green
Positive treatment
Quoted verbatim 5×
14.7 score
G Cite
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
"[S]ecurity-related decisions of prison officials are to be reviewed only for reasonableness; if the decisions are rational (an exceedingly undemanding standard), courts are to look no further."
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“[T]he focus of inquiry is on the circumstances and status of those harmed and not merely on whether *405 the acts were committed during the disorder.”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“the policies expressed in the federal antitrust laws will override any agreement in contravention of those policies, regardless of the agreement’s legality under private contract law”
cited 3× by 1 distinct case ·
“trade secret law is intended to maintain and promote standards of commercial ethics and fair dealing”
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 50 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Intergraph Corp. v. Intel Corp.
the policies expressed in the federal antitrust laws will override any agreement in contravention of those policies, regardless of the agreement's legality under private contract law
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Picker International Corp. v. Imaging Equipment Services, Inc.
trade secret law is intended to maintain and promote standards of commercial ethics and fair dealing
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
In Re Asahi/America, Inc.
ome devices are so simple and their purpose and efficacy so obvious that their complete construction is sufficient to demonstrate workability
discussed
Cited as authority (quoted)
Scott v. Mississippi Dept. of Corrections
ecurity-related decisions of prison officials are to be reviewed only for reasonableness; if the decisions are rational (an exceedingly undemanding standard), courts are to look no further.
examined
Cited as authority (quoted)
Ahmad v. Wigen
(8×)
also: Cited "see", Cited "see, e.g."
he focus of inquiry is on the circumstances and status of those harmed and not merely on whether 405 the acts were committed during the disorder.
cited
Cited as authority (rule)
Phillip Oiness and Sun Products Group, Inc., Plaintiffs/cross-Appellants v. Walgreen Company, Atico International Incorporated, F/k/a J & M Enterprises, D/B/A Atico, New Atico International, Ltd, D/B/A New Atico, A/K/A Atico
King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 863 , 226 USPQ 402 56 , 409, (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 57 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Biovail Corp. International v. Hoechst Aktiengesellschaft
See CVD, Inc. v. Raytheon Co., 769 F.2d 842, 851 (1st Cir.1985) (holding that “the threat of unfounded trade secrets litigation in bad faith is sufficient to constitute a cause of action under the antitrust laws, provided that the other essential elements of a violation are proven”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1198 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Vucurevich v. Stragalas (In Re Stragalas)
See Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank (In re Daniel), 771 F.2d 1352, 1360 (9th Cir.1985) (cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1199 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986)) (abrogated by Patterson v. Shumate, 504 U.S. 753 , 112 S.Ct. 2242 , 119 L.Ed.2d 519 *695 (1992) (Patterson holds that the term “nonbankruptcy law” contained in 11 U.S.C. § 541 (c)(2) was more expansive than the holdings in cases such as Daniel, which limited § 541(c)(2) to state law; Patterson holds that § 541(c)(2) includes federal non-bankruptcy law, in addition to state law)).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Extradition of Lui Kin-Hong
See Demjanjuk v. Petrovsky, 776 F.2d 571, 584 (6th Cir.1985) (“A decision to attach conditions to an order of extradition is within the discretion of the Secretary of State, not the courts.”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1198 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); Emami v. United States Dist.
examined
Cited "see"
King Instruments Corporation v. Luciano Perego and Tapematic, Defendant/cross-Appellants
(4×)
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853 , 226 USPQ 402 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986) ("Otari") ( U.S. Patent No. 3,737,358 on a "shift block" splicer held invalid.). 70 The Rite-Hite court ruled that patent infringement damages under 35 U.S.C.
cited
Cited "see"
Bristol Steel & Iron Works, Incorporated v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation
See Wilhelm v. Blue Bell, Inc., 773 F.2d 1429, 1433 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1199 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Phillip P. Rogers and Faye Rogers Living Trust and Faye Rogers, Trustee v. Baxter International Inc.
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 861 , 226 USPQ 402, 407 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Pioneer Hi-Bred International v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc.
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 863 (Fed.Cir.1985) (lost profits award “requires (1) a showing that the patent owner would have made the sale but for the infringement, i.e., causation existed, and (2) proper evidence of the computation on the loss of profits”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); but see Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros.
discussed
Cited "see"
Pioneer Hi-Bred International, an Iowa Corporation v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Hawaiian Research, Ltd., an Iowa Corporation Corn States Hybrid Service, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Pioneer Hi-Bred International, an Iowa Corporation v. Holden Foundation Seeds, Inc., an Iowa Corporation, Hawaiian Research, Ltd., an Iowa Corporation Corn States Hybrid Service, Inc., an Iowa Corporation
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 863 (Fed.Cir.1985) (lost profits award "requires (1) a showing that the patent owner would have made the sale but for the infringement, i.e., causation existed, and (2) proper evidence of the computation on the loss of profits"), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); but see Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros.
