green
Positive treatment
9.0 score
Treatment trajectory · 1980 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1980
2003
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 25 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Harvey v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
(2×)
See Uviedo v. Steves Sash & Door Co., 738 F.2d 1425, 1428 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1054 , 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986) (citing McDonnell Douglas Corp., 411 U.S. at 802 , 93 S.Ct. at 1824 ); Page v. United States Indus., Inc., 726 F.2d 1038 , 1055 (5th Cir.1984); see also Lindsey v. Prive Corp., 987 F.2d 324, 326-27 (5th Cir.1993).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. John Pozsgai, Gizella Pozsgai, Mercer Wrecking & Recycling Corporation, J. Vinch & Sons, Inc. John Pozsgai and Gizella Pozsgai
(2×)
See Quivira Mining Co. v. United States E.P.A., 765 F.2d 126, 130 (10th Cir.1985) (non-navigable creeks and “arroyos” affect interstate commerce because during times of “intense rainfall” there could be a surface connection between these waterways and navigable streams), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1055 , 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986); United States v. Ashland Oil and Transportation Co., 504 F.2d 1317, 1329 (6th Cir.1974) (Act constitutionally applies to discharge of oil into non-navigable tributary three waterways removed from navigable river).
discussed
Cited "see"
Yamaha Corporation of America v. United States of America
(2×)
See generally Vivitar Corp. v. United States, 761 F.2d 1552, 1566-67 (Fed.Cir.1985) (recounting history of Customs’s regulation), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1055 , 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986). 6 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Leslie Salt Co., a Delaware Corporation v. United States of America, and Save San Francisco Bay Association, a Non-Profit California Corporation National Audubon Society, a Non-Profit New York Corporation, Defendant-Intervenors-Appellants. United States of America v. Leslie Salt Co., a Delaware Corporation and Cargill, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
(2×)
See Quivira Mining Co. v. EPA, 765 F.2d 126, 130 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1055 , 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986); United States v. Phelps Dodge Corp., 391 F.Supp. 1181, 1187 (D.Ariz.1975). 31 The Corps' determination that the crystallizers and calcium chloride pits are similarly seasonal bodies of water within the meaning of the regulations is proper.
discussed
Cited "see"
Leslie Salt Co. v. United States
(2×)
See Quivira Mining Co. v. EPA, 765 F.2d 126, 130 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1055 , 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986); United States v. Phelps Dodge Corp., 391 F.Supp. 1181, 1187 (D.Ariz.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
Carey v. Rudeseal
(2×)
See Uviedo v. Steves Sash & Door Co., 753 F.2d 369, 370-73 (5th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1054 , 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Maven, Inc. v. McCauley
(2×)
See Vivitar Corp. v. United States, 761 F.2d 1552, 1560 (Fed.Cir.1985), *304 cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1055 , 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986); contra Olympus Corp. v. United States, 792 F.2d 315 (2d Cir.1986), petition for cert. filed, 55 U.S. L.W. 3372 (U.S. Nov. 6, 1986) (No. 85-757); Coalition to Preserve the Integrity of American Trademarks v. United States (COPIAT), 790 F.2d 903 (D.C.Cir.1986), cert. granted, — U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 642 , 93 L.Ed.2d 699 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Harris v. Marsh
(2×)
See Uviedo v. Steves Sash & Door Co., 738 F.2d 1425, 1429 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1054 , 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1984).
discussed
Cited "see"
Original Appalachian Artworks, Inc. v. Granada Electronics, Inc.
