green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 1×
5.8 score
“we require an unequivocal indication that the state intends to consent to federal jurisdiction that otherwise would be barred by the eleventh amendment.”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re HMCA (Carolina), Inc.
we require an unequivocal indication that the state intends to consent to federal jurisdiction that otherwise would be barred by the eleventh amendment.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Christie
See Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 241 , 105 S.Ct. 3142, 3146 , 87 L.Ed.2d 171 (1985), reh’g denied, 473 U.S. 926 , 106 S.Ct. 18 , 87 L.Ed.2d 696 (1985) (waivers of Eleventh Amendment immunity fall subject to the most stringent examinations).
discussed
Cited "see"
Headrick v. Georgia (In Re Headrick)
See, Atascadero State Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 241 , 105 S.Ct. 3142, 3146 , 87 L.Ed.2d 171 (1985) reh’g denied, 473 U.S. 926 , 106 S.Ct. 18 , 87 L.Ed.2d 696 (1985) (A State does not waive its Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit in federal court by waiving its immunity from suit in state court.) Although Georgia has not legislatively waived its Eleventh Amendment immunity, the weight of authority establishes that it can, and here has, waived this immunity by filing a proof of claim against the Debtor’s estate.
discussed
Cited "see"
Burke v. Georgia (In Re Burke)
See, Atascadero State Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 241 , 105 S.Ct. 3142, 3146 , 87 L.Ed.2d 171 (1985) reh’g denied, 473 U.S. 926 , 106 S.Ct. 18 , 87 L.Ed.2d 696 (1985) (a State does not waive its Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit in federal court by waiving its immunity from suit in state court).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated October 29, 1992. United States of America v. John Doe
(2×)
See Butcher v. Bailey, 753 F.2d 465, 469 (6th Cir.) (leaving open the possibility that private papers may be protected where compelled disclosure would “break the heart of our sense of privacy”)’ (citations omitted), cert dismissed, 473 U.S. 925 , 106 S.Ct. 17 , 87 L.Ed.2d 696 (1985); In re Steinberg, 837 F.2d 527, 530 (1st Cir.1988) (same); United States v. Mason, 869 F.2d 414, 416 (8th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 907 , 109 S.Ct. 3219 , 106 L.Ed.2d 569 (1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
995 Fifth Avenue Associates, L.P. v. New York State Department of Taxation & Finance (In Re 995 Fifth Avenue Associates, L.P.)
See Parden v. Terminal Railway of the Alabama State Docks Dep’t, 377 U.S. 184 , 84 S.Ct. 1207 , 12 L.Ed.2d 233 (1964), overruled in part, Welch v. Texas Dep't of Highways and Public Transp., 483 U.S. 468, 478 , 107 S.Ct. 2941, 2948 , 97 L.Ed.2d 389 (1987). 7 However, before this can occur, the language of the congressional enactment must manifest “a clear intent to condition participation ... on a State’s consent to waive its constitutional immunity.” Atascadero State Hosp. v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234, 237 , 105 S.Ct. 3142, 3144 , 87 L.Ed.2d 171 (1985), reh’g denied 473 U.S. 926 , 106 S…
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated May 9, 1990
See Butcher v. Bailey, 753 F.2d 465, 469 (6th Cir.1985) cert. dismissed, 473 U.S. 925 , 106 S.Ct. 17 , 87 L.Ed.2d 696 (1985); United States v. Mason, 869 F.2d 414, 416 (8th Cir.1989). 6 .
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Stoecker
See Butcher v. Bailey, 753 F.2d 465, 470 (6th Cir.1985) cert. denied 473 U.S. 925 , 106 S.Ct. 17 , 87 L.Ed.2d 696 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tew v. Arizona State Retirement System
See Atascadero State Hospital v. Scanlon, 473 U.S. 234 , 105 S.Ct. 3142 , 87 L.Ed.2d 171 , reh’g denied, 473 U.S. 926 , 106 S.Ct. 18 , 87 L.Ed.2d 696 (1985); Pennhurst, 465 U.S. 89 , 104 S.Ct. 900 ; Fitzpatrick v. Bitzer, 427 U.S. 445 , 96 S.Ct. 2666 , 49 L.Ed.2d 614 (1976).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Slone-Stiver v. Broock (In Re Tower Metal Alloy Co.)
Doe, 465 U.S. at 613-14 , 104 S.Ct. at 1242-43 ; Fisher, 425 U.S. at 410-12 , 96 S.Ct. at 1580-82 ; see also Butcher v. Bailey, 753 F.2d 465, 469 (6th Cir.), cert. dismissed, Bailey v. Butcher, 473 U.S. 925 , 106 S.Ct. 17 , 87 L.Ed.2d 696 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McBee v. Brady (In Re Brady)
See also Butcher v. Bailey, 753 F.2d 465 , 467 n. 3 (6th Cir.), cert. dismissed, Bailey v. Butcher, 473 U.S. 925 , 106 S.Ct. 17 , 87 L.Ed.2d 696 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Coleman v. American Red Cross
Taylor, 519 F.2d at 355; see also, Butcher v. Bailey, 753 F.2d 465, 471 (6th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 473 U.S. 925 , 106 S.Ct. 17 , 87 L.Ed.2d 696 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Coleman v. American Red Cross
Taylor, 519 F.2d at 355; see also, Butcher v. Bailey, 753 F.2d 465, 471 (6th Cir.), cert. dismissed, 473 U.S. 925 , 106 S.Ct. 17 , 87 L.Ed.2d 696 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McIntyre's Mini Computer Sales Group, Inc. v. Creative Synergy Corp.
United States v. Doe, 465 U.S. 605, 612-14 , 104 S.Ct. 1237, 1242-43 , 79 L.Ed.2d 552 (1984); see also Butcher v. Bailey, 753 F.2d 465, 469 (6th Cir.), cert. dismissed, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 17 , 87 L.Ed.2d 696 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Connelly
See also, In Re Butcher, 43 B.R. 60, 62 (Bankr.E.D.Tenn.1984) and In Re Butcher, 38 B.R. 785, 794 (Bankr.E.D.Tenn.1984), aff'd in part, rev’d in part, 753 F.2d 465 (6th Cir.1985) cert. dismissed, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 17 , 87 L.Ed.2d 696 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
San Francisco Police Officers' Assn.
v.
City and County of San Francisco
v.
City and County of San Francisco
No. A-28.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Aug 28, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: D. Puerto Rico (1)
D. C. N. D. Cal. Application for stay, addressed to The Chief Justice and referred to the Court, denied.