green
Positive treatment
13.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 24 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Fazio v. Fazio
See Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. Tucker, 195 Conn. 218, 222 , 487 A.2d 528 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S. Ct. 135 , 88 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Detar v. Coast Venture XXVX, Inc.
See Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. Tucker, 195 Conn. 218, 222 , 487 A.2d 528 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S. Ct. 135 , 88 L.
cited
Cited "see"
Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del Grosso
See Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. Tucker, 195 Conn. 218, 222 , 487 A.2d 528 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S. Ct. 135 , 88 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Community Electric Service Of Los Angeles, Inc. v. National Electrical Contractors Association, Inc.
See Tenneco West, Inc. v. Marathon Oil Co., 756 F.2d 769, 771 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S.Ct. 134 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985) (intermediate appellate state court decision not to be disregarded, particularly where the highest court has refused to review). 32 We also disagree that Welco treats a statute of limitation as a meritorious defense incorrectly.
discussed
Cited "see"
Community Electric Service of Los Angeles, Inc. v. National Electrical Contractors Ass'n
See Tenneco West, Inc. v. Marathon Oil Co., 756 F.2d 769, 771 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S.Ct. 134 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985) (intermediate appellate state court decision not to be disregarded, particularly where the highest court has refused to review).
cited
Cited "see"
Collins v. Seafarers Pension Trust
See Hoover v. Cumberland, Maryland Area Teamsters Pension Fund, 756 F.2d 977, 984 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S.Ct. 135 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Collins v. Seafarers Pension Trust
See Hoover v. Cumberland, Maryland Area Teamsters Pension Fund, 756 F.2d 977, 984 (3 Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S.Ct. 135 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985). 31 Because the Secretary has a significant role in protecting employees' accrued benefits from adverse retroactive treatment, we reject the argument of the Trustees that, putting aside questions of adequacy and lateness of their notice of amendment, the amendment is justified because by affidavit it is shown that the actuary has determined the Trust's unfunded past service liability was approximately $75 million and adoption of the amen…
cited
Cited "see"
American Bank v. Eagle Construction Co.
See Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. Tucker, 195 Conn. 218, 223 , 487 A.2d 528 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S. Ct. 135 , 88 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
James Chongris and George Chongris v. Board of Appeals of the Town of Andover
See Raskiewicz v. Town of New Boston, 754 F.2d 38, 44 (1st Cir.) (“where ... the state offers a panoply of adminis *42 trative and judicial remedies, litigants may not ordinarily obtain federal court review of local zoning and planning disputes by means of 42 U.S.C. § 1983”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 135 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985); Roy v. City of Augusta, 712 F.2d 1517, 1523 (1st Cir.1983) (similar).
cited
Cited "see"
Cunha v. Ward Foods, Inc.
See Tenneco West, Inc. v. Marathon Oil Co., 756 F.2d 769, 771 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 134 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Cunha v. Ward Foods, Inc.
See Tenneco West, Inc. v. Marathon Oil Co., 756 F.2d 769, 771 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 134 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985). 22 The district court stated that Hawaii law was uncertain, but it concluded that the Supreme Court of Hawaii would follow the Restatement (Second) of Torts' position, which limits recovery for negligent misrepresentation to "out-of-pocket" damages. 2 23 The Hawaii Supreme Court has not ruled definitively regarding allowable damages in negligent misrepresentation cases.
cited
Cited "see"
Moorehead v. Bowen
See Tenneco West, Inc. v. Marathon Oil Co., 756 F.2d 769, 771 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 134 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Moorehead v. Bowen
See Tenneco West, Inc. v. Marathon Oil Co., 756 F.2d 769, 771 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 134 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Komanoff v. Mabon, Nugent & Co.
