green
Positive treatment
8.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 26 distinct citers.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Gray
(2×)
See DeLong, 790 F.Supp. at 617 , citing United States v. Goodwin, 770 F.2d 631 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 858 , 88 L.Ed.2d 897 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Thomas
See Lord, 123 Wn.2d at 317 (citing United States v. Goodwin, 770 F.2d 631, 637 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 (1986)).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Thomas
See Lord, 123 Wash.2d at 317 , 868 P.2d 835 (citing United States v. Goodwin, 770 F.2d 631, 637 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 858 , 88 L.Ed.2d 897 (1986)).
cited
Cited "see"
Sarah M. Persley v. Pacific Bell Directory
See Sakellar v. Lockheed Missiles & Space Co., 765 F.2d 1453, 1455 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Matthew Gootee
Id.; see United States v. Goodwin, 770 F.2d 631, 639 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 858 , 88 L.Ed.2d 897 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Ana Marin De Velasquez
See United States v. Pruitt, 763 F.2d 1256, 1261-62 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 856 , 88 L.Ed.2d 896 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Personal Restraint of Lord
(2×)
See United States v. Goodwin, 770 F.2d 631, 637 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Wright
“A motion for a new trial is not favored and is viewed with great caution.” United States v. Miller, 987 F.2d 1462, 1466 (10th Cir.1993); see United States v. Goodwin, 770 F.2d 631, 639 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 858 , 88 L.Ed.2d 897 (1986); United States v. Clemons, 658 F.Supp. 1116, 1119 (W.D.Pa.1987) (“[T]he power to grant a new trial should be exercised sparingly.”), aff'd, 843 F.2d 741 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 835 , 109 S.Ct. 97 , 102 L.Ed.2d 73 (1988).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. William Q. Cochran
(2×)
See id. at 44-46 (citing United States v. Pruitt, 763 F.2d 1256 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 856 , 88 L.Ed.2d 896 (1986)).
discussed
Cited "see"
Klein v. Secretary of Transportation
See Sakellar v. Lockheed Missiles and Space Co., 765 F.2d 1453, 1456-57 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 856 , 88 L.Ed.2d 896 (1986); Coopersmith v. Roudebush, 517 F.2d 818, 823 (D.C.Cir.1975).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Thomas L. O'Neil
See United States v. Goodwin, 770 F.2d 631, 638 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 858 (1986) (no reversible error when "evidence presented in rebuttal could have been introduced in the government's case in chief, and [defendant] was allowed to present witnesses in surrebuttal to counter the government's rebuttal case").
discussed
Cited "see"
United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. John Manuel Williams and Eric Demitries Patt, Defendants-Appellants/cross-Appellees
See United States v. Goodwin, 770 F.2d 631, 635 (7th Cir.1985) (whether to authorize investigative services is within the discretion of the court), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 858 , 88 L.Ed.2d 897 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Samuel J. Davis, Jr.
See id. (upholding the denial of a request for an investigator where an explanation of why the services were needed was not provided). 31 Davis also complains that the admission of certain documents under the business records exception to the hearsay rule, Fed.R.Evid. 803(6), violated his rights guaranteed by the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Albert Harris, A/K/A Bert, Lloyd Frink, Steven Bucchiere, Philip Cardilli, A/K/A Shaver, Jesus Haim, A/K/A Waterbucket, Alp Martin
See United States v. Pruitt, 763 F.2d 1256, 1263 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 856 , 88 L.Ed.2d 896 (1986). 49 In United States v. DeSimone, 660 F.2d 532 (5th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 1027 , 102 S.Ct. 1732 , 72 L.Ed.2d 149 (1982), the defendant similarly attempted to satisfy the criteria for severance set out in Byrd through an affidavit.
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Harris
See United States v. Pruitt, 763 F.2d 1256, 1263 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 856 , 88 L.Ed.2d 896 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Terry H. Phillips
See United States v. Goodwin, 770 F.2d 631, 635 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 (1986). 8 A court should authorize an independent psychiatric evaluation under Sec. 3006A(e) "in circumstances in which a reasonable defense attorney would engage such services for a client having the independent financial means to pay for them." United States v. Alden, 767 F.2d 314, 318 (7th Cir.1984).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Gerald Levy (89-5980) and Calvin Black (89-6099)
See United States v. *1032 Goodwin, 770 F.2d 631, 638 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 858 , 88 L.Ed.2d 897 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Gay
See Dodson v. Cooper, 705 P.2d 500, 502 (Colo. 1985), cert, denied, 474 U.S. 1084 (1986). 6 Finally, both statutes must be construed in light of, and harmonized with, the extradition clause of the Federal Constitution, U.S. Const., art.
