green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
5.7 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1994 ·
…while it may be conceded that parties to litigation have a constitutionally protected right to disseminate information obtained by them through the discovery process absent a valid protective order, it does not follow that they can be compelled to disseminate such information.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jepson, Incorporated and Ko Shin Electric and MacHinery Company, Limited v. Makita Electric Works, Limited, Makita Usa, Incorporated and Makita Corporation of America, and William A. Zeitler, Douglas J. Colton and Verner, Liipfert, Bernhard, McPherson & Hand v. Black & Decker, Incorporated
while it may be conceded that parties to litigation have a constitutionally protected right to disseminate information obtained by them through the discovery process absent a valid protective order, it does not follow that they can be compelled to disseminate such information.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Jepson, Inc. v. Makita Electric Works, Ltd.
while it may be conceded that parties to litigation have a constitutionally protected right to disseminate information obtained by them through the discovery process absent a valid protective order, it does not follow that they can be compelled to disseminate such information.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Bennett v. State
We again certify the following question as one of great public importance: HAS THE OBJECTIVE ENTRAPMENT TEST SET FORTH IN CRUZ V STATE, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.1985), cert, denied, 473 U.S. 905 , 105, S.Ct. 3527, 87 L.Ed. 2d 652 (1985), BEEN ABOLISHED BY THE ENACTMENT OF SECTION 777.201, FLORIDA STATUTES (1987)?
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Cerrito
See Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.), cert, denied, 473 U.S. 905 , 105 S.Ct. 3527 , 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Gonzalez v. State
See Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905 , 105 S.Ct. 3527 , 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mendoza v. State
See Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 , (Fla.) cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905 , 105 S.Ct. 3527 , 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985); Odom v. State, 403 So.2d 936 (Fla.1981); Crum v. State, 398 So.2d 810 (Fla.1981); compare Rodriguez v. State, 462 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). § 924.33, Florida Statutes (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Angeles v. District Director, Immigration & Naturalization Service
See District 17, District 29, Local Union 7113, and Local Union 6023, United Mine Workers of America v. Allied Corp., 735 F.2d 121, 129 (4th Cir. 1984), different result reached on other grounds, 765 F.2d 412 (4th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905 , 105 S.Ct. 3527 , 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Garcia
See Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla. 1985), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905 , 105 S.Ct. 3527 , 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Reyes
See Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 3527 , 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Clarence E. Lockhart v. United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust Paul R. Dean Michael H. Holland Marty D. Hudson Elliott A. Segal, Trustees
We have previously recognized that ”[i]t is unclear whether the 'abuse of discretion’ standard adopted in [Firestone ] is synonymous with the 'arbitrary and capricious’ standard previously used by the Fourth Circuit and most other courts." Richards v. United Mine Workers Health & Retirement Fund, 895 F.2d 133 , 135 (4th Cir.1990); see also District 17, District 29, Local Union 7113 v. Allied Corp., 765 F.2d 412, 416-17 (4th Cir.) (en banc) (applying pre-Firestone arbitrary and capricious standard of review), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905 , 105 S.Ct. 3527 , 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aguinaga v. United Food & Commercial Workers International Union
See e.g., District 17 v. Allied Corp., 765 F.2d 412, 419-20 (4th Cir.) (en banc) (injunction issued requiring employer that breached collective bargaining agreement to continue to pay retired miners benefits), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905 , 105 S.Ct. 3527 , 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985); Richardson v. Communications Workers of America, 443 F.2d 974 (8th Cir.1971) (wrongfully discharged employee entitled to back pay beyond expiration date of collective bargaining agreement); Local 127, United Shoe Workers v. Brooks Shoe Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Aguinaga v. United Food And Commercial Workers
See e.g., District 17 v. Allied Corp., 765 F.2d 412, 419-20 (4th Cir.) (en banc) (injunction issued requiring employer that breached collective bargaining agreement to continue to pay retired miners benefits), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905 , 105 S.Ct. 3527 , 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985); Richardson v. Communications Workers of America, 443 F.2d 974 (8th Cir.1971) (wrongfully discharged employee entitled to back pay beyond expiration date of collective bargaining agreement); Local 127, United Shoe Workers v. Brooks Shoe Mfg.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Johnson
(2×)
See, e.g., State v. Molnar, 81 N.J. 475, 486 , 410 A.2d 37 (1980) (Code of Criminal Justice represents intermediate position between the subjective and objective views on entrapment); see also Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516, 521 (Fla.) (“subjective and objective entrapment doctrines can coexist”), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905 , 105 S.Ct. 3527 , 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985); Baird v. State, 440 N.E.2d 1143, 1145-46 (Ind.Ct.App.1982) (explaining dual nature of Indiana’s statutory entrapment defense); People v. Isaacson, 44 N.Y.2d 511 , 406 N.Y.S.2d 714 , 378 N.E.2d 78 (1978) (creating an entrapment t…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
LTV Steel Co. v. United Mine Workers of America (In re Chateaugay Corp.)
The court, after carefully examining the language of the Wage Agreements and relevant case law, held that the company’s "obligation to provide health benefits ... to its retired ... coal miners under the 1978 and 1981 Wage Agreements does not extend beyond the expiration of those Agreements.” Id. at 592 ; see also District 17, Dist. 29, Local Union 7113, and Local Union 6023, United Mine Workers of America v. Allied Corp., 765 F.2d 412 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905 , 105 S.Ct. 3527 , 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Chateaugay Corporation
The court, after carefully examining the language of the Wage Agreements and relevant case law, held that the company's "obligation to provide health benefits ... to its retired ... coal miners under the 1978 and 1981 Wage Agreements does not extend beyond the expiration of those Agreements." Id. at 592 ; see also District 17, Dist. 29, Local Union 7113, and Local Union 6023, United Mine Workers of America v. Allied Corp., 765 F.2d 412 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905 , 105 S.Ct. 3527 , 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985). 34 In 1987, building on Royal Coal I, the Fourth Circuit again confronted the i…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Public Citizen v. Liggett Group, Inc.
See Seattle Times Co. v. Rhinehart, 467 U.S. 20, 31-36 , 104 S.Ct. 2199, 2206-09 , 81 L.Ed.2d 17 (1984); see also Oklahoma Hospital Ass’n v. Oklahoma Publishing Co., 748 F.2d 1421, 1424 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905 , 105 S.Ct. 3528 , 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spivey v. State
Compare with Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516 (Fla. 1985) (entrapment defense available under circumstances where the defendant took paper money protruding from the pocket of a police decoy who pretended to be drunk), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 905 , 105 S.Ct. 3527 , 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lynn Dale Bogart, Edward Elbert Wingender, Teodaro Risquez, Defendants
See, e.g., Cruz v. State, 465 So.2d 516, 520-21 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct. 3527 , 87 L.Ed.2d 652 (1985); State v. Molnar, 81 N.J. 475, 484 , 410 A.2d 37, 41 (1980). 2 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Canale
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 84-1760.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 1, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: Seventh Circuit (2)
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.