green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 2×
8.4 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 1 distinct case, last quoted 1991 ·
…should defendant file a rule 12(b) motion simultaneously with his answer, the court will view the motion as having preceded the answer and thus as having been interposed in a timely fashion
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 27 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Methods Research, Inc. v. Ottawa Bancshares, Inc.
in selecting and ordering a few documents out of thousands counsel could not help but reveal important aspects of his understanding of the case.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Hercules & Co. v. Beltway Carpet Service, Inc.
(2×)
should defendant file a rule 12(b) motion simultaneously with his answer, the court will view the motion as having preceded the answer and thus as having been interposed in a timely fashion
discussed
Cited "see"
Young v. Annarino
(2×)
See Beckham v. Harris, 756 F.2d 1032 , 1037 n. 8 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 231 (1985) (disciplinary guidelines in department personnel manual that an employee could be fired only for violation of specified conduct was insufficient to establish a property interest in continued employment).
cited
Cited "see"
Haworth, Inc. v. Herman Miller, Inc.
See Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 316 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985) (attorney selection of facts reveals opinion work product).
discussed
Cited "see"
Swarthmore Radiation Oncology, Inc. v. Lapes
See Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 316 (3d Cir.) (opinion work product includes such items as the inferences an attorney draws from interviews of witnesses), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
NL Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance
See Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 316 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Leonen v. Johns-Manville
See Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312 (3d Cir.), cert, denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United Coal Companies v. Powell Construction Company and Interstate Equipment Corporation and Bethlehem Steel Corporation
See Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 315, 319 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985); Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 738 F.2d 587, 591 (3d Cir.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
Hydramar, Inc. v. General Dynamics Corp.
See Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985); Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 738 F.2d 587 (3d Cir.1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shelton v. American Motors Corporation
See Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 316 (3d Cir.1985) (selection and compilation of documents by counsel falls within the highly protective category of opinion work product), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Shelton v. American Motors Corp.
See Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 316 (3d Cir.1985) (selection and compilation of documents by counsel falls within the highly protective category of opinion work product), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Gardner v. Manor Care of Boca Raton, Inc.
State v. Rabin, 495 So.2d 257, 262 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986); see also Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 316 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
J. Ronnie Jackson v. Charles H. Long, Individually, and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Buncombe County, Teresa A. Penland v. Charles H. Long, Individually, and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Buncombe County
(2×)
See Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 541 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1492 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985) (" 'Property' cannot be defined by the procedures provided for its deprivation any more than can life or liberty"); Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 250-51 , 103 S.Ct. 1741, 1748-49 , 75 L.Ed.2d 813 (1982) (holding that the state may require procedures for reasons other than protection of substantive rights, but in so doing does not create independent substantive right); see also Beckham v. Harris, 756 F.2d 1032 , 1037 n. 8 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Jackson v. Long
(2×)
See Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 541 , 105 S.Ct. 1487, 1492 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985) (“ ‘Property’ cannot be defined by the procedures provided for its deprivation any more than can life or liberty”); Olim v. Wakinekona, 461 U.S. 238, 250-51 , 103 S.Ct. 1741, 1748-49 , 75 L.Ed.2d 813 (1982) (holding that, the state may require procedures for reasons other than protection of substantive rights, but in so doing does not create independent substantive right); see also Beckham v. Harris, 756 F.2d 1032 , 1037 n. 8 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Glenmede Trust Company Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz v. B. Ray Thompson, Jr. Juanne J. Thompson Catherine v. Thompson Adella S. Thompson B. Ray Thompson, III Sarah Thompson Tarver Rebekah L. Thompson B. Ray Thompson, Jr., as Trustee of Five Thompson Family Trusts Juanne J. Thompson, as Trustee of Five Thompson Family Trusts Dale A. Keasling, as Trustee of Five Thompson Family Trusts v. The Honorable Herbert J. Hutton, United States District Judge, Nominal
See, e.g., Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985); Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 738 F.2d 587 (3d Cir.1984) 18 We again note that Pepper Hamilton has not asserted that these internal file memoranda are protected by the work product doctrine, which would have required a different analysis by the district court 19 We again note that Pepper Hamilton and Glenmede may possess other means to protect the confidentiality of some of these internal documents.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Glenmede Trust Co. v. Thompson
See, e.g., Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985); Bogosian v. Gulf Oil Corp., 738 F.2d 587 (3d Cir.1984). 18 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re Bieter Company
Under the Bauman court’s test, the writ would issue if, in addition to the satisfaction of the three guidelines mentioned above, “[t]he district court’s order is clearly erroneous as a matter of law.” 557 F.2d at 654-55 ; accord Bendectin, 749 F.2d at 305-06 ; see also Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 314 (3d Cir.) (“a writ of mandamus will only be granted for clear error of law”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.
