green
Positive treatment
5.2 score
Treatment trajectory · 1982 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1982
2004
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
DeLuca ex rel. DeLuca v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Id. at 277.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Amy Deluca v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
Id. at 277.
discussed
Cited "see"
Connolly v. Union Pacific R. Co.
Courts have cautioned against an expansive application of the exception, on the basis that it may raise thorny issues of federal-state relations and "could effectively abrogate the rule that a plaintiff is master of his or her complaint." United Jersey Banks, 783 F.2d at 368 ; see Hunter v. United Van Lines, 746 F.2d 635, 640 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 863 , 106 S.Ct. 180 , 88 L.Ed.2d 150 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Miles v. Okun
See Hunter v. United Van Lines, 746 F.2d 635, 639 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 863 , 106 S.Ct. 180 , 88 L.Ed.2d 150 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Chase v. W.R. Grace & Co.-Conn.
See Hunter v. United Van Lines, 746 F.2d 635, 639 (9th Cir.1984), ce rt. den., 474 U.S. 863 , 106 S.Ct. 180 , 88 L.Ed.2d 150 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Pena v. Downey Savings & Loan, Ass'n
See Hunter v. United Van Lines, 746 F.2d 635, 639-40 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 863 , 106 S.Ct. 180 , 88 L.Ed.2d 150 (1985); Wright, Law of Federal Courts, § 38, 230 (5th ed.1994).
cited
Cited "see"
Campos v. Sociedad Aeronautica De Medellin Consolidada, S.A.
See Hunter v. United Van Lines, 746 F.2d 635 (9th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 863 , 106 S.Ct. 180 , 88 L.Ed.2d 150 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Eyak Native Village v. Exxon Corporation
See Hunter v. United Van Lines, 746 F.2d 635, 646 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 863 , 106 S.Ct. 180 , 88 L.Ed.2d 150 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank Chmiel v. Beverly Wilshire Hotel Company Regent International Hotels, Ltd.
Id. at 997 (citations omitted) (emphasis added); accord Hunter v. United Van Lines, 746 F.2d 635, 643 (9th Cir.1985) (“removal is improper when federal law simply displaces state law without replacing the state cause of action with a federal one”) cert. denied, 474 U.S. 863 , 106 S.Ct. 180 , 88 L.Ed.2d 150 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
MacHinists Automotive Trades District Lodge No. 190 of Northern California v. Peterbilt Motors Co.
See id.
cited
Cited "see"
United Pacific Insurance v. Montana ex rel. Department of Agriculture
Accord, Hunter v. United Van Lines, 746 F.2d 635 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 180 , 88 L.Ed.2d 150 , reh’g denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 547 , 88 L.Ed.2d 476 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ex Parte Bravo
See Ex Parte Chambers, 688 S.W.2d 483 (Tex.Cr.App.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 181 , 88 L.Ed.2d 150 (1985). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Prater v. State
See Moore v. State, 672 S.W.2d 242 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1984, no pet.); see also Ex parte Chambers, 688 S.W.2d 483, 485 (Tex.Cr.App.1985) (Campbell, J., concurring), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 864 , 106 S.Ct. 181 , 88 L.Ed.2d 150 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Step-Saver Data Systems, Inc. v. Wyse Technology and the Software Link, Inc
See, e.g., Indian Coffee Corp. v. Proctor & Gamble Co., 752 F.2d 891 , 894 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 863 , 106 S.Ct. 180 , 88 L.Ed.2d 150 (1985). 53 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Craig v. Government Employees' Insurance
See also Hunter v. United Van Lines, 746 F.2d 635 (9th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 863 , 106 S.Ct. 180 , 88 L.Ed.2d 150 , reh. denied, 474 U.S. 1014 , 106 S.Ct. 547 , 88 L.Ed.2d 476 (1985), and Hobgood v. Parish of East Baton Rouge, 703 F.Supp. 1243 (M.D.La.1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Smith v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.
See, e.g., Indian Coffee Corp. v. Proctor & Gamble Co., 752 F.2d 891 (3rd Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 863 , 106 S.Ct. 180 , 88 L.Ed.2d 150 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Barbecue Inn, Inc. v. Carolina Power & Light Co.
See, e.g., Indian Coffee Corp. v. Proctor & Gamble Co., 752 F. 2d 891, 894-95 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 863 , 106 S.Ct. 180 , 88 L.Ed. 2d 150 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rabb v. State
See Moore v. State, 672 S.W.2d 242 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 1984, no pet.); see also Ex parte Chambers, 688 S.W.2d 483, 485 (Tex.Cr.App.1985) (Campbell, J., concurring), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 181 , 88 L.Ed.2d 150 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Bailey
v.
Buckeye Cellulose Corp.
v.
Buckeye Cellulose Corp.
No. 84-6742.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1985.
Consideration, Took.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Justice Powell took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.