green
Positive treatment
9.7 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Grocery Manufacturers Ass'n v. Sorrell
(2×)
See Grocery Mfrs. of Am., Inc. v. Gerace, 755 F.2d 993 , 997 (2d Cir.), aff'd, 474 U.S. 801 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985) (mem.).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gardetto v. Mason
(2×)
See Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827, 845 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 803 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985) (holding that after the district court determined that the plaintiffs speech was protected, “the court was required to inform the jury of its ruling that Knapp’s speech was constitutionally protected”).
discussed
Cited "see"
National Broiler Council v. Voss
(2×)
See Grocery Mfrs. of America, Inc. v. Gerace, 581 F.Supp. 658 , 660 m 1 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (USDA ís defendant to Commissioner Gerace's counterclaim), aff 'd in part and rev’d in part, 755 F.2d 993 (2d Cir.), judgment aff d and cert. denied, 474 U.S. 801 , 820, 106 S.Ct. 36 , 69, 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985); American Meat Institute v. Ball, 550 F.Supp. 285, 288 (W.D.Mich.1982) (USDA submits amicus curiae brief), aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Resolution Trust Corp. v. California
(2×)
See Grocery Mfrs. of America, Inc. v. Gerace, 581 F.Supp. 658 , 660 n. 1 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (USDA is defendant to Commissioner Gerace’s counterclaim), aff 'd in part and rev’d in part, 755 F.2d 993 (2d Cir.), judgment aff'd and cert. denied, 474 U.S. 801 , 820, 106 S.Ct. 36 , 69, 88 L.Ed.2d 29, 56 (1985); American Meat Institute v. Ball, 550 F.Supp. 285, 288 (W.D.Mich.1982) (USDA submits amicus curiae brief), aff'd sub nom.
discussed
Cited "see"
Havoco of America, Ltd. v. Hilco, Inc.
(2×)
See Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827, 849 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 803 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985) (citing Foman).
discussed
Cited "see"
50 Fair empl.prac.cas. 1575, 51 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,360 Cheryll Gray, F/k/a Cheryll Lengyel v. Jerome Lacke, Stanley Klein, David Niemann, and Diane Kohn
(2×)
See Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827, 840 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 803 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gray v. Lacke
(2×)
See Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827, 840 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 803 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berg v. Hunter
(2×)
See Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827, 840 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 803 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Berg v. Hunter
(2×)
See Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827, 840 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 803 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Greenberg v. Kmetko
(2×)
See Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827, 843 (7th Cir.) (“It is well-settled in this circuit that ‘a jury verdict will not be set aside if a reasonable basis exists in the record to support that verdict’ ”) (quoting Spesco, Inc. v. General Electric Co., 719 F.2d 233, 237 (7th Cir.1983)), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 803 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard Paul Greenberg v. Thomas Kmetko and Bruce Weflen, Richard Paul Greenberg, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. Thomas Kmetko and Bruce Weflen, Defendants-Cross-Appellees
(2×)
See Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827, 843 (7th Cir.) ("It is well-settled in this circuit that 'a jury verdict will not be set aside if a reasonable basis exists in the record to support that verdict.' ") (quoting Spesco, Inc. v. General Electric Co., 719 F.2d 233, 237 (7th Cir.1983)), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 803 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985). 41 The judgment of the district court is V ACATED, R EMANDED in part, and A FFIRMED in part. 42 KANNE, Circuit Judge, concurring. 43 No area of the law generates more agonizing decisions than those involving child custody determinations.
discussed
Cited "see"
Integrity Management International, Inc. v. Tombs & Sons, Inc.
(2×)
See Grocery Mfrs. of America v. Gerace, 755 F.2d 993 (2d Cir.1985) (finding preemption where state statute in direct conflict with valid federal regulation), aff'd, 474 U.S. 801 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 820 , 106 S.Ct. 69 , 88 L.Ed.2d 56 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Integrity Management International, Inc. v. Tombs & Sons, Inc.