See, e.g., Spock v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312 , 317-18 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985); Leucadia, Inc. v. Reliance Insurance Co., 101 F.R.D. at 678-79; but see In re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation, 119 F.R.D. 4, 6 (E D. & S.D.N.Y.1988).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Butler Manufacturing Co. v. Americold Corp.
See also Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 317 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Golden Trade v. Jordache
See, e.g., Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 315-18 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Comair Rotron, Inc. v. Minebea Co.
Partnership v. Logrande, 136 F.R.D. 50, 57 (E.D.N.Y.1991) (quoting In re Murphy, 560 F.2d 326, 336 (8th Cir.1977)); Santiago v. Miles, 121 F.R.D. 636, 639 (W.D.N.Y.1988) (“Access to mental impressions, if ever to be permitted, may occur ‘only on a strong showing “of necessity and unavailability by other means.” ’ ”) (citing In re John Doe Corp., 675 F.2d 482, 492 (2d Cir.1982)); see also Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 316 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc. v. Home Indemnity Co.
In Shelton v. American Motors Corp., 805 F.2d 1323 (8th Cir. 1986), the court observed that the work-product doctrine protects not only materials obtained or prepared in anticipation of litigation, “but also the attorney’s mental impressions, including thought processes, opinions, conclusions and legal theories.” Id. at 1328 ; see also Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 316 (3d Cir.) (“Rule 26(b)(3) recognizes the distinction between ordinary and opinion work-product first articulated by the Supreme Court in Hickman v. Taylor”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 …
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re San Juan Dupont Plaza Hotel Fire Litigation. Petition of the Plaintiffs' Steering Committee
See, e.g., Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 316 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 903 , 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985); In Re Murphy, 560 F.2d 326 , 329 n. 1 (8th Cir.1977); Duplan Corp. v. Moulinage et Re-torerie de Chavanoz, 509 F.2d 730, 732 (4th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 997 , 95 S.Ct. 1438 , 43 L.Ed.2d 680 (1975).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Debra A. And George Simon v. G.D. Searle & Co.
(2×)
In Shelton v. American Motors Corp., 805 F.2d 1323 (8th Cir.1986), we observed that the work product doctrine protects not only materials obtained or prepared in anticipation of litigation, “but also the attorney’s mental impressions, including thought processes, opinions, conclusions, and legal theories.” Id. at 1328 ; see also Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312, 316 (3d Cir.) (“Rule 26(b)(3) recognizes the distinction between ‘ordinary’ and ‘opinion’ work product first articulated by the Supreme Court in Hickman v. Taylor”), c e rt. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Hunt v. Bankers Trust Co.
See, e.g., Sporck v. Peil, 759 F.2d 312 , 315 n. 4 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 230 (1985). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bartel Dental Books Co. v. Schultz
(2×)
See, e.g., Beary v. West Publishing Co., 763 F.2d 66, 69 (2d Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 231 (1985); Potamkin Cadillac, 689 F.2d at 381-82 ; Muigai, 682 F.2d at 337 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bartel Dental Books Co., Inc. v. Schultz
(2×)
See, e.g., Beary v. West Publishing Co., 763 F.2d 66, 69 (2d Cir.), cert. denied --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 232 , 88 L.Ed.2d 231 (1985); Potamkin Cadillac, 689 F.2d at 381-82 ; Muigai, 682 F.2d at 337 .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Beckham
v.
Harris
v.
Harris
No. 85-292.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: District of Columbia Court of … (2) · D. Kansas (1)
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.