green
Positive treatment
4.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1986 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1986
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 12 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Williams
See State v. Via, 146 Ariz. 108, 122 , 704 P.2d 238, 252 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1268 , 89 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986) (noting trial court’s considerable discretion in deciding whether to admit evidence under Ariz. R.Evid. 403).
discussed
Cited "see"
U.S. v. Deshaw
Accord, United States v. Boldin, 772 F.2d 719 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1269 , 89 L.Ed.2d 577 , 475 U.S. 1098 , 106 S.Ct. 1498 , 89 L.Ed.2d 899 , 475 U.S. 1110 , 106 S.Ct. 1520 , 89 L.Ed.2d 917 (1986); United States v. Thomas, 757 F.2d 1359 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 819 , 479 U.S. 818 , 106 S.Ct. 66 , 67, 107 S.Ct. 78 , 88 L.Ed.2d 54 , 93 L.Ed.2d 34 (1985). 26 .
cited
Cited "see"
Carriger v. Lewis
See Miller v. Stagner, 757 F.2d 988, 993 (9th Cir.), as amended, 768 F.2d 1090 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 1049, 106 S.Ct. 1269 , 1271, 89 L.Ed.2d 577 , 579 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
Paris Hoyt Carriger v. Samuel A. Lewis, Director of Doc Attorney General, State of Arizona, Paris Hoyt Carriger v. Samuel A. Lewis, Paris Hoyt Carriger v. Samuel A. Lewis, Paris Hoyt Carriger v. Samuel A. Lewis, Paris Hoyt Carriger v. Samuel A. Lewis
See Miller v. Stagner, 757 F.2d 988, 993 (9th Cir.), as amended, 768 F.2d 1090 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 1049, 106 S.Ct. 1269 , 1271, 89 L.Ed.2d 577 , 579 (1986).
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Mauro
See State v. Via, 146 Ariz. 108, 117 , 704 P.2d 238, 247 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1268 , 89 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
William Lyle Woratzeck v. James R. Ricketts, and Donald Wawrzaszek
(2×)
To obtain relief for a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on a habeas corpus review, the petitioner must demonstrate that his attorney "made errors that a reasonably competent attorney acting as a diligent and conscientious advocate would not have made, and petitioner must also demonstrate prejudice." Butcher v. Marquez, 758 F.2d 373, 375-76 (9th Cir.1985) (Butcher ) (citing Strickland ); see Miller v. Stagner, 757 F.2d 988, 996 (9th Cir.), amended in other respects, 768 F.2d 1090 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1269 , 89 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see"
William Lyle Woratzeck v. James R. Ricketts, and Donald Wawrzaszek
To obtain relief for a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel on a habeas corpus review, the petitioner must demonstrate that his attorney "made errors that a reasonably competent attorney acting as a diligent and conscientious advocate would not have made, and petitioner must also demonstrate prejudice." Butcher v. Marquez, 758 F.2d 373, 375-76 (9th Cir.1985) (Butcher ) (citing Strickland ); see Miller v. Stagner, 757 F.2d 988, 996 (9th Cir.), amended in other respects, 768 F.2d 1090 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1269 , 89 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Strong
See, e.g., State v. Via, 146 Ariz. 108, 119 , 704 P.2d 238, 249 (1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1268 , 89 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986) (defendant was only subject with “the beginnings of a full beard”); State v. Money, 110 Ariz. 18, 21-23 , 514 P.2d 1014, 1017-19 (1973) (in-person lineup not unduly suggestive despite minor differences in height, weight and hair length, and where only defendant had a mustache); State v. Bailes, 118 Ariz. 582, 587 , 578 P.2d 1011, 1016 (App.1978) (photographic lineup not unduly suggestive despite fact that only defendant was disfigured with two blacken…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Krone
(2×)
Compare State v. Adamson, 136 Ariz. 250, 257 , 665 P.2d 972, 979 (summarily approving admission of similar statements), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 865 , 104 S.Ct. 204 , 78 L.Ed.2d 178 (1983) with State v. Via, 146 Ariz. 108, 121 , 704 P.2d 238, 251 (1985) (approving admission of hearsay when "primary purpose" was "to show that [the] declarant acted in accordance with his stated intention to be at a certain place at a certain time"), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1268 , 89 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Garland Claude Cochran
To establish a conspiracy, “[a]n overt act is not required, only proof that the defendant conspired to commit the prohibited offense.” United States v. Sanchez, 722 F.2d 1501, 1505 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, *1018 467 U.S. 1208 , 104 S.Ct. 2396 , 81 L.Ed.2d 353 (1984); see also United States v. Boldin, 779 F.2d 618, 619 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048 , 106 S.Ct. 1269 , 89 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986) (amending prior opinion to omit an overt act requirement from the elements of proof necessary for a conspiracy in violation of section 846).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
In Re George I. Benny and Alexandra Benny, Debtors. Alexandra Benny v. John M. England, Trustee, Chicago Title Insurance Company, Creditor, Etc., United States of America, Intervenor-Appellant v. John M. England, Trustee, Chicago Title Insurance Company, Creditor, Etc.
See Stuart v. Laird, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 299, 308 , 2 L.Ed. 115 (1803) (long practice of Supreme Court Justices sitting as Circuit Justices is a "contemporary interpretation [of the Constitution] of the most forcible nature"); see also United States v. Woodley, 751 F.2d 1008, 1010-11 (9th Cir.1985) (en banc) (relying on historical practice to uphold recess appointments against Article III concerns), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1269 , 89 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Benny v. England
See Stuart v. Laird, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 299, 308 , 2 L.Ed. 115 (1803) (long practice of Supreme Court Justices sitting as Circuit Justices is a “contemporary interpretation [of the Constitution] of the most forcible nature”); see also United States v. Woodley, 751 F.2d 1008, 1010-11 (9th Cir.1985) (en banc) (relying on historical practice to uphold recess appointments against Article III concerns), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 106 S.Ct. 1269 , 89 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Crump
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-5908.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 3, 1986.
Cited by 1 opinion | Published
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.