discussed
Cited "see"
Bass v. City of Wilson
See Wilhelm v. Blue Bell, Inc., 773 F.2d 1429, 1434 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1199 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986) (statement by manager that “Blue Bell doesn’t want salesmen with good records anymore ...
discussed
Cited "see"
HBE Leasing Corp. v. Frank
See CVD, Inc. v. Raytheon Co., 769 F.2d 842, 860 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1198 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); Arnott v. American Oil Co., 609 F.2d 873 , 889 n. 15 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 918 , 100 S.Ct. 1852 , 64 L.Ed.2d 272 (1980); Noble v. McClatchy Newspapers, 533 F.2d 1081, 1090-91 (9th Cir.1975), vacated on other grounds, 433 U.S. 904 , 97 S.Ct. 2966 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1088 (1977); Pollock & Riley, Inc. v. Pearl Brewing Co., 498 F.2d 1240, 1242-43 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 992 , 95 S.Ct. 1427 , 43 L.Ed.2d 673 (1975); Semke v. Enid Auto.
discussed
Cited "see"
Hbe Leasing Corporation v. Frank
See CVD, Inc. v. Raytheon Co., 769 F.2d 842, 860 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1198 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); Arnott v. American Oil Co., 609 F.2d 873 , 889 n. 15 (8th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 918 , 100 S.Ct. 1852 , 64 L.Ed.2d 272 (1980); Noble v. McClatchy Newspapers, 533 F.2d 1081, 1090-91 (9th Cir.1975), vacated on other grounds, 433 U.S. 904 , 97 S.Ct. 2966 , 53 L.Ed.2d 1088 (1977); Pollock & Riley, Inc. v. Pearl Brewing Co., 498 F.2d 1240, 1242-43 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied, 420 U.S. 992 , 95 S.Ct. 1427 , 43 L.Ed.2d 673 (1975); Semke v. Enid Auto.
discussed
Cited "see"
John Demjanjuk v. Joseph Petrovsky
(2×)
See Demjanjuk v. Petrovsky, 776 F.2d 571 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016, 106 S.Ct. 1198 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Colbert v. United States
See Hornbuckle v. Arco Oil & Gas Co., 732 F.2d 1233, 1237 (5th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1198 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); cf. Jaffe v. Grant, 793 F.2d 1182, 1189-90 (11th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 480 U.S. 931 , 107 S.Ct. 1566 , 94 L.Ed.2d 759 (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
Atlantic Thermoplastics Co., Inc., James B. Sullivan and Richard B. Fox v. Faytex Corporation
(2×)
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 859-60 , 226 USPQ 402, 406 (Fed.Cir.1985), cer t. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 [ 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 ] (1986); Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik AG v. Murata Mach., Ltd., 731 F.2d 831, 835-37 , 221 USPQ 561, 564-65 (Fed.Cir.1984); see also In re Corcoran, 640 F.2d 1331, 1333-34 , 208 USPQ 867, 870 (CCPA 1981).
discussed
Cited "see"
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. General Dynamics Corp., Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. General Dynamics Corporation
See Hornbuckle v. Arco Oil & Gas Co., 732 F.2d 1233, 1237 (5th Cir.) (a court may dismiss a claim only when lesser sanctions have proved futile), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1198 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1985); Callip v. Harris County Child Welfare Dept., 757 F.2d 1513, 1521 (5th Cir.1985) (“we cannot affirm a dismissal unless the district court expressly considered alternative sanctions and determined that they would not be sufficient ... ”).
discussed
Cited "see"
E.E.O.C. v. General Dynamics Corp.
See Hornbuckle v. Arco Oil & Gas Co., 732 F.2d 1233, 1237 (5th Cir.) (a court may dismiss a claim only when lesser sanctions have proved futile), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1198 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1985); Callip v. Harris County Child Welfare Dept., 757 F.2d 1513, 1521 (5th Cir.1985) ("we cannot affirm a dismissal unless the district court expressly considered alternative sanctions and determined that they would not be sufficient ...").
cited
Cited "see"
Earl Lee and David Abramson v. Richard Burkhart and Patrick Sullivan, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
See Chambless v. Masters, Mates & Pilots Pension Plan, 772 F.2d 1032, 1039 (2d Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1189 , 89 L.Ed.2d 304 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Filmtec Corporation v. Hydranautics
See DSL Dynamic Sciences, Ltd. v. Union Switch & Signal, Inc., 928 F.2d 1122, 1126 , 18 USPQ2d 1152, 1155 (Fed.Cir.1991) (citing King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 861 , 226 USPQ 402, 407 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986)).
cited
Cited "see"
Delta-X Corporation v. Baker Hughes Production Tools, Inc., and Baker Cac, Defendants/cross-Appellants
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 866-67 , 226 USPQ 402, 411-12 , (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Derrick Leon Hills, Also Known as Stacy Shelby v. United States
See Demjanjuk v. Petrovsky, 776 F.2d 571, 576 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Ristvedt-Johnson, Inc. v. Brandt, Inc.
