green
Positive treatment
8.1 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 20 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Behmanshah
(2×)
See United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1129 (3rd Cir.1985) (“To find plain error [under Rule] 52(b), the mistake need be so clear that ‘the trial judge and prosecutor were derelict in countenancing it, even absent the defendant’s timely assistance in detecting it.’ ”), (quoting United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152, 163 , 102 S.Ct. 1584 , 71 L.Ed.2d 816 (1982)), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. George Wayneti Reeder, A/K/A Wayne Reeder
(2×)
See United States v. Guerrero-Guerrero, 776 F.2d 1071, 1075 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Bissell
(2×)
Counsel for Barbara BisseU’s passing comment regarding her belief Proposed Jury Instruction No. 100 should not be given does not meet her requirement to state “distinctly the matter objected to and the grounds of the objection.” Fed.R.Crim.P. 30 11 ; see United States v. Rosero, 42 F.3d 166, 173 (3d Cir.1994) (“Without a clearly articulated objection, a trial judge is not appraised sufficiently of the contested issue and the need to cure a potential issue____”) (citing United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1128-29 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.E…
discussed
Cited "see"
Big Apple Bmw, Inc. Potamkin Bmw and Vw, Inc. Robert Potamkin Alan Potamkin, in No. 91-1339 v. Bmw of North America, Inc. And Bayerische Motoren Werks, A.G. Big Apple Bmw, Inc. Potamkin Bmw & Vw, Inc. Robert Potamkin Alan Potamkin v. Bmw of North America, Inc. And Bayerische Motoren Werks, A.G. Bmw of North America, Inc., in No. 91-1458
(2×)
Id. at 254 ; see United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986). 87 Because the Potamkins have proffered evidence to show concerted action in violation of the Sherman Act, they have demonstrated the requisite conspiracy for admissibility under Rule 801(d)(2)(E).
discussed
Cited "see"
Big Apple BMW, Inc. v. BMW of North America, Inc.
(2×)
Id. at 254 ; see United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Grand Jury Investigation (Detroit Police Department Special Cash Fund)
See United States v. Sharp, 778 F.2d 1182 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1030 , 106 S.Ct. 1234 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986) (discussing application of informer’s privilege in the Sixth Circuit).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Robert J. Wilkinson
(2×)
See United States v. Guerrero-Guerrero, 776 F.2d 1071, 1075 (1st Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986); see also Young-Bey, 893 F.2d at 181 ; Lyman, 892 F.2d at 752-54 ; Boyd, 885 F.2d at 250 ; LaGuardia, 774 F.2d at 321 .
examined
Cited "see"
United States v. Daniel Joseph Maravilla, United States v. Rafael Jesus Dominguez
(4×)
See Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80 , 62 S.Ct. 457, 469 , 86 L.Ed. 680 (1942); accord United States v. Guerrero-Guerrero, 776 F.2d 1071, 1073 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Scarfo
(2×)
See United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1128 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986); United States v. Agnes, 753 F.2d 293, 301 (3d Cir.1985).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Joseph Zingaro
(2×)
See United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1123 (3d Cir.1985) (no constructive amendment where “variation did not broaden the bases for conviction, but instead narrowed the scope of the evidence to prove an offense included in the indictment”), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986); United States v. Kuna, 760 F.2d 813, 817-18 (7th Cir.1985) (describing Miller as distinguishing constructive amendments that broaden possible bases for conviction from variations that narrow indictment’s charges without adding any new offenses).
cited
Cited "see"
The United States v. Emmett Earl Fulford, Anthony J. Sanner. Appeal of Emmett Earl Fulford
See Shack v. Attorney General of Pennsylvania, 776 F.2d 1170 (3d Cir.1985), ce rt. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1234 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Remeta v. Singletary
Frisbie v. Collins, 342 U.S. 519, 522 , 72 S.Ct. 509, 511 , 96 L.Ed. 541 (1952); see also Shack v. Attorney General of State of Pa., 776 F.2d 1170, 1172 (3rd Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1030 , 106 S.Ct. 1234 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986) (where petitioner was not given pretransfer hearing, court held that “the existence of a procedural defect in [petitioner’s] extradition proceedings did not impair [the state’s] power to try him and ... his confinement does not violate due process.”) 5 We conclude that Kansas’s alleged failure to obtain from Remeta a knowing and voluntary waiver of e…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Spinney
(2×)
See, e.g., United States v. Guerrero-Guerre ro, 776 F.2d 1071 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986); United States v. Quejada-Zurique, 708 F.2d 857 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 855 , 104 S.Ct. 173 , 78 L.Ed.2d 156 (1983).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Robles
United States v. Kerris, 748 F.2d 610, 614 (11th Cir.1984); see also United States v. Sharp, 778 F.2d 1182, 1187 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1030, 106 S.Ct. 1234 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986) (District court should not compel in camera interview of confidential informant unless the defendant first produces some evidence supporting his entrapment defense.). 9 Accordingly, disclosure of the confidential informant is not warranted in this case.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Louis Smith
(2×)
See also United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1129 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986). 42 Under these well-established principles, there was no plain error here.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald Johnstone
(2×)
“Convictions generally have been sustained as long as the proof upon which they are based corresponds to an offense that was clearly set out in the indictment.” Miller, 471 U.S. at 136 , 105 S.Ct. at 1815 (deciding whether Fifth Amendment prohibits conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 1341 when proof at trial corresponded to fraudulent scheme narrower than that alleged in indictment); see also United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1121-23 (3d Cir.1985) (upholding conviction where evidence at trial established conspiracy narrower than that alleged in indictment), ce rt. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 1…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Albert John Thame, Jr.
(2×)
For example, the Supreme Court has suggested that “[bjy its terms, recourse may be had to [Rule 52(b) ] only on appeal from a trial infected with error so ‘plain’ that the trial judge and prosecutor were derelict in countenancing it, even absent the defendant’s timely assistance in detecting it.” United States v. Frady, 456 U.S. 152, 163 , 102 S.Ct. 1584, 1592 , 71 L.Ed.2d 816 (1982); see also United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1129 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Sultan El-Gawli
(2×)
See also United States v. Rangel, 534 F.2d 147, 149 (9th Cir.) (ruling that even if evidence as to predisposition was inadmissible, overwhelming evidence that government had not induced defendant to commit the crime sufficed to disprove entrapment defense), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 854 , 97 S.Ct. 147 , 50 L.Ed.2d 129 (1976). *148 El-Gawli’s argument for an “and” charge derives from our decision in United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1029 , 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986).
examined
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gibbs, Stephen A/K/A \Jake\". Appeal of Stephen Gibbs"
(4×)
See, e.g., United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118 , 1123 n. 3 (3d Cir.1985) (U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania — the same office as is involved in this case — drafted an indictment charging agreement “to possess with intent to distribute a quantity of marihuana exceeding 1,000 pounds ... in violation of Title 21, United States Code, Section 841 (a) and Section 841(b)(6)”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986); United States v. Zarintash, 736 F.2d 66, 67 (3d Cir.1984) (indictment originating in District of New Jersey charged co…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Nathaniel Coleman, A/K/A \Boo Tee Coleman\"
(2×)
United States v. Campbell, 702 F.2d 262, 264 (D.C.Cir.1983) (citations omitted); see also United States v. Castro, 776 F.2d 1118, 1125 (3d Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 1233 , 89 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986); United States v. Dixon, 658 F.2d 181, 188 (3d Cir.1981).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Randazzo
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-6178.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Feb 24, 1986.
Published
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.