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Coker
See United States v. Goodwin, 770 F.2d 631, 635 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 858 , 88 L.Ed.2d 897 (1986); United States v. Durant, 545 F.2d 823, 827 (2d Cir.1976); United States v. Hartfield, 513 F.2d 254, 257 (9th Cir.1975); United States v. Theriault, 440 F.2d 713, 717 (5th Cir.1971) (Wisdom, C.J., concurring); Schultz, 431 F.2d at 911 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Levy, Unpublished Decision (8-26-2004)
Specifically, Article IV provides in part: "(a) The appropriate officer of the jurisdiction in which an untried indictment, information or complaint is pending shall be entitled to have a prisoner against whom he has lodged a detainer and who is serving a term of imprisonment in any party state made available in accordance with Article V(a) hereof upon presentation of a written request for temporary custody or availability to the appropriate authorities of the state in which the prisoner is incarcerated[.] * * * "(b) Upon receipt of the officer's written request as provided in paragraph (a) he…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Jackson
See also, U.S. v. Pruitt, 763 F.2d 1256, 1261-62 (11th Cir.1985) ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 856 , 88 L.Ed.2d 896 (1986) (knowledge of minor’s age is not an element of violation of 21 U.S.C. § 845 -now § 859-prohibiting distribution of drugs to persons under the age of 21, citing analogous statutes).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Paul Dana Williams, A/K/A Paul William Dana
See, e.g., United States v. Goodwin, 770 F.2d 631, 635 (7th Cir. 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 858 , 88 L.Ed.2d 897 (1986); United States v. Alden, 767 F.2d 314, 318-19 (7th Cir. 1984); United States v. Hamlet, 480 F.2d 556, 557 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1026 , 94 S.Ct. 452 , 38 L.Ed.2d 317 (1973) (per curiam). 11 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
McKinney v. Paskett
See, e.g., United States v. Goodwin, 770 F.2d 631, 634 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 858 , 88 L.Ed.2d 897 (1986) (ex parte proceeding not required where defendant’s request failed to indicate why an investigator was necessary, what investigator would do, and why attorney could not perform the investigative work needed).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sanchez, Appeal of Hilario Moya
However, since a defendant requesting public funds pursuant to § 3006A(e) has the burden of satisfying the district court that the services are reasonably necessary, he “must articulate a reasonable basis for [the requested services].” United States v. Norwood, 798 F.2d 1094, 1100 (7th Cir.) (investigator to find witness), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1011 , 107 S.Ct. 656 , 93 L.Ed.2d 711 (1986); see, e.g., United States v. Goodwin, 770 F.2d 631, 634-35 (7th Cir.1985) (unspecified investigative services), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 858 , 88 L.Ed.2d 897 (1986); see also United Stat…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
People v. Bost
United States v. Mauro, 436 U.S. 340, 343 , 98 S.Ct. 1834, 1839 , 56 L.Ed.2d 329 (1978) (writ of habeas corpus ad prose-quendum, by which the United States obtains custody of state prisoners, is not a detainer and therefore does not trigger the application of the IAD); People v. Newton, 764 P.2d at 1186 ; see also Dodson v. Cooper, 705 P.2d 500, 502 (Colo.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 857 , 88 *1215 L.Ed.2d 896; People v. Yellen, 704 P.2d at 311 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Lusardi v. Xerox Corp.
See, e.g., Sakellar v. Lockheed Missiles and Space Co., 765 F.2d 1453 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1084 , 106 S.Ct. 856 , 88 L.Ed.2d 896 (1986); Leftwich v. Harris-Stowe State College, 702 F.2d 686 (8th Cir.1983); Allison v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 680 F.2d 1318 (11th Cir.1982); Getter v. Markham, 635 F.2d 1027 (2d Cir.1980), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 945 , 101 S.Ct. 2028 , 68 L.Ed.2d 332 (1981).
Brown
v.
Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
v.
Wainwright, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
No. 85-5600.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 21, 1986.
Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.