(2×)
Olympus Corp. v. United States, 792 F.2d 315, 320 (2d Cir.1986), petition for cert. filed, 55 U.S.L.W. 3372 (U.S. Nov. 6, 1986) (No. 86-757); accord Vivitar Corp. v. United States, 761 F.2d 1552, 1569-70 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
In The Matter Of Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul And Pacific Railroad Company
(2×)
See Simmons v. ICC, 760 F.2d 126, 128-29 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986), for a compact description.
discussed
Cited "see"
Seaboard System Railroad v. United States
(2×)
See Simmons v. ICC, 760 F.2d 126, 128-29 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986), for a compact description.
discussed
Cited "see"
M.W. Kasch Co. v. United States
(2×)
See generally Vivitar Corporation v. United States, 8 C.I.T. 109 , 593 F.Supp. 420 (1984), aff'd, 761 F.2d 1552 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Railway Labor Executives' Association v. United States
(2×)
As the Seventh Circuit recently noted in reaching the same conclusion, "[a]gainst this background, the silence of section 10905 on the matter of conditions has a certain eloquence, especially when we consider the active participation of the railroad unions in revisions of the Interstate Commerce Act." Simmons v. I.C.C., 760 F.2d 126, 130 (7th Cir.1985) ("Simmons I "), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (U.S.1986); accord Simmons v. I.C.C., 766 F.2d 1177 (7th Cir.1985) ("Simmons II "), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (U.S.1986). 32 RLEA's att…
discussed
Cited "see"
Railway Labor Executives' Ass'n v. United States
(2×)
As the Seventh Circuit recently noted in reaching the same conclusion, “[a]gainst this background, the silence of section 10905 on the matter of conditions has a certain eloquence, especially when we consider the active participation of the railroad unions in revisions of the Interstate Commerce Act.” Simmons v. I.C.C., 760 F.2d 126, 130 (7th Cir.1985) (“Simmons I”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (U.S.1986); accord Simmons v. I.C.C., 766 F.2d 1177 (7th Cir.1985) (“Simmons II”), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (U.S.1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
FD & P Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Army Corps of Engineers
(2×)
See, e.g., Quivira Mining Co. v. EPA, 765 F.2d 126 (10th Cir.1985) cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1055 , 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986); United States v. TGR Corp., 171 F.3d 762 (2d Cir.1999); Conant v. United States, 786 F.2d 1008 (11th Cir.1986) (all holding that the CWA authorized the Corps to regulate wetlands adjacent to non-navigable tributaries of navigable waters).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Rice v. Harken Exploration Co.
(2×)
See, e.g., Quivira Mining Co. v. ERA, 765 F.2d 126, 130 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1055 , 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986)(holding that non-navigable creeks and arroyos are covered by the CWA where intense rainfall could create surface connections with navigable streams); United States v. Ashland Oil and Transp.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Charles A. Eidson, Sandra A. Eidson
(2×)
Id.; see also Quivira Mining Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 765 F.2d 126, 130 (10th Cir.1985) (upholding regulation because “during times of intense rainfall, there can be a surface connection” between tributary and navigable-in-fact streams), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1055 , 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986); United States v. Phelps Dodge Corp., 391 F.Supp. 1181, 1187 (D.Ariz.1975) (“waters of the United States” include “normally dry arroyos” from which water could flow to public waters).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Eidson
(2×)
Id.; see also Quivira Mining Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 765 F.2d 126, 130 (10th Cir.1985) (upholding regulation because "during times of intense rainfall, there can be a surface connection" between tributary and navigable-in-fact streams), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1055 , 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986); United States v. Phelps Dodge Corp., 391 F.Supp. 1181, 1187 (D.Ariz.1975) ("waters of the United States" include "normally dry arroyos" from which water could flow to public waters).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
International Labor Rights Education & Research Fund v. Bush
(2×)
See, e.g., Vivitar Corp. v. United States, 761 F.2d 1552 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1055 , 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
