green
Positive treatment
8.8 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 18 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "but see"
United States v. Deborah E. Morris, United States of America v. Rufus S. McDowney
(2×)
There are no indications that appellants had knowledge of and formed the intent to promote a conspiracy. 2 See Direct Sales, 319 U.S. at 711 , 63 S.Ct. at 1269 ; but cf. United States v. Esdaille, 769 F.2d 104 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 923 , 106 S.Ct. 258 , 88 L.Ed.2d 264 (1985).
examined
Cited "see"
Taylor v. United States
(4×)
While many physical characteristics that may serve as demonstrative evidence are immutable, a voice exemplar "is relatively easy to feign." Id. 530 N.Y.S.2d at 86 , 525 N.E.2d at 732 ; see United States v. Esdaille, 769 F.2d 104, 107 (2d Cir.) (distinguishing voice exemplar from scar or permanent tattoo), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 923 , 106 S.Ct. 258 , 88 L.Ed.2d 264 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Newman
(2×)
See, United States v. Esdaille, 769 F.2d 104 (2d Cir. 1985), cert. denied 474 U.S. 923 , 106 S. Ct. 258 , 88 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
James Barrett v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Barrett, 766 F.2d 609 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 923 , 106 S.Ct. 258 , 88 L.Ed.2d 264 (1985).
examined
Cited "see"
Taylor v. United States
(4×)
See United States v. Esdaille, 769 F.2d 104, 107 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 923 , 106 S.Ct. 258 , 88 L.Ed.2d 264 (1985) (“the fact that exhibition of a physical characteristic is not testimonial in nature, and hence may be compelled at some stage, does not require its admissibility into evidence”; trial court “properly focused principally ... not on whether the proposed exemplar was testimonial but on whether it was reliable”); People v. Scarola, 71 N.Y.2d 769, 776-77 , 525 N.E.2d 728, 731-32 , 530 N.Y.S.2d 83, 86 (1988) (test of admissibility of voice exemplar is “whether it …
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Paul A. Bilzerian
(4×)
See United States v. Esdaille, 769 F.2d 104, 108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 923 , 106 S.Ct. 258 , 88 L.Ed.2d 264 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garcia
(2×)
See United States v. Esdaille, 769 F.2d 104, 108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 923 , 106 S.Ct. 258 , 88 L.Ed.2d 264 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Garcia
(2×)
See United States v. Esdaille, 769 F.2d 104, 108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 923 , 106 S.Ct. 258 , 88 L.Ed.2d 264 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. John Pforzheimer
See United States v. Peterson, 768 F.2d 64, 67-68 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 923 , 106 S.Ct. 257 , 88 L.Ed.2d 264 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Roger Eagle Elk
See United States v. Peterson, 768 F.2d 64, 66-67 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 257 , 88 L.Ed.2d 264 (1985) (Friendly, J.) (interpreting Gipson, supra, in 18 U.S.C. § 2 (a) drug possession case, as requiring that the jury verdict be unanimous with regard to the act of possession, not as to whether defendant was principal or aider or abettor); cf. Gipson, 553 F.2d at 458-59 (instructing jury to convict defendant upon finding he received, concealed, stored, bartered, sold or disposed of stolen property deprived defendant of unanimous verdict because the first three acts are conc…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Neil Patrick Coady
(2×)
See McGrath v. Spirito, 733 F.2d 967, 968-69 (1st Cir.1984) (discussing Fed.R.Civ.P. 51, the virtually identical civil analogue to Fed.R.Crim.P. 30). 3 As one court has noted, in a criminal case, “[s]o strictly is the rule applied that a party who fails to make objection as required by the rule ‘cannot rely on an assurance by the district court that his rights are saved.’ ” United States v. Barrett, 598 F.Supp. 469, 472 (D.Me.1984), aff'd, 766 F.2d 609 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 258 , 88 L.Ed.2d 264 (1985) (citation omitted).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ramos
(2×)
“A defendant challenging a conviction based upon a claim of insufficiency of the evidence bears a heavy burden.” United States v. Feliciano, 223 F.3d 102, 113 , (2d Cir.2000) cert. denied, 532 U.S. 943 , 121 S.Ct. 1405 , 149 L.Ed.2d 348 (2001); see, e.g., United States v. Esdaille, 769 F.2d 104, 108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 923 , 106 S.Ct. 258 , 88 L.Ed.2d 264 (1985); United States v. Martino, 759 F.2d 998, 1002 (2d Cir.1985); United States v. Losada, 674 F.2d 167, 173 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1125 , 102 S.Ct. 2945 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1341 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Meneilly
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Esdaille, 769 F.2d 104, 108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 923 , 106 S.Ct. 258 , 88 L.Ed.2d 264 (1985); United States v. Martino, 759 F.2d 998, 1002 (2d Cir.1985); United States v. Losada, 674 F.2d 167, 173 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 457 U.S. 1125 , 102 S.Ct. 2945 , 73 L.Ed.2d 1341 (1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Baker v. State
See also United States v. Peterson, 768 F.2d 64 (2nd Cir.1985), cert. denied 474 U.S. 923 , 106 S.Ct. 257 , 88 L.Ed.2d 264 ; Lampkins v. Gagnon, 539 F.Supp. 359 (E.D.Wis.1982), aff'd 710 F.2d 374 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1050 , 104 S.Ct. 729 , 79 L.Ed.2d 189 (1984); State v. Moriarty, 87 Or.App. 465 , 742 P.2d 704 (1987); State v. Mclnelly, 146 Ariz. 161 , 704 P.2d 291, 293 (App.1985); State v. Wheeler, 109 Idaho 795 , 711 P.2d 741 (App.1985); State v. Wixon, 30 Wash.App. 63 , 631 P.2d 1033 (1981); People v. Naranjo, 200 Colo. 11 , 612 P.2d 1106, 1109 (1980); Bowen v. State, 606 …
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Manuel Concepcion, Roberto Aponte, and Nelson Frias
(4×)
See, e.g., United States v. Esdaille, 769 F.2d 104, 108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 923 , 106 S.Ct. 258 , 88 L.Ed.2d 264 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hughes v. Patrolmen's Benevolent Ass'n of New York, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Esdaille, 769 F.2d 104, 108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 923 , 106 S.Ct. 258 , 88 L.Ed.2d 264 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hughes v. Patrolmen's Benevolent Association Of The City Of New York, Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Esdaille, 769 F.2d 104, 108 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 923 , 106 S.Ct. 258 , 88 L.Ed.2d 264 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Esdaille
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-5472.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 21, 1985.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.