green
Positive treatment
5.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 22 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
Murfin v. United States Department of Energy
See United States v. Exxon Corp., 773 F.2d 1240 (TECA 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 892 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986); Sauder v. Department of Energy, 648 F.2d 1341 (TECA 1981); In re: The Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litigation (Conoco Inc. v. DOE), 874 F.Supp. 1161 (D.Kan.1994); In re: Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litigation (Mobil v. DOE), 739 F.Supp. 1446 (D.Kan.1990); In re: Department of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litigation (Chevron v. DOE), 746 F.Supp. 1452 (D.Kan.1990), rev’d in part on other grounds, 944 F.2d 914 (TECA 1991).
cited
Cited "see"
In Re Dept. of Energy Stripper Well Exempt. Lit.
See United States v. Exxon Corp., 773 F.2d 1240 (TECA 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 892 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986); Sauder v. Department of Energy, 648 F.2d 1341 (TECA 1981).
cited
Cited "see"
Conoco Inc. v. United States Department of Energy
See United States v. Exxon Corp., 773 F.2d 1240 (TECA 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 892 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986); Sauder v. Department of Energy, 648 F.2d 1341 (TECA 1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Don Van Vranken v. Atlantic Richfield Company
See United States v. Exxon Corp., 773 F.2d 1240, 1278 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1985) (awarding prejudgment interest under Sec. 209, and distinguishing actions under Sec. 210), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 892 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Van Vranken v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
See United States v. Exxon Corp., 773 F.2d 1240, 1278 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1985) (awarding prejudgment interest under § 209, and distinguishing actions under § 210), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 892 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
National Labor Relations Board v. Augusta Bakery Corporation
See Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc., 268 N.L.R.B. 1044 , 1045 (1984), enf'd, 765 F.2d 148 (9th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 893 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Dept. of Energy Stripper Well Litigation
See United States v. Exxon Corp., 773 F.2d 1240 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 892 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986); Sauder v. Department of Energy, 648 F.2d 1341 (Temp.Emer.Ct.
discussed
Cited "see"
Stout v. United States Department of Energy
See United States v. Exxon Corp., 773 F.2d 1240 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 892 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986); Sauder v. Department of Energy, 648 F.2d 1341 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Free v. Granger
See Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 763 F.2d 1250, 1256 (11th Cir.1985) (adopting the six year statute of limitations for trespass for all Section 1983 claims in Alabama), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 893 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986); see also Mulligan v. Hazard, 777 F.2d 340 (6th Cir.1985) (favoring the Ohio statutes of limitations for libel, slander, and other intentional torts, while rejecting the statute of limitations for bodily injury), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1174 , 106 S.Ct. 2902 , 90 L.Ed.2d 988 (1986); Gates v. Spinks, 771 F.2d 916 (5th Cir.1985) (selecting the Mississippi statute of…
discussed
Cited "see"
Free v. Granger
See Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 763 F.2d 1250, 1256 (11th Cir.1985) (adopting the six year statute of limitations for trespass for all Section 1983 claims in Alabama), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 893 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986); see also Mulligan v. Hazard, 777 F.2d 340 (6th Cir.1985) (favoring the Ohio statutes of limitations for libel, slander, and other intentional torts, while rejecting the statute of limitations for bodily injury), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1174 , 106 S.Ct. 2902 , 90 L.Ed.2d 988 (1986); Gates v. Spinks, 771 F.2d 916 (5th Cir.1985) (selecting the Mississippi statute of…
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Dept. of Energy Stripper Well Exemption Lit.
(2×)
See United States v. Exxon Corp., 773 F.2d 1240, 1279 (TECA 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 892 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Mobil Oil Corp. v. United States Department of Energy
(2×)
See United States v. Exxon Corp., 773 F.2d 1240, 1279 (TECA 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 892 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Ivey Hugh Rutherford v. Exxon Company, U.S.A.
