green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 3×
7.8 score
G Cite
cited 2× by 2 distinct cases, last quoted 1991 ·
…test ... is whether or not the statement was manifestly intended or of such character that a jury would naturally and necessarily take it to be a comment on the failure of the accused to testify
⚠ not in text
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 15 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. Charles Allen Lequire, Mike Jenkins, Jerry Allen Lequire, A/K/A Richard Martin, James Thomas Lequire, Robert Lequire, A/K/A Bob Martin, Bonnie Sue Anders, A/K/A Linda Hall, A/K/A Lynn Allen, A/K/A Ann Black, and Harold E. Ward, A/K/A Harold Hall
test ... is whether or not the statement was manifestly intended or of such character that a jury would naturally and necessarily take it to be a comment on the failure of the accused to testify
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
United States v. LeQuire
test ... is whether or not the statement was manifestly intended or of such character that a jury would naturally and necessarily take it to be a comment on the failure of the accused to testify
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Junji Yamamoto v. U.S. Parole Commission, Junji Yamamoto v. U.S. Parole Commission U.S. Attorney General and Joseph S. Petrovsky, Warden, U.S. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners
are not promulgated by any legislature. rather, they are stated policy rules that show how agency discretion is likely to be exercised.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Cruz v. Clark
In Dufresne v. Baer, 744 F.2d 1543 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 5.Ct. 61, 88 L.Ed.2d 49 (1985), the Eleventh Circuit addressed virtually the identical claim presented by petitioner in the case at bar.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Rodney E. Carl Also Known as Timothy Carlos Cain
See United States v. Carrodeguas, 747 F.2d 1390, 1395 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 816 , 106 S.Ct. 60 , 88 L.Ed.2d 49 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gluckstern v. Sutton
(2×)
See Dufresne v. Baer, 744 F.2d 1543, 1547-1550 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 61 , 88 L.Ed.2d 49 (1985); Hayward v. United States Parole Com'n, 659 F.2d 857 (8th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 935 , 102 S.Ct. 1991 , 72 L.Ed.2d 454 (1982); Warren v. United States Parole Commission, 659 F.2d 183, 193 (D.C.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Herman Lee Curry, Haskell Watson, Jr., Jeffrey Lynn Howard, Ronald Jerome Hayes, Adam Butler, Ii, A/K/A Moo Moo, Sam Hayes
See Dufresne v. Baer, 744 F.2d 1543, 1546 (11th Cir.1984) ("An ex post facto law ... is a criminal or penal measure, retrospective, and disadvantageous to the offender because it may impose greater punishment.”) (citations and footnote omitted), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 61 , 88 L.Ed.2d 49 (1985). 6 .The sentencing guidelines went into effect on November 1, 1987.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Clyde E. Wilson, and Stuart Van Eman
See United States v. Carrodeguas, 747 F.2d 1390, 1396 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 816 , 106 S.Ct. 60 , 88 L.Ed.2d 49 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Tittle
See also State v. Watson, 120 Ariz. 441, 448 , 586 P.2d 1253, 1260 (1978), cert. denied, 440 U.S. 924 , 99 S.Ct. 1254 , 59 L.Ed.2d 478 (1978) (Fear of force is an element of robbery and the conviction of robbery presumes that such fear was present); accord, State v. Poland, 144 Ariz. 388, 406 , 698 P.2d 183, 201 (1985), cert. granted, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 60 , 88 L.Ed.2d 49 (1985) (Poland II).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Lazaro Mora, United States of America v. Jose Duarte, United States of America v. Ruben Forcade, United States of America v. Carlos Amador
See also United States v. Carrodeguas, 747 F.2d 1390, 1395 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 816 , 106 S.Ct. 60 , 88 L.Ed.2d 49 (1985); United States v. Rochan, 563 F.2d 1246, 1249 (5th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Mora
See also United States v. Carrodeguas, 747 F.2d 1390, 1395 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 816 , 106 S.Ct. 60 , 88 L.Ed. 2d 49 (1985); United States v. Rochan, 563 F.2d 1246, 1249 (5th Cir.1977).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States ex rel. S.C.I. Construction Co. v. Gajic
See also United States v. Avanti Constructors, Inc., 750 F.2d 759 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied sub nom., Harvis Construction, Inc. v. United States, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 60 , 88 L.Ed.2d 49 (1985); United States v. Neosho Construction Co., 599 F.2d 930 (10th Cir.1979); United States v. Cortelyou & Cole, Inc., 581 F.2d 239 (9th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
US FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF SCI CONST. CO., INC. v. Gajic
See also United States v. Avanti Constructors, Inc., 750 F.2d 759 (9th Cir.1984), cert. denied sub nom., Harvis Construction, Inc. v. United States, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 60 , 88 L.Ed.2d 49 (1985); United States v. Neosho Construction Co., 599 F.2d 930 (10th Cir.1979); United States v. Cortelyou & Cole, Inc., 581 F.2d 239 (9th Cir.1978).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Yamamoto v. U.S. Parole Commission
See, e.g., Dufresne v. Baer, 744 F.2d 1543, 1549-50 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 61 , 88 L.Ed.2d 49 (1985) ("[The guidelines] are not promulgated by any legislature.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Fontaine
(2×)
See also, State v. Poland, 144 Ariz. 388 , 698 P.2d 183 (1985), cert. granted, U.S. , 106 S.Ct. 60 , 88 L.Ed.2d 49 (1985); People v. McDonald, 37 Cal.3d 351 , 208 Cal.Rptr. 236 , 690 P.2d 709 (1984); State v. Ammons, 208 Neb. 797 , 305 N.W.2d 812 (1981); Hampton v. State, 92 Wis.2d 450 , 285 N.W.2d 868 (1979).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Poland
v.
Arizona and Poland v. Arizona
v.
Arizona and Poland v. Arizona
No. 85-5023; No. 85-5024.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1985.
Published
Citer courts: Eleventh Circuit (2) · Eighth Circuit (1)
Sup. Ct. Ariz. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted in No. 85-5023 limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. Certiorari granted in No. 85-5024. Cases consolidated and a total of one hour allotted for oral argument. Reported below: No. 85-5023, 144 Ariz. 388, 698 P. 2d 183; No. 85-5024, 144 Ariz. 412, 698 P. 2d 207.