green
Positive treatment
7.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1985 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1985
2005
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 36 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
United States v. Sims
Harmon said that Gilliam initially worked in the “drug spots” but later gained promotion to “The Table.” Id., at 91.
discussed
Cited "see"
Evans v. Atwood
See Krodel v. Young, 748 F.2d 701, 706 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985); see also Coburn v. Pan American World Airways, Inc., 711 F.2d 339, 342 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 994 , 104 S.Ct. 488 , 78 L.Ed.2d 683 (1983) (stating that the plaintiff “at all times retains the burden of persuasion”).
cited
Cited "see"
Sisay v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
See Krodel v. Young, 748 F.2d 701, 707 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Paul Paquin v. Federal National Mortgage Association
See Krodel v. Young, 748 F.2d 701, 709 (D.C.Cir.1984) (employer’s failure to follow own procedures probative of discrimination), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985); Johnson v. Lehman, 679 F.2d 918, 922 (D.C.Cir.1982) (same).
discussed
Cited "see"
Rogers v. CITY OF TROY NEW YORK
FLSA regulations “constitute a body of experience and informed judgment to which courts and litigants may properly resort for guidance.” Skidmore v. Swift & Co., 323 U.S. 134, 140 , 65 S.Ct. 161, 164 , 89 L.Ed. 124 (1944); see Hill v. United States, 751 F.2d 810, 813 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied Cummings v. United States, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Reich v. Southern New England Telecommunications Corp.
See Hill v. United States, 751 F.2d 810, 814 (6th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Timothy Wayne Morrow (89-5418/5708) and George Mooneyham (89-5710)
(2×)
See United States v. Noble, 754 F.2d 1324, 1331 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985) (holding that counterfeiting is a crime of dishonesty and false statement under Rule 609(a)(2)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Lamon v. City Of Shawnee
See Hill v. United States, 751 F.2d 810, 813 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, Cummings v. United States, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985) 8 If an employer chooses not to avail itself of the advantages available under the subsection, that does not mean its selection of the alternative regime did not really occur, as Plaintiff would have this court hold.
cited
Cited "see"
Lamon v. City of Shawnee
See Hill v. United States, 751 F.2d 810, 813 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, Cummings v. United States, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985). .
cited
Cited "see"
Welsing v. Government of the District of Columbia
See Krodel v. Young, 748 F.2d 701, 706 (D.C.Cir.1984), cert. denied 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Timothy Wayne Morrow (89-5418/5708), George Mooneyham (89-5710)
(2×)
See United States v. Noble, 754 F.2d 1324 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985); Kaye v. United States, 177 F. 147 (7th Cir.1910).
cited
Cited "see"
Riggs v. United States
See Hill v. United States, 751 F.2d 810, 814 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985). .
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Phillip Grandinetti, Jr.
See United States v. Noble, 754 F.2d 1324 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985); United States v. Tanner, 471 F.2d 128 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 949 , 93 S.Ct. 269 , 34 L.Ed.2d 220 (1972).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gabriel Alvarez, Gustavo Holguin, Leovigilda Rivera, Humberto Olivares Castrellon and Oneyda Zambrana
(2×)
See United States v. Noble, 754 F.2d 1324, 1330 (7th Cir.) (generally, there can be no prejudice if defendant participated in both of two distinct conspiracies proved at trial), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mena
See United States v. Benz, 740 F.2d 903, 910-11 (11th Cir.1984) (discussing Fifth Circuit pattern jury charge for conspiracy), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
Brock v. Claridge Hotel and Casino
See Hill v. United States, 751 F.2d 810, 814 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 reh’g denied, 474 U.S. 1014 , 106 S.Ct. 547 , 88 L.Ed.2d 476 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Richard Guzzino and Robert Ciarrocchi
See United States v. Noble, 754 F.2d 1324, 1332 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Bryant Jones, Curtis Young, and Donnis Glen Humphrey
Id. at 1399 ; see United States v. Noble, 754 F.2d 1324, 1332 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Lerchenstein
See United States v. Lavelle, 751 F.2d 1266, 1278 (D.C.Cir.) cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Charles Carter v. District of Columbia, Maurice Turner, Chief, Metropolitan Police Department Charles Carter v. District of Columbia
The Advisory Committee Notes continue: “The availability of other means of proof may also be an appropriate factor.” Id.; accord United States v. LaVelle, 751 F.2d 1266, 1278 (D.C.Cir.) (taking into account whether “the manner in which the government presented the evidence guarded against unfair prejudice”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985); United States v. Foskey, supra, 636 F.2d at 524 n. 6.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Loren Levine
See United States v. Noble, 754 F.2d 1324, 1333 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Anthony J. Peters, Lawrence Peters, and Jacek Odoner
(2×)
Accord United States v. Noble, 754 F.2d 1324, 1332 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
McGrath v. City of Philadelphia
See, e.g., Hill v. United States, 751 F.2d 810, 814 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Spinks v. McBride
See also United States v. Noble, 754 F.2d 1324, 1333 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985); United States ex rel.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Samuel C. Stoia v. United States
See also United States v. Noble, 754 F.2d 1324, 1333 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985); United States ex rel.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Browning v. State
See also United States v. Noble , 754 F.2d 1324 , 1333 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985); United States v. Bradshaw , 719 F.2d 907 , 911 (7th Cir. 1983). ' "[I]t would be fitting and appropriate for [a waiver] to appear upon the record.' " Cuyler , 446 U.S. at 351 , 100 S.Ct. at 1720 .
