green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
9.9 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1991 ·
…he repetition/evasion exception does not require a repetition of the exact law or behavior. the focus is on whether the same issues, arising from a repetition of a similar law or action, are likely to recur.
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1969 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1969
1997
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 39 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
56 Fair empl.prac.cas. 721, 56 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 40,888 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Recruit U.S.A., Inc. Interplace/transworld Recruit, Inc.
he repetition/evasion exception does not require a repetition of the exact law or behavior. the focus is on whether the same issues, arising from a repetition of a similar law or action, are likely to recur.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Recruit U.S.A., Inc.
he repetition/evasion exception does not require a repetition of the exact law or behavior. the focus is on whether the same issues, arising from a repetition of a similar law or action, are likely to recur.
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Castle v. Sangamo Weston, Inc.
has expressly held that an award of front pay - i.e. prospective lost earnings - may be an appropriate remedy in an age discrimination suit because reinstatement would be impracticable or inadequate.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Mitchell v. Sisters of Charity of Incarnate Word
The three PCO positions have since been filled, and to reinstate Plaintiffs at this time would displace innocent employees which would be inconsistent with the purposes of the ADEA Deloach, 897 F.2d at 822 (citing Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1448-49 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 *804 (1985)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Agro Air Assoc. v. Houston Casualty
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1447-48 (11th Cir.) ("[A] new trial should be ordered only where the verdict is so excessive as to shock the conscience of the court."), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); Hatfield v. Anthony Forest Prods.
discussed
Cited "see"
AGRO AIR ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HOUSTON CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1447-48 (11th Cir.) ("[A] new trial should be ordered only where the verdict is so excessive as to shock the conscience of the court.”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); Hatfield v. Anthony Forest Prods.
cited
Cited "see"
Gray v. Russell Corp.
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries, Inc., 758 F.2d 1435, 1443 (11th Cir.), cert. den'd, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
LaFleur v. Wallace State Community College
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1448 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richardson v. Leeds Police Department
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1448 (11th Cir.) (the decision of whether reinstatement should be ordered is within the sound discretion of the district court), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); Carmichael v. Birmingham Saw Works, 738 F.2d 1126, 1136 (11th Cir.1984) (injunction ordering employer to refrain from discriminatory practices not justified where the plaintiff is not reinstated).
discussed
Cited "see"
Richardson v. Leeds Police Dept.
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., Inc. , 758 F.2d 1435 , 1448 (11th Cir.) (the 9 In each case, the applicant sought to return to the same position he had vacated, a similar length of time elapsed between the officer's departure and his request to be rehired and the mayor made the final decision. 10 We reject without discussion Richardson's assertion that the jury's finding was inconsistent with its deadlock on the issue of whether the City's refusal to rehire him was motivated by a discriminatory purpose. 15 decision of whether reinstatement should be ordered is within the sound discretion of…
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Charles Lloyd Patterson
See United States v. Smith Grading & Paving, Inc., 760 F.2d 527, 530-31 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); see also United States v. Abel, 469 U.S. 45, 56 , 105 S.Ct. 465, 471 , 83 L.Ed.2d 450 (1984) (evidence impermissible under Rule 608(b) was still properly admissible to show bias); United States v. Martinez, 962 F.2d 1161, 1164-65 (5th Cir.1992) (same); Fed.R.Evid. 105.
cited
Cited "see"
Prince v. United Parcel Service
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1442 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Neal v. Toyota Motor Corp.
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1448 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Shifflett
See United States v. Smith Grading & Paving, Inc., 760 F.2d 527, 532 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert Peter Russell
See United States v. Smith Grading & Paving, Inc., 760 F.2d 527, 532 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Richard Deloach, Cross-Appellant v. Delchamps, Inc., Cross-Appellee. Richard Deloach v. Delchamps, Inc.
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1448-49 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lowe v. Commack Union Free School District
Maxfield, 766 F.2d at 792; see Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1442 (11th Cir.), cert, denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); McCorstin, 621 F.2d at 753-54 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Lowe v. Commack Union Free School District
Maxfield, 766 F.2d at 792 ; see Goldstein v. Manhattan Indus., Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1442 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); McCorstin, 621 F.2d at 753-54 .
cited
Cited "see"
Evans v. Evans
See Ex parte Burlington Northern R.R. , 470 So.2d 1094 , 1095 (Ala. 1985), cert. denied , 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Tolliver v. Leach
See McSurely v. McClellan, 753 F.2d 88, 98 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
George Lamborn, Henry Maringer, and Lamar Commodities, a Partnership v. Thomas H. Dittmer and Dittmer International, Inc.
See United States v. Smith Grading & Paving, Inc., 760 F.2d 527, 531 (4th Cir.) (“Rule 608(b) should not be read so broadly as to disallow the presentation of extrinsic evidence that is probative of a material issue in a case.”), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Dorothy D. STANFIELD, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ANSWERING SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellant
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Indust., Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 , 1448-49 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 1005 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Von Stein v. Brescher
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries, 758 F.2d 1435 , 1447-48 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mansion House Center Redevelopment Co.