See United States v. Exxon Corp., 773 F.2d 1240 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.1985), aff’g 561 F.Supp. 816 (D.D.C.1983), cer t. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 892 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986), reh’g denied, 475 U.S. 1112 , 106 S.Ct. 1526 , 89 L.Ed.2d 923 (1986), — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 766 , 98 L.Ed.2d 781 (1988). 2 .
cited
Cited "see"
Jarvis Christian College v. Exxon Corporation, Ivey Hugh Rutherford v. Exxon Corporation, C.M. Beckett, Jr. v. Exxon Corporation
See United States v. Exxon Corp., 561 F.Supp. 816 (D.D.C.1983), aff'd, 773 F.2d 1240 (TECA 1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 892 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986). 10 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Kessel v. Schaff
See Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 763 F.2d 1250 (11th Cir.1985) cert. denied 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 893 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986); Cook v. City of Minneapolis, 617 F.Supp. 461 (D.C.Minn.1985); Chris N. v. Burnsville, Minn., 634 F.Supp. 1402 (D.Minn.1986); Gates v. Spinks, 771 F.2d 916 (5th Cir. 1985) cert. denied 475 U.S. 1065 , 106 S.Ct. 1378 , 89 L.Ed.2d 603 (1986); U.S. v. Fountain, 777 F.2d 345 (7th Cir.1985) cert. denied 475 U.S. 1124 , 106 S.Ct. 1647 , 90 L.Ed. 2d 191 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dianne Mullinax v. E.B. McElhenney Clifford Sticher and Robert E. Keller
See abo Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 763 F.2d 1250 , 1253 n. 2 (11th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, _ U.S. _, 106 S.Ct. 893 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986) (applying Wibon retroactively in Alabama Section 1983 case where parties did not dispute its retroactivity).
discussed
Cited "see"
International Union of Elevator Constructors and Local 34 International Union of Elevator Constructors v. The Home Elevator Company, Inc.
See generally Preuit & Mauldin v. Jones, — U.S.—, 106 S.Ct. 893 , 895 n. 3, 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986) (White, J., dissenting); Smith v. Evening News Assn., 371 U.S. 195, 203 , 83 S.Ct. 267, 271 , 9 L.Ed.2d 246 (1962) (Black, J., dissenting). 4 .
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Daniel Browning, D/B/A Daniel Browning Excavating Co. Linda Browning v. Craig R. Pendleton
(2×)
Compare Jones v. Preuit & Mauldin, 763 F.2d 1250 (11th Cir.1985) (selecting intentional tort limitations period), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 893 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986); and Gates v. Spinks, 771 F.2d 916 (5th Cir.1985) (same), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1065 , 106 S.Ct. 1378 , 89 L.Ed.2d 603 (1986), with Meade v. Grubbs, 841 F.2d 1512 (10th Cir.1988) (selecting general personal injury statute); and Small v. Inhabitants of Belfast, 796 F.2d 544 (1st Cir.1986) (same).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
See, e.g., Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc., 268 N.L.R.B. 1044 , 1044 nn. 2, 4 (1984), enforced, 765 F.2d 148 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 893 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986) (where General Counsel failed to object at the backpay hearing to evidence that introduced a new issue and effectively altered an employer’s answer to the backpay specification, General Counsel estopped from raising procedural objections before the NLRB).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Kawasaki Motors Manufacturing Corporation, U.S.A. v. National Labor Relations Board
See, e.g., Clear Pine Mouldings, Inc., 268 N.L.R.B. 1044 , 1044 nn. 2, 4 (1984), enforced, 765 F.2d 148 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 893 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986) (where General Counsel failed to object at the backpay hearing to evidence that introduced a new issue and effectively altered an employer's answer to the backpay specification, General Counsel estopped from raising procedural objections before the NLRB).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
Kern Oil & Refining Co., Plaintiff/counter-Defendant/appellee v. Tenneco Oil Company, Defendant/counter-Claimant/appellant
See, e.g., United States v. Exxon Corp., 773 F.2d 1240 (T.E.C.A.1985), cer t. denied, 474 U.S. 1105 , 106 S.Ct. 892 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sutton
See also our discussion in United States v. Exxon Corp., 773 F.2d 1240, at p. 1284-1286 (TECA 1985), cert. den., — U.S. — , 106 S.Ct. 892 , 88 L.Ed.2d 926 (1986), rehearing denied, — U.S. — , 106 S.Ct. 1526 , 89 L.Ed.2d 923 (1986). .
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Lepiscopo
v.
York
v.
York
No. 85-6006.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jan 27, 1986.
Published
C. A. 10th Cir. Certio-rari denied.