green
Positive treatment
3.6 score
Treatment trajectory · 1987 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1987
2006
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 8 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
Feldon Jackson, Jr. v. John Shanks
See United States v. Rivera, 778 F.2d 591, 600 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1068 , 106 S.Ct. 1384 , 89 L.Ed.2d 609 (1986); Trial Tapes 1, 3, 7 and 9.
cited
Cited "see"
State v. Hatton
See United States v. Agilar, 779 F.2d 123, 126 (2nd Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1068 , 106 S.Ct. 1385 , 89 L.Ed.2d 609 (1986); United States v. Holland, 810 F.2d at 1219-20 .
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Ward
See United States v. Agilar (C.A.2, 1985), 779 F.2d 123 , certiorari denied (1986), 475 U.S. 1068 , 106 S.Ct. 1385 , 89 L.Ed.2d 609 ; United States v. Nieves (S.D.N.Y. 1985), 608 F.Supp. 1147 ; United States v. Dixon (S.D.N.Y.1985), 619 F.Supp. *635 1399.
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Donald Whoie
See, e.g., United States v. Rivera, 778 F.2d 591, 600-01 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 *1484 U.S. 1068, 106 S.Ct. 1384 , 89 L.Ed.2d 609 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Melvin C. Cross
(2×)
See also United States v. Agilar, 779 F.2d 123, 125-26 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1068 , 106 S.Ct. 1385 , 89 L.Ed.2d 609 (1986) (section 845a does not violate due process because it is rationally related to goal of reducing availability of drugs near a school).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
State v. Moore
(2×)
See also United States v. Agilar, 779 F.2d 123, 125 (2d Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1068 , 106 S.Ct. 1385 , 89 L.Ed.2d 609 (1986) (the proscription of sales within the environs of schools is a rational means of reducing the risk of easy availability that can lead to acquisition by children); United States v. Cunningham, 615 F. Supp. 519, 520-21 (S.D.N.Y. 1985) (statute does not require direct endangerment of children); United States v. Nieves, 608 F. Supp. 1147, 1149 (S.D.N.Y. 1985) (statute creates a valid irrebuttable presumption that drug offenses within 1,000 feet of a school endange…
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gomez
As we said in Petersen , however, such a procedure is necessary only if the defendant makes an “appropriate motion.” 611 F.2d at 1330-31 ; see also United States v. Rivera, 778 F.2d 591, 596 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 1384 , 89 L.Ed.2d 609 (1986).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. Gerardo Antonio Gomez, A/K/A Jerry Gomez, United States of America v. Mickey Crocker, United States of America v. Kelly Lynn Hanlon, A/K/A Leslie Ann Warren
As we said in Petersen, however, such a procedure is necessary only if the defendant makes an "appropriate motion." 611 F.2d at 1330-31 ; see also United States v. Rivera, 778 F.2d 591, 596 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1384 , 89 L.Ed.2d 609 (1986).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Huggard
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 85-6298.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Mar 10, 1986.
Published
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.