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 866-67 , 226 USPQ 402, 411-12 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); State Indus. v. A.O.
discussed
Cited "see"
Memorial Hospital System v. Fisher Insurance Agency, Inc.
See Portland Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Bernstein, 716 S.W.2d 532 (Tex.App. — Corpus Christi 1985, writ ref’d n.r.e.), cert, denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1200 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986); Hoppen-feld v. Crook, 498 S.W.2d 52 (Tex.Civ.
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Donald Dean Walker, Debtor. Donald Dean Walker v. Kenneth G.M. Mather, Trustee
See Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank (In re Daniel), 771 F.2d 1352, 1360 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1199 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986); Lichstrahl v. Bankers Trust (In re Lichstrahl), 750 F.2d 1488, 1490 (11th Cir.1985); Samore v. Graham (In re Graham), 726 F.2d 1268, 1273-74 (8th Cir.1984); Goff v. Taylor (In re Goff), 706 F.2d 574 (5th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Jose Rafael Abello-Silva
See generally Restatement (Third of Foreign Relations Law of the United States § 477, comment b, (1987)); accord Demjanjuk v. Petrovsky, 776 F.2d 571, 583-84 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1198 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Wimmer
See, In re Daniel, 771 F.2d 1352 , 1360 (9th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1199 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986); In re Lichstrahl, 750 F.2d 1488, 1490 (11th Cir. 1985); In re Graham, 726 F.2d 1268 (8th Cir.1984); Matter of Goff, 706 F.2d 574 (5th Cir.1983); Regan v. Ross, 691 F.2d 81 (2nd Cir.1982); In re Brooks, 844 F.2d 258 (5th Cir.1988); In re Swanson, 873 F.2d 1121 (8th Cir.1989).
discussed
Cited "see"
Fryman v. Federal Crop Insurance
(2×)
See Wilhelm v. Blue Bell, Inc., 773 F.2d 1429, 1433-35 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1199 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
Clay Fryman v. Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
(2×)
See Wilhelm v. Blue Bell, Inc., 773 F.2d 1429, 1433-35 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1199 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Kelsey-Hayes Co. v. Motor Wheel Corp.
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853, 866 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Elizabeth Hayes Lucas, Debtor. Jane B. Forbes, Trustee v. Elizabeth Hayes Lucas, Holiday Corporation Savings and Retirement Plan
See In re Daniel, 771 F.2d 1352 , 1360 (9th Cir.1985) cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1199 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986); In re Lichstrahl, 750 F.2d 1488, 1490 (11th Cir.1985); In re Graham, 726 F.2d 1268 (8th Cir.1984); Matter of Goff, 706 F.2d 574 (5th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Velis
See Daniel v. Security Pacific Nat’l Bank (In re Daniel), 771 F.2d 1352, 1360 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1199 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986); Lichstrahl v. Bankers Trust (In re Lichstrahl), 750 F.2d 1488, 1490 (11th Cir.1985); Samore v. Graham (In re Graham), 726 F.2d 1268, 1273 (8th Cir.1984); Goff v. Taylor (In re Goff), 706 F.2d 574, 580 (5th Cir.1983); but see Anderson v. Raine (In re Moore), 907 F.2d 1476, 1477 (4th Cir.1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Idalski
See In re Daniel, 771 F.2d 1352 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1199 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986); In re Lichstrahl, 750 F.2d 1488 (11th Cir.1985); In re Graham, 726 F.2d 1268 (8th Cir.1984); Regan v. Ross, 691 F.2d 81 (2d Cir.1982); see also McLean v. Central States, S. & S. Areas Pen.