Accord McSurely v. McClellan, 697 F.2d 309, 317 (D.C.Cir.1982), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Wayne Chastain v. Don Sundquist
(2×)
See McSurely v. McClellan, 753 F.2d 88, 99-102 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); Walker v. Jones, 733 F.2d 923, 932-33 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1036 , 105 S.Ct. 512 , 83 L.Ed.2d 402 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pearce v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See McSurely v. McClellan, 753 F.2d 88, 110 (D.C.Cir.) (typical Restatement (Second) analysis of grouping contacts and assessing other factors such as each state’s relative experience with issue), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); Dowd v. Calabrese, 589 F.Supp. 1206, 1210-11 (D.D.C.1984) (express reliance on Restatement (Second) rule that applicable defamation law is state where victim’s reputation suffered injury). 9 .
cited
Cited "see"
Ortega v. City of Kansas City, Kansas
See McSurely v. McClellan, 753 F.2d 88, 100 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
43 Fair empl.prac.cas. 504, 43 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,999 Shirley Ann Reynolds v. Clp Corporation, a Corporation
In order to establish a prima facie case of age discrimination through circumstantial evidence, an employee must prove "(1) his membership in a protected class; (2) his discharge; (3) his qualifications for the job; and (4) his replacement by a person outside the protected class." Archambault v. United Computing Systems, Inc., 786 F.2d 1507, 1512 (11th Cir.1986); see Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries, Inc., 758 F.2d 1435, 1442 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Reynolds v. CLP Corp.
In order to establish a prima facie case of age discrimination through circumstantial evidence, an employee must prove “(1) his membership in a protected class; (2) his discharge; (3) his qualifications for the job; and (4) his replacement by a person outside the protected class.” Archambault v. United Computing Systems, Inc., 786 F.2d 1507, 1512 (11th Cir.1986); see Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries, Inc., 758 F.2d 1435, 1442 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Gelof v. Papineau
See Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries, 758 F.2d 1435 (11th Cir.1985), rek’g.den. en banc, 765 F.2d 154 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Gronowicz v. Leonard
Ashley v. Illinois Central Gulf Railroad Co., 98 F.R.D. 722, 724 (S.D.Miss.1983); see McSurely v. McClellan, 753 F.2d 88, 99 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bauer v. Ford Motor Credit Co.
Finally, there is no indication that any facts have been disclosed to those persons with whom the plaintiff has “a special relationship” thereby rendering the disclosure “just as devastating as disclosure to many.” Miller v. Motorola, Inc., 202 Ill.App.3d 976 , 148 Ill.Dec. 303 , 560 N.E.2d 900, 903 (1990); see also McSurely v. McClellan, 753 F.2d 88, 112 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985); Beaumont v. Brown, 401 Mich. 80 , 257 N.W.2d 522, 531 (1977) overruled in part on other grounds by Bradley v. Board of Educ. of Saranac Community Schs., …
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Blackburn v. American Telephone & Telegraph System
See, e.g., Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries, Inc., 758 F.2d 1435 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Ward v. Papa's Pizza to Go, Inc.
See, e.g., Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries, 758 F.2d 1435 , 1449 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Doe v. Methodist Hospital
See Beaumont v. Brown (1977), 401 Mich. 80 , 257 N.W.2d 522, 531 ; Miller v. Motorola, Inc. (1990), 202 Ill. 976 , 148 Ill.Dec. 303, 306 , 560 N.E.2d 900, 903 ; see also McSurely v. McClellan (D.C.Cir.1985), 753 F.2d 88, 112 , cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Ernest Bynum, Jr.
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Smith Grading and Paving, Inc., 760 F.2d 527 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 524 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Carol L. Kirchner GAFFORD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee
Consequently, a litigant has an obligation "to spell out its arguments squarely and distinctly," or else forever hold its peace.' ") (citations omitted); see also Bob Willow Motors, Inc. v. General Motors Corp., 872 F.2d 788, 795 (7th Cir.1989) ("Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 28(a)(4) sets the standard for an appellant's argument, requiring it to 'contain the contentions of the appellant with respect to the issues presented, and the reasons therefor, with citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on.' "). 10 We note that there is some confusion in the case law…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McLaren v. Emory University
See e.g., Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries, Inc., 758 F.2d 1435, 1446 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1978); Kolb v. Goldring, Inc., 694 F.2d 869, 872 (1st Cir.1982); Pfeiffer v. Essex Wire Corp., 682 F.2d 684, 685-88 (7th Cir.1982), cert, denied, 459 U.S. 1039 , 103 S.Ct. 453 , 74 L.Ed.2d 606 (1982); Fiedler v. Indian Truck Line, Inc., 670 F.2d 806, 809-10 (8th Cir.1982); Naton v. Bank of California, 649 F.2d 691, 699 (9th Cir.1981). 6 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Joyce Johnson and Robert Bandy, Administrators of the Estate of Leport Walton, Deceased v. Chapel Hill Independent School District
See e.g., Goldstein v. Manhattan Industries Inc., 758 F.2d 1435, 1449 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1005 , 106 S.Ct. 525 , 88 L.Ed.2d 457 (1985).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
California Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission
v.
Bonneville Power Administration
v.
Bonneville Power Administration
No. 85-179.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 2, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: Ninth Circuit (2) · M.D. Florida (1)
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.