green
Positive treatment
7.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 28 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "but see"
Dibidale of Louisiana, Inc. v. American Bank & Trust Company, New Orleans
(2×)
See Bruce v. First Federal Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 837 F.2d 712 (5th Cir.1988); Campbell v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 781 F.2d 440 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1159 , 106 S.Ct. 2279 , 90 L.Ed.2d 721 (1986); Parsons Steel, Inc. v. First Alabama Bank, N.A., 679 F.2d 242 (11th Cir.1982); Costner v. Blount Nat'l Bank, 578 F.2d 1192 (6th Cir.1978); but see McGee v. First Fed'l Sav. & Loan Ass'n, 761 F.2d 647 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 273 , 88 L.Ed.2d 234 (1985) (applying the Sherman Act Jefferson Parish standard). 24 The fact that Congress, in enacting the anti-tying provis…
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
State v. Bridges
Justice Jackson, who did not participate in Pinkerton , noted that the Pinkerton holding sustained a conviction of a substantive offense when the record contained no proof of participation in or knowledge of it, on the "theory that conspiracy is equivalent in law to aiding and abetting." Krulewitch, supra, 336 *474 U.S. at 451, 69 S.Ct. at 722 , 93 L.Ed. at 798 (Jackson, J., concurring).
discussed
Cited "see"
Nathan Osburn v. Virginia Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
See United States v. Brown, 763 F.2d 984, 987 (8th Cir.) (“The government has a substantial interest in establishing methods by which it can effectively monitor compliance with the regulations governing the Medicaid Program and root out opportunities for and instances of fraud.”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 273 , 88 L.Ed.2d 234 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Warren
It is well settled that “a party to a conspiracy may be held responsible for a substantive offense committed by a cocon-spirator in furtherance of a conspiracy, even if that party does not participate in or have knowledge of the substantive offense.” United States v. Dean, 59 F.3d 1479, 1489 (5th Cir.1995) (affirming the § 924(c)(1) convictions of two (2) defendants who were charged with and convicted for: (1) conspiracy to possess, and (2) possession, with intent to distribute cocaine base, and (3) using and carrying a firearm (without an aiding, abetting, or conspiracy charge within the…
discussed
Cited "see"
Abateco Services, Inc. v. Theron J. Bell, etc.
See United States v. Brown, 763 F.2d 984 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 273 , 88 L.Ed.2d 234 (1985) (“The government has a substantial interest in establishing methods by which it can effectively monitor compliance with the regulations---- We *517 see no constitutional infirmity in the government requiring a provider to agree to maintain records ... and to permit periodic audits of those records as a condition for [contracting with the government]____”); United States v. Jennings, 724 F.2d 436 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 467 U.S. 1227 , 104 S.Ct. 2682 , 81 L.Ed.2d 877 (19…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Brad Eugene Branch, Kevin Whitecliff, Jaime Castillo, Renos Lenny Avraam, Paul Fatta and Graeme Leonard Craddock
(2×)
See United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830 , 842-43 & n. 12 (11th Cir.) (setting out the burden of proof for self-defense under federal criminal law), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 274 , 88 L.Ed.2d 235 (1985); United States v. Johnson, 542 F.2d 230 , 233-34 n. 4 (5th Cir.1976).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Romeo
State v. Nance, *550 533 N.W.2d 557, 562 (Iowa 1995); accord United States v. Brown, 763 F.2d 984, 989 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 273 , 88 L.Ed.2d 234 (1985) (discussing intent to defraud).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Curtis Dale Smith
But the court is not required to conduct such a hearing in every case, and in camera review is sufficient to discharge its duty of inquiry “in the vast majority of cases.” Gross, 961 F.2d at 1105 ; see United States v. North American Reporting, Inc., 761 F.2d 735, 738-39 (D.C.Cir.) (finding no error in district court’s determination that evidentiary hearing was unnecessary to resolve Jencks Act dispute), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 273 , 88 L.Ed.2d 234 (1985); cf. Palermo, 360 U.S. at 354 , 79 S.Ct. at 1225-26 (“It is ... the function of the trial judge to decide, in light o…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Laspesa, Victor E. Murgo, Steven A. Sarault, Aime J. Sarault
See United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830, 857 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 274 , 88 L.Ed.2d 235 (1985) (prejudice must be “clearly beyond the curative powers of the cautionary instruction”) (quoting United States v. Phillips, 664 F.2d 971, 1017 (5th Cir. Unit B 1981)).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lonnie C. Baggett, Jr.