(2×)
See Grocery Mfrs. of America v. Gerace, 755 F.2d 993 (2d Cir.1985) (finding preemption where state statute in direct conflict with valid federal regulation), aff'd, 474 U.S. 801 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 820 , 106 S.Ct. 69 , 88 L.Ed.2d 56 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richard Paul Greenberg v. Thomas Kmetko and Bruce Weflen, Richard Paul Greenberg, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant v. Thomas Kmetko and Bruce Weflen, Defendants-Cross-Appellees
(2×)
See Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827, 843 (7th Cir.) ("It is well-settled in this circuit that 'a jury verdict will not be set aside if a reasonable basis exists in the record to support that verdict.' ") (quoting Spesco Inc. v. General Electric Co., 719 F.2d 233, 237 (7th Cir.1983)), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985). 58 For the foregoing reasons the judgment of the court below is AFFIRMED in part and VACATED and REMANDED in part. 59 COFFEY, Circuit Judge, dissenting. 60 The Majority in their opinion conclude that Greenberg, in expressing his disagreement with th…
discussed
Cited "see"
Greenberg v. Kmetko
(2×)
See Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827, 843 (7th Cir.) (“It is well-settled in this circuit that ‘a jury verdict will not be set aside if a reasonable basis exists in the record to support that verdict.’ ”) (quoting Spesco Inc. v. General Electric Co., 719 F.2d 233, 237 (7th Cir.1983)), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Marquez v. Turnock
(2×)
See also, Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827, 845 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 803 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
Mekss v. Wyoming Girls' School
(4×)
See also Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827 (7th Cir.), cert. denied 474 U.S. 803 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985) and Anderson v. Central Point School Dist.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Litton Industries, Inc. v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn Loeb Inc.
(2×)
See, e.g., Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827, 849 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, appeal dismissed, 474 U.S. 803, 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985); Leroy v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & Ins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Wadud v. Willsie
(2×)
See, e.g., Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 803 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985) (teacher’s communications with school board concerning inequitable mileage allowance for coaches was an attempt to inform the public and educational policymakers of inequitable administration of funds); McKinley v. City of Eloy, 705 F.2d 1110 (9th Cir.1983) (police officer’s complaints to city council regarding rate of compensation for city police related to city’s ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, a matter of public concern).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Conaway v. Smith
Wren v. Spurlock, 798 F.2d at 1317 ; see also, Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827, 845 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 803 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 8 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985). .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Conaway v. Smith
Wren v. Spurlock, 798 F.2d at 1317 ; see also, Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827, 845 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 803 , 106 S.Ct. 36 , 8 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985) 9 The district court made reference to a statement Conaway made while out drinking with Robert Wiggins.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Brown
(2×)
See also Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc. v. Gerace, 755 F.2d 993, 999 (2d Cir.), aff’d mem., — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sears, Roebuck And Co. v. Brown
(2×)
See also Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc. v. Gerace, 755 F.2d 993, 999 (2d Cir.), aff'd mem., --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985). 43 Appellants argue that the Act prevents the accomplishment of the full purposes and objectives of Congress in enacting the 1967 amendments to the SLHCA.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rutan v. Republican Party of Illinois
(2×)
See also Knapp v. Whitaker, 757 F.2d 827 (7th Cir.), cert. denied — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 36 , 88 L.Ed.2d 29 (1985); Bart v. Telford, 677 F.2d 622 (7th Cir. 1982); McGill v. Board of Education, 602 F.2d 774 (7th Cir.1979); and Muller v. Conlisk, 429 F.2d 901 (7th Cir.1970).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
City of Spokane v. Port
See, e.g., Gordon v. State, 108 Idaho 178 , 697 P.2d 1192, 1193 (Ct. App.), appeal dismissed,_U.S._, 88 L.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Whitaker
v.
Knapp
v.
Knapp
No. 84-1824.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1985.
Cited by 79 opinions | Published
Appeal from C. A. 7th Cir. dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari denied.