States, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 2661, 2669 , 115 L.Ed.2d 808 (1991) (stating that the basic rights of criminal defendants are waivable) 3 Under Blockburger v. United States, 284 U.S. 299 , 52 S.Ct. 180 , 76 L.Ed. 306 (1932), "[t]he applicable rule is that where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whethe…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Harris
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1365 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); cf. Peretz v. United States, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2661, 2669 , 115 L.Ed.2d 808 (1991) (stating that the basic rights of criminal defendants are waivable). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Hustwit
McCluskey, 6 U.S.C.M.A. at 551 n. 1, 20 C.M.R. at 267 n. 1; see United States v. Costanzo, 625 F.2d 465 (3d Cir. 1980) cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985). 1 That an at tomey violates his instructions to limit the scope of his representation and may be disciplined for such violation does not affect the validity of the attorney-client relationship and the confidential nature of any disclosures arising therefrom.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Roman Young, Zed Myers Bennett, Steven Alan Carver
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Juan Delgado, Dagoberto Silva, Henry Escobar
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1359 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. George M. Khoury
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1344 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 3477, 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Prigge
See United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231, 1240 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985) (failure to give Miranda rights to defendants prior to their initial responses to questions of law enforcement officers was not plain error).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Eric John Thompson, United States of America v. Tammy Ann Leavoy
FED.R.EVID. 103; see U.S. v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231 , 1240 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3478 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); U.S. v. Vitale, 728 F.2d 1090, 1092 (8th Cir.1984); U.S. v. Wagoner, 713 F.2d 1371, 1376 (8th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Building Material and Dump Truck Drivers, Local 420 and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Plaintiffs v. Oliver Traweek and Gene McFadden v. Gene True Edgar Smith Richard Martino Pete Gallegos Leo Pittman Arthur Webb and Clyde Craig, Third-Party-Defendants-Appellants. Building Material and Dump Truck Drivers, Local 420, and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. Richard Martino Edgar Smith and Gene True, and Oliver Traweek and Gene McFadden Defendants-Counterclaim-Third-Party
See NLRB v. Carpenters Local Union 35, 739 F.2d 479 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); Adams-Lundy v. Association of Professional Flight Attendants, 792 F.2d 1368, 1372 (5th Cir.1986); Lux v. Blackman, 546 F.2d 713 (7th Cir.1976) (union officers may be summarily removed regardless of the nonregularity of removal without violation of Sec. 411). 40 For instance, Sec. 411 was not violated by the secret executive board meeting to which Traweek and McFadden were not invited because it did not affect their membership rights.
discussed
Cited "see"
Building Material & Dump Truck Drivers, Local 420 v. Traweek
See NLRB v. Carpenters Local Union 35, 739 F.2d 479 (9th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); Adams-Lundy v. Association of Professional Flight Attendants, 792 F.2d 1368, 1372 (5th Cir.1986); Lux v. Blackman, 546 F.2d 713 (7th Cir.1976) (union officers may be summarily removed regardless of the nonregu-larity of removal without violation of § 411).
cited
Cited "see"
Shaktman v. State
Accord United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335 , 1345 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, Hobson v. United States, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); Hudson, 368 So.2d at 902 .
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. General Teamsters Local No. 439, Paul McMillen Intervenor
See NLRB v. Carpenters Local Union No. 35, 739 F.2d 479, 481-82 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Frieda M. Grosshans
See United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231, 1242-43 (8th Cir.1984) (holding that the right to counsel does not imply the right to counsel who shares beliefs about the tax laws), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Marion Van Horn, Scott Bertelsen, Gary Balough, Dennis Kay, Robert Van Horn, Dennis Cason, Thomas Sikes, John Crosby Bertelsen, Joseph William Campbell, United States of America v. William Joseph Harvey, A/K/A Billy
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1342-43 (11th Cir.1984) (marijuana offenses may be predicate acts for RICO charge), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 3477, 3488, 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); United States v. Pepe, 747 F.2d 632, 659-60 (11th Cir.1984) (RICO conspiracy requires that defendant agree to commit the two predicate acts and be aware that others have done so); United States v. Hewes, 729 F.2d 1302, 1310-11 (11th Cir.1984) (definition of RICO enterprise), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 790 , 83 L.Ed.2d 783 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Van Horn
See United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1342-43 (11th Cir. 1984) (marijuana offenses may be predicate acts for RICO charge), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 3477, 3488, 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); United States v. Pepe, 747 F.2d 632, 659-60 (11th Cir.1984) (RICO conspiracy requires that defendant agree to commit the two predicate acts and be aware that others have done so); United States v. Hewes, 729 F.2d 1302, 1310-11 (11th Cir.1984) (definition of RICO enterprise), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 105 S.Ct. 790 , 83 L.Ed.2d 783 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Mark Lewis Singer
(2×)
