Warnick v. Jin Cha, 474 U.S. 920 (1985). · Go Syfert
Search
Warnick v. Jin Cha, 474 U.S. 920 (1985). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
65 citation events (9 in the last 25 years) across 24 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: Commerce Bancorp, Inc. v. BankAtlantic (njd, 2003-09-25) · Strongest negative: Physicians Formula Cosmetics, Inc. v. West Cabot Cosmetics, Inc. (nyed, 1987-04-20)
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985 2005 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "but see" Physicians Formula Cosmetics, Inc. v. West Cabot Cosmetics, Inc.
E.D.N.Y · 1987 · signal: but see · confidence high
But see Natural Footwear Ltd. v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx, 760 F.2d 1383 , 1406 & n. 61 (3d Cir.) (dictum) (prior use of trademark will apply as well to subsequent use of mark on related products, thereby “essentially allowpng] the later use ... to relate back to the first use”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 249 , 88 L.Ed.2d 257 (1985); Mantle Lamp Co. v. Aladdin Mfg.
discussed Cited "see" Commerce Bancorp, Inc. v. BankAtlantic
D.N.J. · 2003 · signal: see · confidence high
See Natural Footwear Ltd. v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx, 760 F.2d 1383 , 1396 n. 27 (3d Cir.1985) (distinguishing between scope of rights flowing from federal registration and common law rights in a trademark), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 920 , 106 S.Ct. 249 , 88 L.Ed.2d 257 (1985); Ford Motor Co., 930 F.2d at 292 (citations omitted).
cited Cited "see" National Association for Healthcare Communications, Inc. v. Central Arkansas Area Agency on Aging, Inc.
8th Cir. · 2001 · signal: see · confidence high
See Natural Footwear Ltd. v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx, 760 F.2d 1383, 1395 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 920 , 106 S.Ct. 249 , 88 L.Ed.2d 257 (1985); 15 U.S.C. § 1072 .
discussed Cited "see" Zazu Designs, a Partnership v. L'oreal, S.A. (2×)
7th Cir. · 1992 · signal: see · confidence high
See Natural Footwear Ltd. v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx, 760 F.2d 1383 (3d Cir.) (senior user can establish common law rights in geographic areas where it achieved market penetration), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 920 , 106 S.Ct. 249 , 88 L.Ed.2d 257 (1985); SweeTarts, 380 F.2d at 928 (plaintiff's prior use of trademark within a given market area entitles it to exclusive use of that mark within that area); V & V Food Products, Inc. v. Cacique Cheese Co., 683 F.Supp. 662 (N.D.Ill.1988). 37 L'Oreal concedes that ZHD has exclusive rights to use ZAZU for salon services in the Hinsdale area.
cited Cited "see" Country Floors, Inc. v. A Partnership Composed of Charley Gepner and Gary Ford, D/B/A Country Tiles
3rd Cir. · 1991 · signal: see · confidence high
See Natural Footwear Ltd. v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx, 760 F.2d 1383, 1394 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 920 , 106 S.Ct. 249 , 88 L.Ed.2d 257 (1985); Blumenfeld Dev.
discussed Cited "see" Taj Mahal Enterprises, Ltd. v. Trump
D.N.J. · 1990 · signal: see · confidence high
Lois Sportswear, 799 F.2d at 871 ; see Natural Footwear Ltd. v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx, 760 F.2d 1383, 1395, 1403-04 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 920 , 106 S.Ct. 249 , 88 L.Ed.2d 257 (1985) (describing rights of registrant).
cited Cited "see" G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. Anheuser-Busch Inc.
E.D. Wis. · 1987 · signal: see · confidence high
See Natural Footwear Limited v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx, 760 F.2d 1383 , 1406 n. 61 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 920 , 106 S.Ct. 249 , 88 L.Ed.2d 257 (1985).
cited Cited "see, e.g." Cannon v. Cannon
Ind. Ct. App. · 2000 · signal: see also · confidence low
See also Cha v. Warnick, 476 N.E.2d 109, 114 (Ind.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 920 , 106 S.Ct. 249 , 88 L.Ed.2d 257 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Carnival Brand Seafood Co. v. Carnival Brands, Inc.
11th Cir. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
Id. at 1023 (citations and internal quotation marks omitted); see also Natnral Footwear Ltd. v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx, 760 F.2d 1383 , 1406 (3d Cir.1985) ("[O]nce one has established a common law trademark in a product, the prior use of that trademark will apply as well to the use of the same trademark on related products in ascertaining priority of use." (emphasis omitted)), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 920 , 106 S.Ct. 249 , 88 L.Ed.2d 257 (1985); May Dep't Stores Co. v. Prince, 200 U.S.P.Q. 803 , 808-09 (T.T.A.B.1978) (senior user possesses rights in mark superior to those of "a subsequent user o…
cited Cited "see, e.g." Williams v. State
Ind. Ct. App. · 1999 · signal: see also · confidence low
Huffman, 643 N.E.2d at 901 ; see also Cha v. Warwick, 476 N.E.2d 109, 114 (Ind.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 920 , 106 S.Ct. 249 , 88 L.Ed.2d 257 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." Architemps, Inc. v. Architemps, Ltd.
S.D.N.Y. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
Ace Hardware Co., Inc. v. Ace Hardware Corp., 532 F.Supp. 770, 773 (S.D.N.Y.1982); see also Natural Footwear Ltd. v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx, 760 F.2d 1383, 1395 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 920 , 106 S.Ct. 249 , 88 L.Ed.2d 257 (1985).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." V & v. Food Products, Inc. v. Cacique Cheese Co.
N.D. Ill. · 1988 · signal: see also · confidence low
Cacique has the right to use its trademark “except to the extent that such use infringes what valid right [any previous users] have acquired by their continuous use of the same mark prior to [Cacique’s] federal registration.” Burger King of Florida, Inc. v. Hoots, 403 F.2d 904, 907 (7th Cir.1968); see also Natural Footwear Ltd. v. Hart, Schaffner & Marx, 760 F.2d 1383, 1395 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 920 , 106 S.Ct. 249 , 88 L.Ed.2d 257 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Warnick
v.
Jin Cha
No. 85-328.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 21, 1985.
474 U.S. 920
Cited by 1 opinion  |  Published

Sup. Ct. Ind. Certiorari denied.