See Zerman v. Ball, 735 F.2d 15, 23 (2d Cir.1984) (raising but not reaching the issue); see also Zerman v. Melton, 735 F.2d 751, 752 (2d Cir.1984) (affirming on other grounds district court’s decision finding no private right under Rule 10b-16), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S.Ct. 135 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985); compare Metzner v. D.H.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Casa Marie Hogar Geriatrico, Inc. v. Rivera-Santos
See, e.g., Raskiewicz v. Town of New Boston, 754 F.2d 38 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S.Ct 135 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985); see also Sierra Club v. Secretary of Army, 820 F.2d 513, 518-20 (1st Cir.1987) (upholding district court award of fees under EAJA where district court, on remand, had relied on a prior appellate decision in making its determination that government's original position was not substantially justified). 5 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Town of Southbury v. Colonial Land Investors, No. 0119069 (May 13, 1994)
See also Hartford National Bank Trust Co. v. Tucker , 195 Conn. 218 , 225 n. 5, 487 A.2d 528 , cert. denied 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S.Ct. 135 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985) (after fifth appeal, Supreme Court suggests that the trial court may terminate a stay on subsequent appeals after remand); Connecticut Savings Bank v. Howes , supra, 9 Conn. App. 447 n. 2 (trial court properly terminated stay where defendant appealed the denial of a motion to open a judgment previously appealed).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joan A. Shawley v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation
See 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (19) (1992); see also Hoover v. Cumberland, MD., Area Teamsters Pension Fund, 756 F.2d 977 , 983 n. 14 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S.Ct. 135 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985) 9 In Bouchard, an employee of Crystal Coin Shop, Robert Bouchard, quit his job approximately fifteen days before the Crystal terminated the pension plan in which Bouchard had been a participant. 843 F.2d at 12 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Shawley v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
See 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (19) (1992); see also Hoover v. Cumberland, MD., Area Teamsters Pension Fund, 756 F.2d 977 , 983 n. 14 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S.Ct. 135 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Smithfield Concerned Citizens for Fair Zoning v. Town of Smithfield Ex Rel. Rainville
See, e.g., Raskiewicz v. Town of New Boston, 754 F.2d 38, 44 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S.Ct. 135 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985); Creative Environments, Inc. v. Estabrook, 680 F.2d 822, 833 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 989 , 103 S.Ct. 345 , 74 L.Ed.2d 385 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Robert J. Batchelor v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 861 Pension and Retirement Fund
See also Hoover v. Cumberland, MD AREA Teamsters Pension Fund, 756 F.2d 977 , 984 (3rd Cir.), cert. denied 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S.Ct. 135 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985) (holding that ERISA “flatly prohibits reductions of accrued benefits” unless the Secretary of the Treasury grants a request to amend benefits); Meagher v. IAM Pension Plan, 856 F.2d 1418 , 1423 (9th Cir.1988), ce rt. denied — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 1943 , 104 L.Ed.2d 414 (1989) (finding inoperative an amendment reducing accrued benefits that was never approved by the Secretary of the Treasury). 9 The administrator of the Pension Fund n…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Peduto v. City of North Wildwood
See Doerinkel v. Hills-borough Township, 835 F.2d 1052 (3d Cir. 1987) (applying claim and issue preclusion to bar federal court constitutional takings action after plaintiff was unsuccessful in state court action); Tancrel v. Mayor & Council, 583 F.Supp. 1548 (D.N.J.1984) (same); see also Griffin v. State of Rhode Island, 760 F.2d 359 (1st Cir.) (applying “res judicata” to bar federal takings action following state condemnation proceeding and subsequent state court actions), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S.Ct. 134 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
R.H. Ashenbaugh v. Crucible Inc. 1975 Salaried Retirement Plan
See also Hoover v. Cumberland, Maryland Area Teamsters Pension Fund, 756 F.2d 977, 982 (3d Cir.) (stating that House Report contrasts benefits which serve a primary function of providing retirement income with specialized, ancillary benefits), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S.Ct. 135 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985). 2 139 The court in Amato concluded that the House Report did not support the conclusion of the district court that the emphasized language excluded unreduced early retirement benefits from the definition of accrued benefits.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Ashenbaugh v. Crucible Inc.
See also Hoover v. Cumberland, Maryland Area Teamsters Pension Fund, 756 F.2d 977, 982 (3d Cir.) (stating that House Report contrasts benefits which serve a primary function of providing retirement income with specialized, ancillary benefits), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 845 , 106 S.Ct. 135 , 88 L.Ed.2d 111 (1985). 2 The court in Amato concluded that the House Report did not support the conclusion of the district court that the emphasized language excluded unreduced early retirement benefits from the definition of accrued benefits.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Raskiewicz
v.
Town of New Boston
v.
Town of New Boston
No. 85-77.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1985.
Published
C. A. 1st Cir. Certiorari denied.