See United States v. Costanzo, 740 F.2d 251, 254-55 (3d Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985) (district court’s finding that no prejudice would flow from an alleged sixth amendment violation is reviewable under the clearly erroneous standard).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Grant
See, e.g., United States v. Costanzo, 740 F.2d 251 (3d Cir.1984) (failure to be admitted pro hac vice), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); State v. White, 101 N.M. 310, 313-14 , 681 P.2d 736, 739-40 (1984) (failure of licensed out of state attorney to appear with in-state counsel, as per local rule); Wilson v. People, 652 P.2d 595 (Colo.1982) (failure to take the formal oath for membership in the bar), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1218 , 103 S.Ct. 1221 , 75 L.Ed.2d 457 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Commonwealth v. Johnson
See, e.g., United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231, 1240 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); United *824 States v. King, 724 F.2d 253, 256 (1st Cir.1984); United States v. Nooks, 446 F.2d 1283, 1288 (5th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 299 , 30 L.Ed.2d 261 (1971); People v. Pearson, 150 Cal.App.2d 811, 815-19 , 311 P.2d 142, 145-46 (1957); People v. Klimek, 101 Ill.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ward
See also United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335 , reh’g denied 749 F.2d 733 , cert. denied, Hobson v. United States, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1984) (“knowledge” element of conspiracy refers to knowledge element of conspiracy).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Steven Curtis Waupekenay
See, e.g., United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231, 1240 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 3478, 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); United States v. King, 724 F.2d 253, 256 (1st Cir.1984); United States v. Nooks, 446 F.2d 1283, 1288 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 404 U.S. 945 , 92 S.Ct. 299 , 30 L.Ed.2d 261 (1971); People v. Pearson, 150 Cal.App.2d 811, 815-19 , 311 P.2d 142, 145-46 (1957); People v. Kli-mek, 101 Ill.App.3d 1, 6 , 56 Ill.Dec. 403, 408 , 427 N.E.2d 598 /603 (1981); Commonwealth v. Saia, 372 Mass. 53 , 360 N.E.2d 329, 332 (1977); State v. Bale, 267 N.W.2d 730, 732-33 (M…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jorge Enrique Gonzalez, A/K/A George, Maurice Roundy, Michael Timothy Sweeton
See also United States v. Bascaro, 142 F.2d 1335 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985) (“Best buyers’ ” close working relationship with drug ring brought them within RICO enterprise). 18 With these contentions of Gonzalez removed, the evidence presented to the jury was clearly sufficient to show his agreement on the overall objective of the Le-Quire enterprise.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Esposito
See, e.g., United States v. Udey, 748 F.2d 1231, 1237-38 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3477 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); United States v. Slocum, 695 F.2d 650, 656-57 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1015 , 103 S.Ct. 1260 , 75 L.Ed.2d 487 (1983); United States v. Pearson, 667 F.2d 12, 15 (11th Cir.1982); United States v. Powell, 632 F.2d 754, 756-58 (9th Cir.1980).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Rudolph T. Covos
Some courts thus have held that “federal law prohibits introduction of evidence obtained by state agents proceeding under section 2516(2) where state wiretap order requirements are violated.” United States v. McNulty, 729 F.2d 1243, 1264 (10th Cir.1984) (en banc); see also United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1347 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); United States v. Marion, 535 F.2d 697, 702 (2d Cir.1976).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Thomas Creighton Shrader v. State Supreme Court for the State of West Virginia Through Each of the Five Justices
See also Ganey v. Barefoot, 749 F.2d 1124, 1127 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 53 U.S.L.W. 3882 (June 17, 1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Charles M. Anderson v. Thomas J. Middleton Henry C. MacKall
See also Ganey v. Barefoot, 749 F.2d 1124, 1127 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 53 U.S.L.W. 3882 (June 17, 1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Feola
See, e.g., United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1347 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1017 , 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1984); United States v. Barker, 623 F.Supp. 823, 847 (D.Colo.1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Richard Steven Maulick v. Henrico County (J & D Court) Hanover County (J & D Court) Venice (Maulick) Fredricks
See also Ganey v. Barefoot, 749 F.2d 1124, 1127 (4th Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 53 U.S.L.W. 3882 (June 17, 1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Marriott
See, e.g., United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1345-46 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, Hobson v. United States, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 3476, 3477, 3488 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613, 622 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
David Peek v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center
See United States v. Crutcher, 405 F.2d 239, 242-43 (2d Cir.1968) (discussing Lewis v. United States, 146 U.S. 370 , 13 S.Ct. 136 , 36 L.Ed. 1011 (1892)), cert. denied, 394 U.S. 908 , 89 S.Ct. 1018 , 22 L.Ed.2d 219 (1969); see also United States v. Bascaro, 742 F.2d 1335, 1349 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 3476 , 87 L.Ed.2d 613 (1985); United States v. Crews, 695 F.2d 519 (11th Cir.1983) (per curiam).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Hobson
v.
United States and Villanueva v. United States
v.
United States and Villanueva v. United States
No. 84-1148; No. 84-1403.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 17, 1985.
Cited by 30 opinions | Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.