52 Fair empl.prac.cas. 71, 52 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 39,662 Increase Minority Participation by Affirmative Change Today of Northwest Florida, Inc. (Impact), on Behalf of Itself and Its Members, Diann Walker, Louvenia Jones, Pearlie Williams, Gracie Holton, Rosa Henderson, Delores Colston, Charles Stewart, Barbara King, Dorothy Roberts, Jacqueline Ross, Linda Issac, Intervenors-Appellants, and Clifford Simmons, Marguerite Stewart v. George Firestone, as Secretary of the State of Florida, State of Florida, Increase Minority Participation by Affirmative Change Today of Northwest Florida, Inc. (Impact), on Behalf of Itself and Its Members, Diann Walker, Louvenia Jones, Pearlie Williams, Gracie Holton, Rosa Henderson, Delores Colston, Charles Stewart, Barbara King, and Dorothy Roberts, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated, Clifford Simmons and Marguerite Stewart, Jacqueline Ross and Linda Issac, Intervenors-Appellants v. George Firestone, as Secretary of State of the State of Florida, and State of Florida
(2×)
This, of course, means that the plaintiff must be given a fair opportunity to cross-examine the defendant's witnesses as to the actual reason which is testified to. 33 As pointed out above, the record does disclose that at least in some of the claims of some of the intervenors, the black applicant either had more seniority, more general education, or more experience on the particular job than the person who was given the position, but such claimant was not given the opportunity to rebut the claim of the State that the selectee was better "qualified" because no witness testified to the particul…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Increase Minority Participation by Affirmative Change Today of Northwest Florida, Inc. v. Firestone
(2×)
This Court has expressly held that under Burdine , there must be “evidence that asserted reasons for discharge were actually relied on” or “the reasons are not sufficient to meet defendant’s rebuttal burden.” Lee v. Russell County Board of Education, 684 F.2d 769 , 775 (11th Cir.1982) (citing Tanner v. McCall, 625 F.2d 1183 , 1195 n. 21 (5th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 907 , 101 S.Ct. 1975 , 68 L.Ed.2d 295 (1981)); see also Uviedo v. Steves Sash & Door Co., 738 F.2d 1425, 1429 (5th Cir. 1984), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1054 , 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Hennepin County v. Bowen
(2×)
See, e.g., Humana, Inc. v. Heckler, 758 F.2d 696, 699 (D.C.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1055 , 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986); Villa View Community Hospital v. Heckler, 728 F.2d 539 , 543 (D.C.Cir.1984); Richey Manor, Inc. v. Schweiker, 684 F.2d 130, 134 (D.C.Cir.1982).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Texas Municipal Power Agency v. Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
(2×)
See, e.g., Quivira Mining Co. v. EPA, 765 F.2d 126, 129-30 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1055 , 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986); Deltona Corp. v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 476 , 657 F.2d 1184, 1186 (1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1017 , 102 S.Ct. 1712 , 72 L.Ed.2d 135 (1982); United States v. Byrd, 609 F.2d 1204, 1209 (7th Cir.1979); United States v. Earth Sciences, Inc., 599 F.2d 368, 373 (10th Cir.1979); Leslie Salt Co. v. Froehlke, 578 F.2d 742, 755 (9th Cir.1978); United States v. Ashland Oil and Transportation Co., 504 F.2d 1317, 1325 (6th Cir.1974).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
NEC Electronics v. CAL Circuit Abco
(2×)
Compare Olympus (upholding the regulations) and Vivitar Corp. v. United States, 761 F.2d 1552 (Fed.Cir.1985) (five-judge panel) (same), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986), with Coalition to Preserve the Integrity of Am.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Nec Electronics, Plaintiff/counter-Defendant/appellee v. Cal Circuit Abco, Alex Sandel, Jason Barzilay, Benny Alagem, Defendant/counter- Claimant/appellant. Nec Electronics, Inc., Plaintiff/counter-Defendant/appellee v. Alex Sandel, Jason Barzilay, Benny Alagem, Maury Friedman, Nec Corporation and Nec Electronics, Inc., Counter-Defendant, and Cal Circuit Abco, Inc., AKA Cal-Abco, Defendant/counter-Claimant/appellant
(2×)
Compare Olympus (upholding the regulations) and Vivitar Corp. v. United States, 761 F.2d 1552 (Fed.Cir.1985) (five-judge panel) (same), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 791 , 88 L.Ed.2d 769 (1986), with Coalition to Preserve the Integrity of Am.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Simmons
v.
Interstate Commerce Commission (two cases)
v.
Interstate Commerce Commission (two cases)
No. 85-438.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 13, 1986.
Published
C. A. 7th Cir. Certiorari denied.