green
Positive treatment
10.9 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
examined
Cited as authority (rule)
Zipperer v. City of Fort Myers
(3×)
also: Cited "see"
Id. at 616.
discussed
Cited as authority (rule)
Davis Oil Company v. William P. Mills, Iii, William P. Mills, III v. Davis Oil Company
(2×)
The court found that the equity of redemption is defined by Alabama law to exist' only up to the moment when the mortgagee exercises the power of sale and concluded that “[b]ecause foreclosure and the equity of redemption cannot overlap, it is impossible that this foreclosure infringed on Morrison’s right.” Id. at 615.
discussed
Cited "see"
Abed v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
See DiNapoli v. Northeast Regional Parole Commission, 764 F.2d 143, 146 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S. Ct. 568 , 88 L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Gross Common Carrier, Inc. v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation
(2×)
See Exemption of Motor Contract Carriers from Tariff Filing Requirements, 133 M.C.C. 150 (1983), aff'd, Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n, Inc. v. United States, 757 F.2d 301 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gross Common Carrier, Inc. v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
(2×)
See Exemption of Motor Contract Carriers from Tariff Filing Requirements, 133 M.C.C. 150 (1983), aff'd, Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass’n, Inc. v. United States, 757 F.2d 301 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Trans-Allied Audit Company, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, United States of America, Twin Modal, Inc., Intervenor
(2×)
Carriers can provide common carriage or contract carriage or both. 49 U.S.C. §§ 10921-10923 ; see Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass’n v. United States, 244 U.S.App.D.C. 226 , 757 F.2d 301 (describing regulatory history of motor common and contract carriage), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Rodgers
(2×)
See United States v. Lacayo, 758 F.2d 1559, 1566 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S, 1019, 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Household Goods Forwarders Tariff Bureau v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America
(2×)
See generally Central & S. Motor Freight Tariff Ass ’n v. United States, 757 F.2d 301, 309-12 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Covey v. ConAgra, Inc.
(2×)
Servs., Inc., 955 F.2d 529, 533 (8th Cir.1992) (footnote omitted); see Exemption of Motor Contract Carriers from Tariff Filing Requirements, 133 M.C.C. 150 (1983), aff'd sub nom., Central & S. Motor Freight Tariff Ass’n v. United States, 757 F.2d 301 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
examined
Cited "see"
Bankruptcy Estate of United Shipping Co. v. Tucker Co.
(4×)
See Central & S. Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n v. United States, 757 F.2d 301, 330 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
Advance-United Expressways, Inc. v. Beeler Distributing Co.
(2×)
See Cent. & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass’n v. United States, 757 F.2d 301, 330 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985); 49 U.S.C. § 10761 (b).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Edward J. Elkins
(2×)
See United States v. Lacayo, 758 F.2d 1559, 1562-63 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985) (agreement granting leniency to witness must be reached prior to trial to be subject to disclosure).
discussed
Cited "see"
Frazier v. State
(2×)
See United States v. Lacayo , 758 F.2d 1559 , 1563 (11th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985) (wherein the court held that "[t]o warrant a new trial, the agreement of leniency [or any 'deal' made between the witness and the government] must have been reached prior to the witness's testimony," quoting United States v. Ramirez , 608 F.2d 1261 , 1266 (9th Cir. 1979)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Public Citizen v. Federal Trade Commission
(2×)
See Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass’n v. United States, 757 F.2d 301, 312 (D.C.Cir.1985) (quoting Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. at 511 , 95 S.Ct. at 2211 ) (noting that the requirement of injury in fact for organizational standing is satisfied if the association’s members, " ‘or any one of them, are suffering immediate or threatened injury as a result of the challenged action[’]” (emphasis added by the Central & Southern court)), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985). 18 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Regular Common Carrier Conference v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Haslerig Trucking Company, Inc., Intervenor. Regular Common Carrier Conference v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Deaton, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission
(2×)
See Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n v. United States, 757 F.2d 301, 325 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ---, 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985). 9 Contract carriage and common carriage were distinguished originally in the Motor Carrier Act of 1935, Pub.L.
discussed
Cited "see"
Regular Common Carrier Conference v. United States
(2×)
See Central & Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass’n v. United States, 757 F.2d 301, 325 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Steven Sawyer, Harvey M. Bloch, Allen C. Leavitt
(2×)
See United States v. Lacayo, 758 F.2d 1559, 1564 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rios v. Commissioner of Correction
(2×)
Such guidelines are not laws within the meaning of the ex post facto clause.’’ (Citation omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) Id., 171 ; see also DiNapoli v. Northeast Regional Parole Commission, 764 F.2d 143 , 145–46 (2d Cir.) (federal parole guidelines, promulgated to assist parole commis- sion in its exercise of discretion and under which com- mission remained free to recommend parole date above or below guidelines while retaining discretion to revise or modify guidelines at any time, did not constitute laws within meaning of ex post facto clause), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 ,…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Barna v. Travis
(2×)
See, e.g., DiNapoli v. Northeast Regional Parole Commission, 764 F.2d 143, 145-47 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1020 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Larry Gene Eirven
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Lacayo, 758 F.2d 1559, 1564-65 (11th Cir.) (not improper for prosecutor to tell jury “[wjhat you are about to hear is a true story," though he should have made clear this was only government’s theory), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985); United States v. Molina, 934 F.2d 1440, 1445 (9th Cir.1991) (prosecutor told jury, as if it were a fact, that defendant lied, but this should be interpreted only as argument that jury ought not believe defendant); United States v. Tipton, 964 F.2d 650, 655-56 (7th Cir.1992) (prosecutor told jury …
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
American Postal Workers Union, Afl-Cio v. United States Postal Service
(4×)
See, e.g., Central Southern Motor Freight Tariff Ass'n v. United States, 757 F.2d 301, 314-15 (D.C.Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1019 , 106 S.Ct. 568 , 88 L.Ed.2d 553 (1985) (describing the Interstate Commerce Commission's broad authority to allow certain exemptions when in the "public interest" as "a congressional charge to 'go forth and do good' ").
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Morrison
v.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
v.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
No. 85-251.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Dec 9, 1985.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.