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Antonio Ramon Washington, United States of America v. Carl Gedde
See, e.g., United States v. Lavelle, 751 F.2d 1266, 1277 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.s. 817, 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Sonia Jacobs A/K/A Sonia Linder v. Harry K. Singletary, Marta Villacorta and Jim Smith
See, e.g., United States v. Benz, 740 F.2d 903, 915-16 (11th Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985) (no Brady violation where evidence would have provided additional support for cross examination but same information substantially otherwise presented to jury).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Leahy v. City of Chicago
See, e.g., Hill v. United States, 751 F.2d 810 (6th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Owens
See also United States v. Adams, 799 F.2d 665, 671 (11th Cir.1986) (when district court withdraws evidence from the jury with an instruction to disregard it, “ ‘the error is cured unless the evidence is so highly prejudicial as to render the error incurable’ ”) (quoting United States v. Benz, 740 F.2d 903, 916 (11th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985)), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1070 , 107 S.Ct. 2464 , 95 L.Ed.2d 873 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Kojo Sababu, Jaime Delgado, and Dora Garcia
See e.g., United States v. Noble, 754 F.2d 1324, 1328 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985); United States v. Madison, 689 F.2d 1300, 1310 (7th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1117 , 103 S.Ct. 754 , 74 L.Ed.2d 971 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Joseph C. Spagnola, Jr. v. William Mathis, Office of Management and Budget, Joseph C. Spagnola v. William Mathis, Joseph C. Spagnola, Jr. v. William Mathis, Office of Management & Budget Michael E. Hubbard v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Administrator
Turner v. McIntosh, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 2861 , 101 L.Ed.2d 898 (1988); Kotarski v. Cooper, 799 F.2d 1342, 1348-49 (9th Cir.1986) (holding that probationary employee could pursue Bivens action against supervisor), vacated, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 2861 , 101 L.Ed.2d 897 (1988); see also Krodel v. Young, 748 F.2d 701 , 712 n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1984) (suggesting in dictum that statutory right to petition OSC, without more, would not preclude a Bivens claim for damages), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985); Note, Bivens Doctrine in Flux: Statutory Preclusion of a Constit…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Spagnola v. Mathis
Turner v. McIntosh, — U.S.-, 108 S.Ct. 2861 , 101 L.Ed.2d 898 (1988); Kotarski v. Cooper, 799 F.2d 1342, 1348-49 (9th Cir.1986) (holding that probationary employee could pursue Bivens action against supervisor), vacated, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 2861 , 101 L.Ed.2d 897 (1988); see also Krodel v. Young, 748 F.2d 701 , 712 n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1984) (suggesting in dictum that statutory right to petition OSC, without more, would not preclude a Bivens claim for damages), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985); Note, Bivens Doctrine in Flux: Statutory Preclusion of a Constitutional…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Arakawa v. Reagan
In Bush , the Supreme Court noted that "Constitutional challenges to agency action, such as the First Amendment claims raised by petitioner, are fully cognizable within [the CSRA] system.” 462 U.S. at 386 , 103 S.Ct. at 2415 ; see also Krodel v. Young, 748 F.2d 701, 712 (D.C.Cir.1984), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 817 , 106 S.Ct. 62 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985) (opportunity for MSPB and Federal Circuit review provides "meaningful remedies” for First Amendment violation); 5 U.S.C. § 7701 (c)(2)(C) (MSPB may reverse any agency decision "not in accordance with law’’); cf. Rose v. Dep't of Health an…
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jorge Serna and Steven John Cinnante
See, e.g., United States v. Noble, 754 F.2d 1324, 1331 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Bueno v. Mattner
Compare Hill v. United States, 751 F.2d 810, 814-15 (6th Cir.1984) (infrequent and minimal interruptions during lunch period are subject to de minimis doctrine), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 63 , 88 L.Ed.2d 51 (1985); Lindow v. United States, 738 F.2d 1057, 1062-64 (9th Cir. 1984) (daily periods of approximately ten minutes found to be de minimis).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Krodel
v.
Young, Associate Commissioner, Office of Hearings and Appeals, Social Security Administration
v.
Young, Associate Commissioner, Office of Hearings and Appeals, Social Security Administration
No. 84-1642.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Oct 7, 1985.
Published
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.