discussed
Cited "see"
Richardson v. TIAA/CREF
Id. at 1478; see In re Daniel, 771 F.2d 1352 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1199 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986); In re Lichstrahl, 750 F.2d 1488 (11th Cir.1985); In re Graham, 726 F.2d 1268 (8th Cir.1984); In re Goff, 706 F.2d 574 (5th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Terrell State Hospital of the Texas Department of Mental Health & Mental Retardation v. Ashworth
(2×)
See Portland Sav. & Loan Ass’n v. Bernstein, 716 S.W.2d 532, 541 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1985, writ ref'd n.r.e.) (rejecting argument that trial court was required to order disclosure of material reviewed by witness prior to testifying), cert denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1200 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Hartman
Accord, Daniel v. Security Pacific Nat’l Bank (In re Daniel), 771 F.2d 1352, 1360 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1199 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986); Lichstrahl v. Bankers Trust (In re Lichstrahl), 750 F.2d 1488, 1490 (11th Cir.1985); Goff v. Taylor (In re Goff), 706 F.2d 574, 580-82 (5th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Tyler v. Putman (In Re Putman)
See In re Daniel, 771 F.2d 1352 , 1360 (9th Cir.1985) (following In re Goff, 706 F.2d 574 (5th Cir.1983) and holding that “applicable nonbankruptcy law” in § 541(c)(2) was intended to be a narrow reference to state “spendthrift trust” law and not a broad reference to all other laws, including ERISA and IRC, which prohibit alienation), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1199 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986); In re Lichstrakl, 750 F.2d 1488, 1490 (11th Cir. 1985) (holding that “applicable nonbank-ruptcy law” in § 541(c)(2) refers only to state spendthrift trust law); In re Graham, 726 …
discussed
Cited "see"
Frank Edward Peters v. Jack Egnor, United States Marshal for the District of Colorado
The role of the committing magistrate in reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence is “to determine whether there is competent evidence to justify holding the accused to await trial, and not to determine whether the evidence is sufficient to justify a conviction.” Collins v. Loisel, 259 U.S. 309, 316 , 42 S.Ct. 469, 472 , 66 L.Ed. 956 (1922); accord, e.g., Demjanjuk v. Petrovsky, 776 F.2d 571, 576 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1198 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); see also Restatement (Third) of the Foreign Relations Law of the United States § 476 comment b (1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re \Apollo\" Air Passenger Computer Reservation System"
See, Barry Wright Corp. v. ITT Grinnell Corp., 724 F.2d 227, 238 (1st Cir.1983), and CVD, Inc. v. Raytheon Company, 769 F.2d 842 (1st Cir.1985) cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1198 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Carlos J. Acosta, Jr.
See United States v. Navarro-Ordas, 770 F.2d 959, 970 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1200 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986). 4 AFFIRMED in part, and REMANDED in part with instructions. 1 .
cited
Cited "see"
Spalding & Evenflo Companies, Inc. v. Acushnet Co.
See King Instrument Corp. v. Otari Corp., 767 F.2d 853 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1197 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
In Re Leimbach
See Daniel v. Security Pacific National Bank (In re Daniel), 771 F.2d 1352 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1199 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 ; Lichstrahl v. Bankers Trust (In re Lichstrahl), 750 F.2d 1488 (11th Cir.1985); Samore v. Graham (In re Graham), 726 F.2d 1268 (8th Cir.1984); Goff v. Taylor (In re Goff), 706 F.2d 574 (5th Cir.1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
Matter of Extradition of Atta
See Magistrate’s Opinion at 14 (citing Demjanjuk v. Petrovsky, 776 F.2d 571, 581 (6th Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1198 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986), for the proposition that the the phrase "extradition need not be granted” has a discretionary rather than a prohibitory meaning).
discussed
Cited "see"
Sam T. COSTON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. PLITT THEATRES, INC., Defendant-Appellant
See Wilhelm v. Blue Bell, Inc., 773 F.2d 1429, 1435 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1199 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986); Powell v. Rockwell Int’l Corp., 788 F.2d 279, 285-86 (5th Cir.1986); Williams v. Caterpillar Tractor Co., 770 F.2d 47, 50-51 (6th Cir.1985); Nolting v. Yellow Freight Sys., 799 F.2d 1192, 1197-98 (8th Cir.1986); Gilchrist v. Jim Slemons Imports, Inc., 803 F.2d 1488, 1495-96 (9th Cir.1986); Smith v. Consol.
discussed
Cited "see"
Oen Yin-Choy v. Glen S. Robinson, U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of California
See Demjanjuk v. Petrovsky, 776 F.2d 571, 577 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1198 , 89 L.Ed.2d 312 (1986); David v. Attorney General, 699 F.2d 411, 416-17 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 832 , 104 S.Ct. 113 , 78 L.Ed.2d 114 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see"
C.W. Blalock, Jr. v. United States
(2×)
See United States v. Navarro-Ordas, 770 F.2d 959, 968 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1016 , 106 S.Ct. 1200 , 89 L.Ed.2d 313 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Otari Corp.
v.
King Instrument Corp.
v.
King Instrument Corp.
No. 85-1057.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1986.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
Citer courts: N.D. Alabama (1) · Fifth Circuit (1) · Federal Circuit (1) · D. Massachusetts (1) · E.D. New York (1)
C. A. Fed. Cir. Certiorari denied.