See United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830, 849 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 274 , 88 L.Ed.2d 235 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Shepherd
See United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830, 847 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 274 , 88 L.Ed.2d 235 (1985); United States v. Montoya, 676 F.2d 428, 431 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 856 , 103 S.Ct. 124 , 74 L.Ed.2d 108 (1982); United States v. Corrigan, 548 F.2d 879, 883 (10th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see"
ca8 1991
Keith Tyler's Brief at 18; accord Larry Tyler's Brief at 17 14 We note that United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 274 , 88 L.Ed.2d 235 (1985), the case upon which the defendants most heavily rely, involved a situation in which the substantive crime, which was the subject of Pinkerton instructions, was not within the scope of the conspiracy.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Oscar Smith, Regina Smith and Gary King, Julia Thom
Fed.R.Crim.P. 14; see United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830, 857 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 274 , 88 L.Ed.2d 235 (1985), 482 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 2489 , 96 L.Ed.2d 380 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael G. Golter
See United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830, 847 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 (1985), cert. denied, 482 U.S. 908 , 107 S.Ct. 2489 , 96 L.Ed.2d 380 (1987).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven Johnson, United States of America v. Tyrone Curry, A/K/A \Santa Claus\"
See United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830, 850 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 274 , 88 L.Ed.2d 235 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Leonardo Bruno
See United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830, 847-51 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 274 , 88 L.Ed.2d 235 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Billy H. Hartness and Brenda K. Keener
See United States v. Brown, 763 F.2d 984, 993 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 273 , 88 L.Ed.2d 234 (1985). 5 .
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Derek Blackmon, Sidney Jones, Tyrone Stephens and Cecilia Grace Roland
See United States v. Alvarrez, 755 F.2d 830 , 848 & n. 22 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 274 , 88 L.Ed.2d 235 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gaffney
United States v. Pinkerton, 328 U.S. 640 , 66 S.Ct. 1180 , 90 L.Ed. 1489 (1946); see United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830, 848 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 274 , 88 L.Ed.2d 235 (1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 2489 , 96 L.Ed.2d 380 (1987). 22 .
cited
Cited "see"
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Peter LARM, M.D., and Haruko Larm, Defendants-Appellants
See United States v. Brown, 763 F.2d 984, 993 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 273 , 88 L.Ed.2d 234 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Everritt v. State
Compare United States v. Alvarez, 755 F2d 830, 848-849 (11th Cir. 1985) (murder of undercover federal agent in midst of drug deal and shootout was reasonably foreseeable consequence of drug conspiracy based on amount of drugs and money involved in deal and likelihood that weapons would be used), cert. denied, Hernandez v. United States, 474 U. S. 905 (106 SC 274, 88 LE2d 235) (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Rivera-Carrillo, Unpublished Decision (3-11-2002)
See, e.g ., United States v. Alvarez (C.A.11, 1985), 755 F.2d 830 , certiorari denied (1985), 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 274 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. McVeigh
McNabb v. United States, 123 F.2d 848 (6th Cir.1941), rev’d on other grounds 318 U.S. 332 , 63 S.Ct. 608 , 87 L.Ed. 819 , reh’g denied 319 U.S. 784 , 63 S.Ct. 1322 , 87 L.Ed. 1727 (1943); see also United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830 (11th Cir.), cert. denied 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 274 , 88 L.Ed.2d 235 (1985), cert. denied sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Gushi Brothers Company Chuji G. Chutaro Beverly L. Chutaro v. Bank of Guam
Sav. & Loan, 840 F.2d 653, 659-61 (9th Cir.1988) (applying antitrust standing principles to the Home Owners’ Loan Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1461 et seq.); see also McGee v. First Federal Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 761 F.2d 647, 648 (11th Cir.) (applying two products and coercion requirements to BHCA), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 273 , 88 L.Ed.2d 234 (1985); see generally MicFState Fertilizer Co. v. Exchange National Bank of Chicago, 877 F.2d 1333 (7th Cir.1989) (discussing applicability of antitrust principles).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jennings
See also United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830, 842-843 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 274 , 88 L.Ed.2d 235 (1985) (knowledge of official status of victim relevant to claim of self-defense, and government may prove either of above alternatives to establish case).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Louis Smith
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830, 842 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 (1985); United States v. Corrigan, 548 F.2d 879, 883 (10th Cir. 1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Emmett Lovell Nabors
See, e.g., United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830, 840-841 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 274 , 88 L.Ed.2d 235 (1985); United States v. Czech, 671 F.2d 1195 (8th Cir.1982); United States v. Lopez, 586 F.2d 978 (2d Cir.1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 923 , 99 S.Ct. 1251 , 59 L.Ed.2d 476 (1979).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Anthony Neil Jim
See, e.g., United States v. Alvarez, 755 F.2d 830, 845 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 905 , 106 S.Ct. 274 , 88 L.Ed.2d 235 (1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 107 S.Ct. 2489 , 96 L.Ed.2d 380 (1987); United States v. Taylor, 680 F.2d 378, 381 (5th Cir.1982); United States v. Caruana, 652 F.2d 220, 223 (1st Cir.1981); United States v. Flood, 586 F.2d 391, 392 (5th Cir.1979). 4 . 18 U.S.C. § 113 provides, in part: Whoever, within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States, is guilty of an assault shall be punished as follows ... 5 .
Dutka
v.
Department of the Treasury
v.
Department of the Treasury
No. 85-344.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 15, 1985.
Published
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.