green
Positive treatment
4.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Todd Baker And Theresa Baker v. Pennymac Loan Services
See In Re Marriage of Konzen, 103 Wn.2d 470, 473-74 , 693 P.2d 97 , cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S. Ct. 3530 , 87 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Poling
See Macurdy v. Sikov & Love, P.A., 894 F.2d 818, 820 (6th Cir.1990) (citing Gries Sports Enterprises v. Modell, 15 Ohio St.3d 284 , 473 N.E.2d 807, 810 (1984), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Philips Credit Corp. v. Regent Health Group, Inc.
“Because a negligent promissory misrepresentation is not a misrepresentation of fact, a special relationship must exist between the parties in order for a promissory misrepresentation to give rise to a justiciable claim.” Frutico, 833 F.Supp. at 300 ; see Durante Bros. & Sons, Inc. v. Flushing Nat’l Bank, 755 F.2d 239, 252-53 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cumis Insurance Society, Inc. v. Citibank
See Durante Bros, and Sons, Inc. v. Flushing Nat’l Bank, 755 F.2d 239, 252 (2d Cir.) (“An ordinary creditor-debtor relationship between bank and customer does not create such a duty of care.”), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985); Estate of T.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Houbigant, Inc.
See Durante Bros. & Sons, Inc. v. Flushing National Bank, 755 F.2d 239, 251 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985); Ahmed v. National Bank of Pakistan, 572 F.Supp. 550, 554-55 (S.D.N.Y.1983); ABKCO Industries, Inc. v. Lennon, 52 A.D.2d 435 , 384 N.Y.S.2d 781, 784 (N.Y.App.Div.1976).
cited
Cited "see"
Carper v. DeLand
See Smith v. Smythe-Cramer Co., 754 F.2d 180, 184 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Pendleton Enterprises, Inc. v. Iams Co.
See Smith v. Smythe-Cramer Co., 754 F.2d 180, 184 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Frutico, S.A. de C.V. v. Bankers Trust Co.
See Durante Bros. & Sons, Inc. v. Flushing Nat’l Bank, 755 F.2d 239, 252-53 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Krstich v. United Services Automobile Ass'n
See Gries Sports Enterprises, Inc. v. Modell, 15 Ohio St.3d 284, 288 , 473 N.E.2d 807 (1984) cert. denied 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985). 2 Thus, under both tests, the principles of § 6 factor into resolution of the choice of law.
discussed
Cited "see"
Fasolino Foods Co. v. Banca Nazionale Del Lavoro
See Durante Bros. & Sons v. Flushing Nat’l Bank, 755 F.2d 239, 252 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985); Interocean Shipping *1020 Co. v. National Shipping & Trading Corp., 462 F.2d 673, 676 (2d Cir.1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon
See Durante Bros. & Sons v. Flushing Nat'l Bank, 755 F.2d 239, 248 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985); Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., 719 F.2d 5, 17 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1025 , 104 S.Ct. 1280 , 79 L.Ed.2d 684 (1984); Von Bulow by Auersperg v. Von Bulow, 634 F.Supp. 1284, 1304 (S.D.N.Y.1986) Few cases, however, specifically compare the elements of a civil RICO claim with any common law cause of action.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rivieccio
See Durante Brothers & Sons, Inc. v. Flushing National Bank, 755 F.2d 239, 251 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wilcox v. First Interstate Bank of Oregon, N.A.
See Durante Bros. & Sons v. Flushing Nat'l Bank, 755 F.2d 239, 248 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985); Moss v. Morgan Stanley Inc., 719 F.2d 5, 17 (2d Cir.1983), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1025 , 104 S.Ct. 1280 , 79 L.Ed.2d 684 (1984); Von Bulow by Auersperg v. Von Bulow, 634 F.Supp. 1284, 1304 (S.D.N.Y.1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Getz v. Penthouse International, Ltd.
