Harney v. United States, 474 U.S. 847 (1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Harney v. United States, 474 U.S. 847 (1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
46 citation events (7 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Raymond D. Wallace v. United States (ca7, 1998-04-06)
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986 2006 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 7 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" Raymond D. Wallace v. United States
7th Cir. · 1998 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rutter v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 760 F.2d 466, 468 (2d Cir.) (per curiam) (interpreting the “under a statute in the nature of a workmen’s compensation act” language of 26 C.F.R. § 1.104 -l(b) to refer only to federal and state statutes, city ordinances, and administrative regulations), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 848 , 106 S.Ct. 141 , 88 L.Ed.2d 116 (1985).
discussed Cited "see" Amoco Production Co. v. Fina Oil & Chem. Co.
La. Ct. App. · 1996 · signal: see · confidence high
See Pogo Producing Company v. Shell Offshore, Inc., 898 F.2d at 1064 , and Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Belco Petroleum Corporation, 755 F.2d 1151, 1154 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 847 , 106 S.Ct. 140 , 88 L.Ed.2d 116 (1985).
discussed Cited "see" Craft v. United States
S.D. Ind. · 1995 · signal: see · confidence high
See Rutter v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 760 F.2d 466, 468 (2d Cir.1985) (holding sick leave payments not ex-cludable from gross income because the labor contract on which they were based is not a “statute” for purposes of Treas.Reg. § 1.104-1(b)), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 848 , 106 S.Ct. 141 , 88 L.Ed.2d 116 (1985).
discussed Cited "see" Judd v. Packard
D. Maryland · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Heintz, 760 F.2d 1408, 1417 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 847 , 106 S.Ct. 141 , 88 L.Ed.2d 116 (1985); see also Cleburne, 473 U.S. at 442 , 105 S.Ct. at 3255-56 .
discussed Cited "see" Lumber & Wood Products, Inc. v. New Hampshire Insurance Company, Etc.
11th Cir. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Belco Petroleum Corp., 755 F.2d 1151, 1153-54 (5th Cir.) (“The facial interpretation of the contract is a question of law not subject to the clearly erroneous standard”), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 140 , 88 L.Ed.2d 116 (1985); Washington v. Watkins, 655 F.2d 1346, 1352-53 (5th Cir.1981) (“Mixed questions of fact and law are not, as a general matter, renewable under the clearly erroneous standard”), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 949 , 102 S.Ct. 2021 , 72 L.Ed.2d 474 (1982).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Amoco Production Company, and Texaco, Inc. v. Forest Oil Corporation
5th Cir. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Belco Petroleum Corp., 755 F.2d 1151, 1153-54 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 847 , 106 S.Ct. 140 , 88 L.Ed.2d 116 (1985) (under Louisiana law, the facial interpretation of a contract is a question of law not subject to the clearly erroneous standard). 4 .Indeed, to say that the "sole cost, risk and expense" provision encompasses literally all risks inherent in the operation is to say that Forest effectively agreed to assume the risk of Amoco’s failure to perform and that Forest would be liable to Amoco even if Amoco deliberately pushed the crane and the w…
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Roy P. Boucvalt, M.D., Cross-Appellant v. Board of Commissioners of Hospital Service District No. 1, Iberia Parish, Cross-Appellees (2×)
5th Cir. · 1986 · signal: compare · confidence low
Compare Makofsky, 576 F.2d at 1229-30 , with Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Belco Petroleum Corp., 755 F.2d 1151, 1153-54 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 140 , 88 L.Ed.2d 116 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Harney
v.
United States
No. 85-149.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1985.
474 U.S. 847
Published

C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.