See Durante Brothers and Sons, Inc. v. Flushing National Bank, 755 F.2d 239, 244 , cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985); see also Board of Regents v. Tomanio, 446 U.S. 478, 485 , 100 S.Ct. 1790, 1795 , 64 L.Ed.2d 440 (1980); Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, 421 U.S. 454, 462 , 95 S.Ct. 1716, 1721 , 44 L.Ed.2d 295 (1975). 5 Plaintiff argues that because his RICO claim is predicated on mail and telephone fraud, the Court should apply the six-year New York statute of limitations governing actions based on fraud.
cited
Cited "see"
Davis v. Smith
Id.; see Durante Bros, and Sons, Inc. v. Flushing National Bank, 755 F.2d 239 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985). 13 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Vasile v. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc.
Transcript Corp. v. Ziff Communications Co., 225 A.D.2d 322 , 638 N.Y.S.2d 640, 641 (1st Dep’t 1996); see also Durante Bros, and Sons, Inc. v. Flushing Nat’l Bank, 755 F.2d 239, 251 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985); Greystone Partnerships Group, Inc. v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V., 815 F.Supp. 745, 759 (S.D.N.Y.1993).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peter Shann v. John S. Dunk, John S. Dunk v. Peter Shann
See also Durante Bros. & Sons, Inc. v. Flushing Nat’l Bank, 755 F.2d 239, 252 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985); Cobble Hill Nursing Home, Inc. v. Henry & Warren Corp., 74 N.Y.2d 475, 482 , 548 N.E.2d 203, 206 , 548 N.Y.S.2d 920, 923 (1989), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 816 , 111 S.Ct. 58 , 112 L.Ed.2d 33 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sudul v. Computer Outsourcing Services, Inc.
“A party ‘who would repudiate a contract procured by duress, must act promptly, or he will be deemed to have elected to affirm it.’ ” Bank Leumi Trust Co. of New York v. D’Evori Int’l, Inc., 163 A.D.2d 26, 30 , 558 N.Y.S.2d 909, 914 (1st Dep’t 1990) *1047 (quoting Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Solow, 63 A.D.2d 611, 612 , 405 N.Y.S.2d 80, 82 (1st Dep’t 1978)); see also Durante Bros. and Sons, Inc. v. Flushing Nat’l Bank, 755 F.2d 239, 251 (2d Cir.1984) (applying New York law), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
LRL Properties v. Portage Metropolitan Housing Authority
See also Smith v. Smythe-Cramer Co., 754 F.2d 180, 185 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Garcia v. Valdes (In re Garcia)
See, e.g., Durante Bros. and Sons, Inc. v. Flushing Nat’l Bank, 571 F.Supp. 489, 492 (E.D.N.Y.1983) (usury action under 215(6) brought over two years after last payment time barred), aff'd in part vacated in part 755 F.2d 289 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985); Shute v. Stattman, 254 A.D. 783, 783 , 4 N.Y.S.2d 746, 747 (2d Dep’t 1938) (usury action must be commenced one year after payment).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America v. Wometco Enterprises, Inc.
See, e.g., Durante Bros. & Sons, Inc. v. Flushing Nat’l Bank, 755 F.2d 239, 251-52 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 473 U.S. 906 , 105 S.Ct. 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985). 8 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Michael Tellis v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company and Parker House Sausage Company
(2×)
Co., 792 F.2d 341, 352, 353 (3d Cir.1986); accord Compton v. Ide, 732 F.2d 1429, 1433 (9th Cir.1984) (applying the California three-year period for actions based on statute); see also Durante Bros. & Sons, Inc. v. Flushing Nat’l Bank, 755 F.2d 239, 249 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 105 S.Ct, 3530 , 87 L.Ed.2d 654 (1985). 7 In my view, the approach of the Third Circuit in Malley-Duff is the most realistic approach to the problem of selecting an appropriate statute of limitations for civil RICO actions.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Durante Bros. & Sons, Inc.
v.
National Bank of New York City
v.
National Bank of New York City
No. 84-1758.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jul 1, 1985.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.